Xcore target ABI requires const data that is externally visible
to be handled differently if it has C-language linkage rather than
C++ language linkage.
Clang now emits ".cp.rodata" section information.
All other externally visible constant data will be placed in the DP section.
llvm-svn: 201144
profitability check due to some other checks in the addressing
mode matcher. I.e., test case for commit r201121.
<rdar://problem/16020230>
llvm-svn: 201132
DS instructions that access local memory can only uses addresses that
are less than or equal to the value of M0. When M0 is uninitialized,
then we experience undefined behavior.
This patch also changes the behavior to emit S_WQM_B64 on pixel shaders
no matter what kind of DS instruction is used.
llvm-svn: 201097
Similarly to the vshrn instructions, these are simple zext/sext + trunc
operations. Using normal LLVM IR should allow for better code, and more sharing
with the AArch64 backend.
llvm-svn: 201093
For A- and R-class processors, r12 is not normally callee-saved, but is for
interrupt handlers. See AAPCS, 5.3.1.1, "Use of IP by the linker".
llvm-svn: 201089
vshrn is just the combination of a right shift and a truncate (and the limits
on the immediate value actually mean the signedness of the shift doesn't
matter). Using that representation allows us to get rid of an ARM-specific
intrinsic, share more code with AArch64 and hopefully get better code out of
the mid-end optimisers.
llvm-svn: 201085
Original commits messages:
Add MRMXr/MRMXm form to X86 for use by instructions which treat the 'reg' field of modrm byte as a don't care value. Will allow for simplification of disassembler code.
Simplify a bunch of code by removing the need for the x86 disassembler table builder to know about extended opcodes. The modrm forms are sufficient to convey the information.
llvm-svn: 201065
This makes the tests more readable by using the -arm-attributes decoding support
in llvm-readobj since that is now available. Change the invocation commands to
be similar to other test and use a more precise triple (the tests only require
ARM EABI support).
llvm-svn: 201029
Before conditional store vectorization/unrolling we had only one
vectorized/unrolled basic block. After adding support for conditional store
vectorization this will not only be one block but multiple basic blocks. The
last block would have the back-edge. I updated the code to use a vector of basic
blocks instead of a single basic block and fixed the users to use the last entry
in this vector. But, I forgot to add the basic blocks to this vector!
Fixes PR18724.
llvm-svn: 201028
The bitcast instruction during constant materialization was not placed correcly
in the presence of phi nodes. This commit fixes the insertion point to be in the
idom instead.
This fixes PR18768
llvm-svn: 201009
According to the AAPCS, when a CPRC is allocated to the stack, all other
VFP registers should be marked as unavailable.
I have also modified the rules for allocating non-CPRCs to the stack, to make
it more explicit that all GPRs must be made unavailable. I cannot think of a
case where the old version would produce incorrect answers, so there is no test
for this.
llvm-svn: 200970
Generalize the AArch64 .td nodes for AssertZext and AssertSext. Use
them to match the relevant pextr store instructions.
The test widen_load-2.ll requires a slight change because with the
stores gone, the remaining instructions are scheduled in a different
order.
Add test cases for SSE4 and AVX variants.
Resolves rdar://13414672.
Patch by Adam Nemet <anemet@apple.com>.
llvm-svn: 200957
mode.
Basically the idea is to transform code like this:
%idx = add nsw i32 %a, 1
%sextidx = sext i32 %idx to i64
%gep = gep i8* %myArray, i64 %sextidx
load i8* %gep
Into:
%sexta = sext i32 %a to i64
%idx = add nsw i64 %sexta, 1
%gep = gep i8* %myArray, i64 %idx
load i8* %gep
That way the computation can be folded into the addressing mode.
This transformation is done as part of the addressing mode matcher.
If the matching fails (not profitable, addressing mode not legal, etc.), the
matcher will revert the related promotions.
<rdar://problem/15519855>
llvm-svn: 200947
There was a problem with the old pattern, so we were copying some
larger immediates into registers when we could have been encoding
them in the instruction.
llvm-svn: 200932
The most important part of this is probably adding any cost at all for
operations like zext <8 x i8> to <8 x i32>. Before they were being
recorded as extremely costly (24, I believe) which made LLVM fall back
on a 4-wide vectorisation of a loop.
It also rebalances the values for sext, zext and trunc. Lacking any
other sane metric that might work across CPU microarchitectures I went
for instructions. This seems to be in reasonable accord with the rest
of the table (sitofp, ...) though no doubt at least one value is
sub-optimal for some bizarre reason.
Finally, separate AVX and AVX2 values are provided where appropriate.
The CodeGen is quite different in many cases.
rdar://problem/15981990
llvm-svn: 200928
The primary motivation for this pass is to separate the call graph
analysis used by the new pass manager's CGSCC pass management from the
existing call graph analysis pass. That analysis pass is (somewhat
unfortunately) over-constrained by the existing CallGraphSCCPassManager
requirements. Those requirements make it *really* hard to cleanly layer
the needed functionality for the new pass manager on top of the existing
analysis.
However, there are also a bunch of things that the pass manager would
specifically benefit from doing differently from the existing call graph
analysis, and this new implementation tries to address several of them:
- Be lazy about scanning function definitions. The existing pass eagerly
scans the entire module to build the initial graph. This new pass is
significantly more lazy, and I plan to push this even further to
maximize locality during CGSCC walks.
- Don't use a single synthetic node to partition functions with an
indirect call from functions whose address is taken. This node creates
a huge choke-point which would preclude good parallelization across
the fanout of the SCC graph when we got to the point of looking at
such changes to LLVM.
- Use a memory dense and lightweight representation of the call graph
rather than value handles and tracking call instructions. This will
require explicit update calls instead of some updates working
transparently, but should end up being significantly more efficient.
The explicit update calls ended up being needed in many cases for the
existing call graph so we don't really lose anything.
- Doesn't explicitly model SCCs and thus doesn't provide an "identity"
for an SCC which is stable across updates. This is essential for the
new pass manager to work correctly.
- Only form the graph necessary for traversing all of the functions in
an SCC friendly order. This is a much simpler graph structure and
should be more memory dense. It does limit the ways in which it is
appropriate to use this analysis. I wish I had a better name than
"call graph". I've commented extensively this aspect.
This is still very much a WIP, in fact it is really just the initial
bits. But it is about the fourth version of the initial bits that I've
implemented with each of the others running into really frustrating
problms. This looks like it will actually work and I'd like to split the
actual complexity across commits for the sake of my reviewers. =] The
rest of the implementation along with lots of wiring will follow
somewhat more rapidly now that there is a good path forward.
Naturally, this doesn't impact any of the existing optimizer. This code
is specific to the new pass manager.
A bunch of thanks are deserved for the various folks that have helped
with the design of this, especially Nick Lewycky who actually sat with
me to go through the fundamentals of the final version here.
llvm-svn: 200903
During DAGCombine visitShiftByConstant assumes that certain binary operations
with only constant operands can always be folded successfully. This is no longer
true when the constant is opaque. This commit fixes visitShiftByConstant by not
performing the optimization for opaque constants. Otherwise we would end up in
an infinite DAGCombine loop.
llvm-svn: 200900
225 is the default value of inline-threshold. This change will make sure
we have the same inlining behavior as prior to r200886.
As Chandler points out, even though we don't have code in our testing
suite that uses cold attribute, there are larger applications that do
use cold attribute.
r200886 + this commit intend to keep the same behavior as prior to r200886.
We can later on tune the inlinecold-threshold.
The main purpose of r200886 is to help performance of instrumentation based
PGO before we actually hook up inliner with analysis passes such as BPI and BFI.
For instrumentation based PGO, we try to increase inlining of hot functions and
reduce inlining of cold functions by setting inlinecold-threshold.
Another option suggested by Chandler is to use a boolean flag that controls
if we should use OptSizeThreshold for cold functions. The default value
of the boolean flag should not change the current behavior. But it gives us
less freedom in controlling inlining of cold functions.
llvm-svn: 200898
Ideally only those transform passes that run at -O0 remain enabled,
in reality we get as close as we reasonably can.
Passes are responsible for disabling themselves, it's not the job of
the pass manager to do it for them.
llvm-svn: 200892
Robert Lytton