Fix the values of BPF_X and BPF_K according to BPFInstrFormats.td:
"
def BPF_K : BPFSrcType<0x0>;
def BPF_X : BPFSrcType<0x1>;
"
The right value for BPF_X is 0x1, and the right value for BPF_K is 0x0.
Signed-off-by: Wang YanQing <udknight@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61512
llvm-svn: 359904
The x/y/z suffix is needed to disambiguate the memory form in at&t syntax since no xmm/ymm/zmm register is mentioned.
But we should also allow it for the register and broadcast forms where its not needed for consistency. This matches gas.
The printing code will still only use the suffix for the memory form where it is needed.
llvm-svn: 359903
Summary: This patch was previously applied in r231221, and reverted in
r231254 because it broke self-hosting. It was subsequently fixed and
reapplied in r231274. Unfortunately, making the `parser<T>` classes
final prevents inheritance which makes it impossible to implement
custom parsers.
Reverting r231221 restores the ability to customize parsers.
Reviewers: dblaikie
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Subscribers: craig.topper, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60955
llvm-svn: 359902
The VOP3 form should always be the preferred selection form to be
shrunk later.
The r600 sub test needs to be split out because it asserts on the
arguments in the new test during the calling convention lowering.
llvm-svn: 359899
Summary:
Used parallelLevel[] counter to simplify and improve implementation of
the existing standard OpenMP functions. Functions are tested already in
several tests, the patch is NFC.
Reviewers: grokos, gtbercea, kkwli0
Subscribers: guansong, jdoerfert, caomhin, openmp-commits
Tags: #openmp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61459
llvm-svn: 359892
This was broken if the original operand was killed. The kill flag
would appear on both instructions, and fail the verifier. Keep the
kill flag, but remove the operands from the old instruction. This has
an added benefit of really reducing the use count for future folds.
Ideally the pass would be structured more like what PeepholeOptimizer
does to avoid this hack to avoid breaking instruction iterators.
llvm-svn: 359891
When a fold of an immediate into a sub/subrev required shrinking the
instruction, the wrong VOP2 opcode was used. This was using the VOP2
equivalent of the original instruction, not the commuted instruction
with the inverted opcode.
llvm-svn: 359883
Summary:
Both of these attempt to check whether a header guard exists while parsing the
file. However the file is only marked as guarded once clang finishes processing
it. We defer the checks and work until SymbolCollector::finish().
This is ugly and ad-hoc, deferring *all* work might be cleaner.
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, mgrang, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61442
llvm-svn: 359880
Using/updating a dominator tree to match math overflow patterns may be very
expensive in compile-time (because of the way CGP uses a DT), so just handle
the single-block case.
Also, we were restarting the iterator loops when doing the overflow intrinsic
transforms by marking the dominator tree for update. That was done to prevent
iterating over a removed instruction. But we can postpone the deletion using
the existing "RemovedInsts" structure, and that means we don't need to update
the DT.
See post-commit thread for rL354298 for more details:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20190422/646276.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61075
llvm-svn: 359879
Patch adds support for dumping of file headers with llvm-readobj. XCOFF
object files are added to test dumping a well formed file, and dumping
both negative timestamps and negative symbol counts, both of which are
allowed in the XCOFF definition.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60878
llvm-svn: 359878
Summary:
clangd currently prefers declarations from codegen files. This patch
implements that behavior for definition locations. If we have definiton
locations both coming from AST and index, clangd will perform a merging to show
the codegen file if that's the case.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61126
llvm-svn: 359874
This is the second part of the commit fixing PR38917 (hoisting
partitially redundant machine instruction). Most of PRE (partitial
redundancy elimination) and CSE work is done on LLVM IR, but some of
redundancy arises during DAG legalization. Machine CSE is not enough
to deal with it. This simple PRE implementation works a little bit
intricately: it passes before CSE, looking for partitial redundancy
and transforming it to fully redundancy, anticipating that the next
CSE step will eliminate this created redundancy. If CSE doesn't
eliminate this, than created instruction will remain dead and eliminated
later by Remove Dead Machine Instructions pass.
The third part of the commit is supposed to refactor MachineCSE,
to make it more clear and to merge MachinePRE with MachineCSE,
so one need no rely on further Remove Dead pass to clear instrs
not eliminated by CSE.
First step: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54839
Fixes llvm.org/PR38917
Reviewers: RKSimon
Subscribers: hfinkel, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56772
llvm-svn: 359870
Summary:
According to [C128] "Virtual functions should specify exactly one
of `virtual`, `override`, or `final`", I've added override where a
virtual function is overriden but the explicit `override` keyword
was missing. Whenever both `virtual` and `override` were specified,
I removed `virtual`. As C.128 puts it:
> [...] writing more than one of these three is both redundant and
> a potential source of errors.
I anticipate a discussion about whether or not to add `override` to
destructors but I went for it because of an example in [ISOCPP1000].
Let me repeat the comment for you here:
Consider this code:
```
struct Base {
virtual ~Base(){}
};
struct SubClass : Base {
~SubClass() {
std::cout << "It works!\n";
}
};
int main() {
std::unique_ptr<Base> ptr = std::make_unique<SubClass>();
}
```
If for some odd reason somebody removes the `virtual` keyword from the
`Base` struct, the code will no longer print `It works!`. So adding
`override` to destructors actively protects us from accidentally
breaking our code at runtime.
[C128]: https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#c128-virtual-functions-should-specify-exactly-one-of-virtual-override-or-final
[ISOCPP1000]: https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/issues/1000#issuecomment-476951555
Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere, davide, shafik
Reviewed By: teemperor
Subscribers: kwk, arphaman, kadircet, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61440
llvm-svn: 359868
The part which checks whether vla_expr shows up in the variable list
does not pass on non-darwin platforms. Add the appropriate decorator.
llvm-svn: 359867
- Remove a parameter name that was misspelled (OS used for non-stream
parameter)
- Declare operator == (TextEdit, TextEdit) outside the struct, for
consistency with other user-declared ops in our code.
- Fix naming style of a parameter.
llvm-svn: 359866
The warning isn't very useful when the function is an ObjC method.
rdar://problem/41561853
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61147
llvm-svn: 359864
rL358749 added a documentation page in the Markdown format. Currently,
such pages are ignored in the configuration script for manual pages.
This patch fixes that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60964
llvm-svn: 359860
We use to incorrectly use the store size instead of the alloc size when
creating the stack slot for allocas.
On aarch64 this can be demonstrated by allocating weirdly sized types.
For instance, in the added test case, we use an alloca for i19. We used
to allocate a slot of size 24-bit (19 rounded up to the next byte),
whereas we really want to use a full 32-bit slot for this type.
llvm-svn: 359856
Nico Weber