Preparation to implement DW_AT_alignment support:
- We pass non-zero align value to DIBuilder only when alignment was forced
- Modify tests to match this change
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24426
llvm-svn: 284679
In r253186, I changed the DIBuilder API to now take size and align
for reference types as well. This was done in preparation for upcoming
changes to the Verifier that will validate that sizes match between
DI types and IR values that are declared as having those types.
This updates clang to actually pass the information through.
llvm-svn: 253190
With this change, most 'g' options are rejected by CompilerInvocation.
They remain only as Driver options. The new way to request debug info
from cc1 is with "-debug-info-kind={line-tables-only|limited|standalone}"
and "-dwarf-version={2|3|4}". In the absence of a command-line option
to specify Dwarf version, the Toolchain decides it, rather than placing
Toolchain-specific logic in CompilerInvocation.
Also fix a bug in the Windows compatibility argument parsing
in which the "rightmost argument wins" principle failed.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13221
llvm-svn: 249655
LLVM r236120 renamed debug info IR constructs to use a `DI` prefix, now
that the `DIDescriptor` hierarchy has been gone for about a week. This
commit was generated using the rename-md-di-nodes.sh upgrade script
attached to PR23080, followed by running clang-format-diff.py on the
`lib/` portion of the patch.
llvm-svn: 236121
This reverts commit r218917, effectively reapplying r218913. Original
commit message follows.
--
Update debug info testcases for an LLVM metadata schema change to fold
metadata constant operands into a single `MDString`.
Part of PR17891.
llvm-svn: 219011
Update debug info testcases for an LLVM metadata schema change to fold
metadata constant operands into a single `MDString`.
Part of PR17891.
llvm-svn: 218913
This addresses several (not all) debug info tests that use explicit metadata
numbers. Wherever the same number appeared more than once in a test I used
a named match to ensure the same number appeared in all those cases (this may
still be overly constraining test cases as they may not have actually cared
about that relationship). For one-off numbers I just replaced them with an
unnamed regex.
This may underconstrain poorly written test cases that were interested in
checking that certain metadata nodes were related but didn't actually match
on all the related nodes numbers.
llvm-svn: 174247
Victor Leschuk