Pointer-sized alignment is sufficient as we only ever read single values
from the table. Otherwise we'd bump the alignment to 16 bytes in the
backend if the vtable is larger than 16 bytes. This is great for
structures that are accessed with vector instructions or copied around, but
that's simply not the case for vtables.
Shrinks the data segment of a Release x86_64 clang by 0.3%. The wins are
larger for i386 and code bases that use vtables more often than we do.
This matches the behavior of GCC 5.
llvm-svn: 217495