As discussed in the post-commit thread of r347917, this
transform is fighting with an existing transform causing
an infinite loop or out-of-memory, so this is effectively
reverting r347917 and its follow-up r348195 while we
investigate the bug.
llvm-svn: 348604
This change attempts to shrink scalar AND, OR and XOR instructions which take an immediate that isn't inlineable.
It performs:
AND s0, s0, ~(1 << n) -> BITSET0 s0, n
OR s0, s0, (1 << n) -> BITSET1 s0, n
AND s0, s1, x -> ANDN2 s0, s1, ~x
OR s0, s1, x -> ORN2 s0, s1, ~x
XOR s0, s1, x -> XNOR s0, s1, ~x
In particular, this catches setting and clearing the sign bit for fabs (and x, 0x7ffffffff -> bitset0 x, 31 and or x, 0x80000000 -> bitset1 x, 31).
llvm-svn: 348601
When we had dynamic call frames (i.e. sp adjustment around each call) we
were including that adjustment into offsets calculated based on r6, even
though it's only sp that changes. This led to incorrect stack slot
accesses.
llvm-svn: 348591
Adds fatal errors for any target that does not support the Tiny or Kernel
codemodels by rejigging the getEffectiveCodeModel calls.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50141
llvm-svn: 348585
Fix assert about using an undefined physical register in machine instruction verify pass.
The reason is that register flag undef is missing when doing transformation from If Conversion Pass.
```
Bad machine code: Using an undefined physical register
- function: func_65
- basic block: %bb.0 entry (0x10024740738)
- instruction: BCLR killed $cr5lt, implicit $lr8, implicit $rm, implicit undef $x3
- operand 0: killed $cr5lt
LLVM ERROR: Found 1 machine code errors.
```
There are also other existing testcases with same issue. So I add -verify-machineinstrs option to open verifying.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55408
llvm-svn: 348566
If this is not a valid way to assign an SDLoc, then we get this
wrong all over SDAG.
I don't know enough about the SDAG to explain this. IIUC, theoretically,
debug info is not supposed to affect codegen. But here it has clearly
affected 3 different targets, and the x86 change is an actual improvement.
llvm-svn: 348552
This was probably organized as it was because bswap is a unary op.
But that's where the similarity to the other opcodes ends. We should
not limit this transform to scalars, and we should not try it if
either input has other uses. This is another step towards trying to
clean this whole function up to prevent it from causing infinite loops
and memory explosions.
Earlier commits in this series:
rL348501
rL348508
rL348518
llvm-svn: 348534
This patch introduces a new DAGCombiner rule to simplify concat_vectors nodes:
concat_vectors( bitcast (scalar_to_vector %A), UNDEF)
--> bitcast (scalar_to_vector %A)
This patch only partially addresses PR39257. In particular, it is enough to fix
one of the two problematic cases mentioned in PR39257. However, it is not enough
to fix the original test case posted by Craig; that particular case would
probably require a more complicated approach (and knowledge about used bits).
Before this patch, we used to generate the following code for function PR39257
(-mtriple=x86_64 , -mattr=+avx):
vmovsd (%rdi), %xmm0 # xmm0 = mem[0],zero
vxorps %xmm1, %xmm1, %xmm1
vblendps $3, %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # xmm0 = xmm0[0,1],xmm1[2,3]
vmovaps %ymm0, (%rsi)
vzeroupper
retq
Now we generate this:
vmovsd (%rdi), %xmm0 # xmm0 = mem[0],zero
vmovaps %ymm0, (%rsi)
vzeroupper
retq
As a side note: that VZEROUPPER is completely redundant...
I guess the vzeroupper insertion pass doesn't realize that the definition of
%xmm0 from vmovsd is already zeroing the upper half of %ymm0. Note that on
%-mcpu=btver2, we don't get that vzeroupper because pass vzeroupper insertion
%pass is disabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55274
llvm-svn: 348522
The PPC test with 2 extra uses seems clearly better by avoiding this transform.
With 1 extra use, we also prevent an extra register move (although that might
be an RA problem). The general rule should be to only make a change here if
it is always profitable. The x86 diffs are all neutral.
llvm-svn: 348518
This reverts commit r348203 and reapplies D55085 with an additional
GCOV bugfix to make the change NFC for relative file paths in .gcno files.
Thanks to Ilya Biryukov for additional testing!
Original commit message:
Update Diagnostic handling for changes in CFE.
The clang frontend no longer emits the current working directory for
DIFiles containing an absolute path in the filename: and will move the
common prefix between current working directory and the file into the
directory: component.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D55085
llvm-svn: 348512
The AVX512 diffs are neutral, but the bswap test shows a clear overreach in
hoistLogicOpWithSameOpcodeHands(). If we don't check for other uses, we can
increase the instruction count.
This could also fight with transforms trying to go in the opposite direction
and possibly blow up/infinite loop. This might be enough to solve the bug
noted here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20181203/608593.html
I did not add the hasOneUse() checks to all opcodes because I see a perf
regression for at least one opcode. We may decide that's irrelevant in the
face of potential compiler crashing, but I'll see if I can salvage that first.
llvm-svn: 348508
The code emitting AND-subtrees used to check whether any of the operands
was an OR in order to figure out if the result needs to be negated.
However the OR could be hidden in further subtrees and not immediately
visible.
Change the code so that canEmitConjunction() determines whether the
result of the generated subtree needs to be negated. Cleanup emission
logic to use this. I also changed the code a bit to make all negation
decisions early before we actually emit the subtrees.
This fixes http://llvm.org/PR39550
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54137
llvm-svn: 348444
These opcodes are intended to subsume some of the capability of G_MERGE_VALUES,
as it was too powerful and thus complex to add deal with throughout the GISel
pipeline.
G_BUILD_VECTOR creates a vector value from a sequence of uniformly typed
scalar values. G_BUILD_VECTOR_TRUNC is a special opcode for handling scalar
operands which are larger than the destination vector element type, and
therefore does an implicit truncate.
G_CONCAT_VECTOR creates a vector by concatenating smaller, uniformly typed,
vectors together.
These will be used in a subsequent commit. This commit just adds the initial
infrastructure.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53594
llvm-svn: 348430
Mostly NFC, only change is the order of outlined function names.
Loop over the outlined functions instead of walking the candidate list.
This is a bit easier to understand. It's far more natural to create a function,
then replace all of its occurrences with calls than the other way around.
The functions outlined after this do not change, but their names will be
decided by their benefit. E.g, OUTLINED_FUNCTION_0 will now always be the
most beneficial function, rather than the first one seen.
This makes it easier to enforce an ordering on the outlined functions. So,
this also adds a test to make sure that the ordering works as expected.
llvm-svn: 348414
Because we're potentially peeking through a bitcast in this transform,
we need to use overall bitwidths rather than number of elements to
determine when it's safe to proceed.
Should fix:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39893
llvm-svn: 348383
Whenever we effectively take the address of a basic block we need to
manually update that basic block to reflect that fact or later passes
such as tail duplication and tail merging can break the invariants of
the code. =/ Sadly, there doesn't appear to be any good way of
automating this or even writing a reasonable assert to catch it early.
The change seems trivially and obviously correct, but sadly the only
really good test case I have is 1000s of basic blocks. I've tried
directly writing a test case that happens to make tail duplication do
something that crashes later on, but this appears to require an
*amazingly* complex set of conditions that I've not yet reproduced.
The change is technically covered by the tests because we mark the
blocks as having their address taken, but that doesn't really count as
properly testing the functionality.
llvm-svn: 348374
fidelity checking of RIP-based references to basic blocks and other
labels.
These labels are super important for SLH tests so we should keep them
readable in the test cases.
llvm-svn: 348373
This is an initial patch to add a minimum level of support for funnel shifts to the SelectionDAG and to begin wiring it up to the X86 SHLD/SHRD instructions.
Some partial legalization code has been added to handle the case for 'SlowSHLD' where we want to expand instead and I've added a few DAG combines so we don't get regressions from the existing DAG builder expansion code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54698
llvm-svn: 348353
Functions annotated with `__fastcall` or `__attribute__((__fastcall__))`
or `__attribute__((__swiftcall__))` may contain SEH handlers even on
Win64. This matches the behaviour of cl which allows for
`__try`/`__except` inside a `__fastcall` function. This was detected
while trying to self-host clang on Windows ARM64.
llvm-svn: 348337
It looks like MCRegAliasIterator can visit the same physical register twice. When this happens in this code in LICM we end up setting the PhysRegDef and then later in the same loop visit the register again. Now we see that PhysRegDef is set from the earlier iteration so now set PhysRegClobber.
This patch splits the loop so we have one that uses the previous value of PhysRegDef to update PhysRegClobber and second loop that updates PhysRegDef.
The X86 atomic test is an improvement. I had to add sideeffect to the two shrink wrapping tests to prevent hoisting from occurring. I'm not sure about the AMDGPU tests. It looks like the branch instruction changed at end the of the loops. And in the branch-relaxation test I think there is now "and vcc, exec, -1" instruction that wasn't there before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55102
llvm-svn: 348330
We previously disabled this in r323371 because of a bug where we selected an
extending load, but didn't delete the old G_LOAD, resulting in two loads being
generated for volatile loads.
Since we now have dedicated G_SEXTLOAD/G_ZEXTLOAD operations, and that the
tablegen patterns should no longer be able to select (ext(load x)) patterns, it
should be safe to re-enable it.
The old test case should still work as expected.
llvm-svn: 348320
Currently if you use -{start,stop}-{before,after}, it picks
the first instance with the matching pass name. If you run
the same pass multiple times, there's no way to distinguish them.
Allow specifying a run index wih ,N to specify which you mean.
llvm-svn: 348285
This reverts commit r348203.
Reason: this produces absolute paths in .gcno files, breaking us
internally as we rely on them being consistent with the filenames passed
in the command line.
Also reverts r348157 and r348155 to account for revert of r348154 in
clang repository.
llvm-svn: 348279
PR17686 demonstrates that for some targets FP exceptions can fire in cases where the FP_TO_UINT is expanded using a FP_TO_SINT instruction.
The existing code converts both the inrange and outofrange cases using FP_TO_SINT and then selects the result, this patch changes this for 'strict' cases to pre-select the FP_TO_SINT input and the offset adjustment.
The X87 cases don't need the strict flag but generates much nicer code with it....
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53794
llvm-svn: 348251
Add support for ISD::*_EXTEND and ISD::*_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG opcodes.
The extra broadcast in trunc-subvector.ll will be fixed in an upcoming patch.
llvm-svn: 348246
The comment was misplaced, and the code didn't do what the comment indicated,
namely ignoring the varargs portion when computing the local stack size of a
funclet in emitEpilogue. This results in incorrect offset computations within
funclets that are contained in vararg functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55096
llvm-svn: 348222
This moves the stack check logic into a lambda within getOutliningCandidateInfo.
This allows us to be less conservative with stack checks. Whether or not a
stack instruction is safe to outline is dependent on the frame variant and call
variant of the outlined function; only in cases where we modify the stack can
these be unsafe.
So, if we move that logic later, when we're looking at an individual candidate,
we can make better decisions here.
This gives some code size savings as a result.
llvm-svn: 348220
Sanjay Patel