This commit has caused failures in some internal benchmarks. Temporarily
reverting this patch until the issue can be diagnosed and fixed.
llvm-svn: 340740
To make ISD::VSELECT available(legal) so long as there are altivec instruction,
otherwise it's default behavior is expanding.
Use xxsel to match vselect if vsx is open, or use vsel.
In order to do not write many patterns in td file, promote (for vector it's
bitcast) all other type into v4i32 and only pattern match vselect of v4i32 into
vsel or xxsel.
Patch by wuzish
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49531
llvm-svn: 339779
`MachineMemOperand` pointers attached to `MachineSDNodes` and instead
have the `SelectionDAG` fully manage the memory for this array.
Prior to this change, the memory management was deeply confusing here --
The way the MI was built relied on the `SelectionDAG` allocating memory
for these arrays of pointers using the `MachineFunction`'s allocator so
that the raw pointer to the array could be blindly copied into an
eventual `MachineInstr`. This creates a hard coupling between how
`MachineInstr`s allocate their array of `MachineMemOperand` pointers and
how the `MachineSDNode` does.
This change is motivated in large part by a change I am making to how
`MachineFunction` allocates these pointers, but it seems like a layering
improvement as well.
This would run the risk of increasing allocations overall, but I've
implemented an optimization that should avoid that by storing a single
`MachineMemOperand` pointer directly instead of allocating anything.
This is expected to be a net win because the vast majority of uses of
these only need a single pointer.
As a side-effect, this makes the API for updating a `MachineSDNode` and
a `MachineInstr` reasonably different which seems nice to avoid
unexpected coupling of these two layers. We can map between them, but we
shouldn't be *surprised* at where that occurs. =]
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50680
llvm-svn: 339740
Summary:
The Signal Processing Engine (SPE) is found on NXP/Freescale e500v1,
e500v2, and several e200 cores. This adds support targeting the e500v2,
as this is more common than the e500v1, and is in SoCs still on the
market.
This patch is very intrusive because the SPE is binary incompatible with
the traditional FPU. After discussing with others, the cleanest
solution was to make both SPE and FPU features on top of a base PowerPC
subset, so all FPU instructions are now wrapped with HasFPU predicates.
Supported by this are:
* Code generation following the SPE ABI at the LLVM IR level (calling
conventions)
* Single- and Double-precision math at the level supported by the APU.
Still to do:
* Vector operations
* SPE intrinsics
As this changes the Callee-saved register list order, one test, which
tests the precise generated code, was updated to account for the new
register order.
Reviewed by: nemanjai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44830
llvm-svn: 337347
and expand it post RA basing on the register pressure. However, we miss to do the add-imm peephole for these pseudo instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47568
Reviewed By: Nemanjai
llvm-svn: 335024
BitPermutationSelector sets Repl32 flag for bit groups which can be (potentially) benefit from 32-bit rotate-and-mask instructions with bit replication, i.e. rlwinm/rlwimi copies lower 32 bits into upper 32 bits on 64-bit PowerPC before rotation.
However, enforcing 32-bit instruction sometimes results in redundant generated code.
For example, the following simple code is compiled into rotldi + rlwimi while it can be compiled into only rldimi instruction if Repl32 flag is not set on the bit group for (a & 0xFFFFFFFF).
uint64_t func(uint64_t a, uint64_t b) {
return (a & 0xFFFFFFFF) | (b << 32) ;
}
To avoid such problem, this patch checks the potential benefit of Repl32 flag before setting it. If a bit group does not require rotation (i.e. RLAmt == 0) and won't be merged into another group, we do not benefit from Repl32 flag on this group.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47867
llvm-svn: 334195
BitPermutationSelector builds the output value by repeating rotate-and-mask instructions with input registers.
Here, we may avoid one rotate instruction if we start building from an input register that does not require rotation.
For example of the test case bitfieldinsert.ll, it first rotates left r4 by 8 bits and then inserts some bits from r5 without rotation.
This can be executed by one rlwimi instruction, which rotates r4 by 8 bits and inserts its bits into r5.
This patch adds a check for rotation amounts in the comparator used in sorting to process the input without rotation first.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47765
llvm-svn: 334011
Instruction selection can insert nodes into the underlying list after the root
node so iterating will thereby miss it. We should NOT assume that, the root node
is the last element in the DAG nodelist.
Patch by: steven.zhang (Qing Shan Zhang)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47437
llvm-svn: 333415
The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects.
The renaming was done as follows:
- git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/LLVM_DEBUG(/g'
- git diff -U0 master | ../clang/tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py -i -p1 -style LLVM
- Manual change to APInt
- Manually chage DOCS as regex doesn't match it.
In the transition period the DEBUG() macro is still present and aliased
to the LLVM_DEBUG() one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43624
llvm-svn: 332240
Vectorized loops with abs() returns incorrect results on POWER9. This patch fixes it.
For example the following code returns negative result if input values are negative though it sums up the absolute value of the inputs.
int vpx_satd_c(const int16_t *coeff, int length) {
int satd = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < length; ++i) satd += abs(coeff[i]);
return satd;
}
This problem causes test failures for libvpx.
For vector absolute and vector absolute difference on POWER9, LLVM generates VABSDUW (Vector Absolute Difference Unsigned Word) instruction or variants.
Since these instructions are for unsigned integers, we need adjustment for signed integers.
For abs(sub(a, b)), we generate VABSDUW(a+0x80000000, b+0x80000000). Otherwise, abs(sub(-1, 0)) returns 0xFFFFFFFF(=-1) instead of 1. For abs(a), we generate VABSDUW(a+0x80000000, 0x80000000).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45522
llvm-svn: 330497
Summary:
r327219 added wrappers to std::sort which randomly shuffle the container before sorting.
This will help in uncovering non-determinism caused due to undefined sorting
order of objects having the same key.
To make use of that infrastructure we need to invoke llvm::sort instead of std::sort.
Note: This patch is one of a series of patches to replace *all* std::sort to llvm::sort.
Refer the comments section in D44363 for a list of all the required patches.
Reviewers: hfinkel, RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: nemanjai, kbarton, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44870
llvm-svn: 329535
VSX D-form load/store instructions of POWER9 require the offset be a multiple of 16 and a helper`isOffsetMultipleOf` is used to check this.
So far, the helper handles FrameIndex + offset case, but not handling FrameIndex without offset case. Due to this, we are missing opportunities to exploit D-form instructions when accessing an object or array allocated on stack.
For example, x-form store (stxvx) is used for int a[4] = {0}; instead of d-form store (stxv). For larger arrays, D-form instruction is not used when accessing the first 16-byte. Using D-form instructions reduces register pressure as well as instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45079
llvm-svn: 329377
Currently EVT is in the IR layer only because of Function.cpp needing a very small piece of the functionality of EVT::getEVTString(). The rest of EVT is used in codegen making CodeGen a better place for it.
The previous code converted a Type* to EVT and then called getEVTString. This was only expected to handle the primitive types from Type*. Since there only a few primitive types, we can just print them as strings directly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45017
llvm-svn: 328806
This is used by llvm tblgen as well as by LLVM Targets, so the only
common place is Support for now. (maybe we need another target for these
sorts of things - but for now I'm at least making them correct & we can
make them better if/when people have strong feelings)
llvm-svn: 328395
This patch adds new load/store instructions for integer scalar types
which can be used for X-Form when fed by add with an @tls relocation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43315
llvm-svn: 327635
The instruction sequence used to get the address of the PC into a GPR requires
that we clobber the link register. Doing so without having first saved it in
the prologue leaves the function unable to return. Currently, this sequence is
emitted into the entry block. To ensure the prologue is inserted before this
sequence, disable shrink-wrapping.
This fixes PR33547.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43677
llvm-svn: 325972
Work towards the unification of MIR and debug output by printing
`@foo` instead of `<ga:@foo>`.
Also print target flags in the MIR format since most of them are used on
global address operands.
Only debug syntax is affected.
llvm-svn: 320682
The last of the three patches that https://reviews.llvm.org/D40348 was
broken up into.
Canonicalize the materialization of constants so that they are more likely
to be CSE'd regardless of the bit-width of the use. If a constant can be
materialized using PPC::LI, materialize it the same way always.
For example:
li 4, -1
li 4, 255
li 4, 65535
are equivalent if the uses only use the low byte. Canonicalize it to the
first form.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40348
llvm-svn: 320473
This re-commits everything that was pulled in r314244. The transformation
is off by default (patch to enable it to follow). The code is refactored
to have a single entry-point and provide fine-grained control over patterns
that it selects. This patch also fixes the bugs in the original code.
Everything that failed with the original patch has been re-tested with this
patch (with the transformation turned on). So the patch to turn this on is
soon to follow.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38575
llvm-svn: 319434
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format,
always print registers as lowercase.
* Only debug printing is affected. It now follows MIR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40417
llvm-svn: 319187
All these headers already depend on CodeGen headers so moving them into
CodeGen fixes the layering (since CodeGen depends on Target, not the
other way around).
llvm-svn: 318490
This header includes CodeGen headers, and is not, itself, included by
any Target headers, so move it into CodeGen to match the layering of its
implementation.
llvm-svn: 317647
This patch add a support of ISD::ZERO_EXTEND in PPCDAGToDAGISel::tryBitPermutation to increase the opportunity to use rotate-and-mask by reordering ZEXT and ANDI.
Since tryBitPermutation stops analyzing nodes if it hits a ZEXT node while traversing SDNodes, we want to avoid ZEXT between two nodes that can be folded into a rotate-and-mask instruction.
For example, we allow these nodes
t9: i32 = add t7, Constant:i32<1>
t11: i32 = and t9, Constant:i32<255>
t12: i64 = zero_extend t11
t14: i64 = shl t12, Constant:i64<2>
to be folded into a rotate-and-mask instruction.
Such case often happens in array accesses with logical AND operation in the index, e.g. array[i & 0xFF];
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37514
llvm-svn: 314655
In the past while, I've committed a number of patches in the PowerPC back end
aimed at eliminating comparison instructions. However, this causes some failures
in proprietary source and these issues are not observed in SPEC or any open
source packages I've been able to run.
As a result, I'm pulling the entire series and will refactor it to:
- Have a single entry point for easy control
- Have fine-grained control over which patterns we transform
A side-effect of this is that test cases for these patches (and modified by
them) are XFAIL-ed. This is a temporary measure as it is counter-productive
to remove/modify these test cases and then have to modify them again when
the refactored patch is recommitted.
The failure will be investigated in parallel to the refactoring effort and
the recommit will either have a fix for it or will leave this transformation
off by default until the problem is resolved.
llvm-svn: 314244
As mentioned in https://reviews.llvm.org/D33718, this simply adds another
pattern to the compare elimination sequence and is committed without a
differential review.
llvm-svn: 314106
As mentioned in https://reviews.llvm.org/D33718, this simply adds another
pattern to the compare elimination sequence and is committed without a
differential review.
llvm-svn: 314073
As mentioned in https://reviews.llvm.org/D33718, this simply adds another
pattern to the compare elimination sequence and is committed without a
differential revision.
llvm-svn: 314062
As mentioned in https://reviews.llvm.org/D33718, this simply adds another
pattern to the compare elimination sequence and is committed without a
differential revision.
llvm-svn: 314060
As mentioned in https://reviews.llvm.org/D33718, this simply adds another
pattern to the compare elimination sequence and is committed without a
differential revision.
llvm-svn: 314055
This patch re-commits the patch that was pulled out due to a
problem it caused, but with a fix for the problem. The fix
was reviewed separately by Eric Christopher and Hal Finkel.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38054
llvm-svn: 313978
The lxv/stxv instructions require an offset that is 0 % 16. Previously we were
selecting lxv/stxv for loads and stores to the stack where the offset from the
slot was a multiple of 16, but the stack slot was not 16 or more byte aligned.
When the frame gets lowered these transform to r(1|31) + slot + offset.
If slot is not aligned, slot + offset may not be 0 % 16.
Now we require 16 byte or more alignment for select lxv/stxv to stack slots.
Includes a testcase that shows both sufficiently and insufficiently aligned
stack slots.
llvm-svn: 312843
- recommitting after fixing a test failure on MacOS
On PPC64, OR (XOR) with a 32-bit immediate can be done with only two instructions, i.e. ori + oris.
But the current LLVM generates three or four instructions for this purpose (and also it clobbers one GPR).
This patch makes PPC backend generate ori + oris (xori + xoris) for OR (XOR) with a 32-bit immediate.
e.g. (x | 0xFFFFFFFF) should be
ori 3, 3, 65535
oris 3, 3, 65535
but LLVM generates without this patch
li 4, 0
oris 4, 4, 65535
ori 4, 4, 65535
or 3, 3, 4
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34757
llvm-svn: 311538
On PPC64, OR (XOR) with a 32-bit immediate can be done with only two instructions, i.e. ori + oris.
But the current LLVM generates three or four instructions for this purpose (and also it clobbers one GPR).
This patch makes PPC backend generate ori + oris (xori + xoris) for OR (XOR) with a 32-bit immediate.
e.g. (x | 0xFFFFFFFF) should be
ori 3, 3, 65535
oris 3, 3, 65535
but LLVM generates without this patch
li 4, 0
oris 4, 4, 65535
ori 4, 4, 65535
or 3, 3, 4
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34757
llvm-svn: 311526
introduce a miscompile bug.
There appears to be a bug where the generated code to extract the sign
bit doesn't work correctly for 32-bit inputs. I've replied to the
original commit pointing out the problem. I think I see by inspection
(and reading the manual for PPC) how to fix this, but I can't be 100%
confident and I also don't know what the best way to test this is.
Currently it seems nearly impossible to get the backend to hit this code
path, but the patch autohr is likely in a better position to craft such
test cases than I am, and based on where the bug is it should be easily
done.
Original commit message for r310346:
"""
[PowerPC] Eliminate compares - add i32 sext/zext handling for SETLE/SETGE
Adds handling for SETLE/SETGE comparisons on i32 values. Furthermore, it
adds the handling for the special case where RHS == 0.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34048
"""
llvm-svn: 310809
Adds handling for SETLE/SETGE comparisons on i32 values. Furthermore, it adds
the handling for the special case where RHS == 0.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34048
llvm-svn: 310346