With the latest refactoring and code sharing patches landed,
it is possible to unify the value profile implementation between
raw and indexed profile. This is the patch in raw profile reader
that uses the common interface.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15056
llvm-svn: 254677
This change adds support for an optional weight when merging profile data with the llvm-profdata tool.
Weights are specified by adding an option ':<weight>' suffix to the input file names.
Adding support for arbitrary weighting of input profile data allows for relative importance to be placed on the
input data from multiple training runs.
Both sampled and instrumented profiles are supported.
Reviewers: dnovillo, bogner, davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14547
llvm-svn: 254669
Summary: This changes overflow handling during instrumentation profile merge. Rathar than throwing away records that would result in counter overflow, merged counts are instead clamped to the maximum representable value. A warning about counter overflow is still surfaced to the user as before.
Reviewers: dnovillo, davidxl, silvas
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14893
llvm-svn: 254525
Profile readers using incompatible on-disk hash table format can now share the same
implementation and interfaces.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15100
llvm-svn: 254458
This is the last step to enable profile runtime to share the same value prof
data format and reader/writer code with llvm host tools. The VP related
data structures are moved to a section in InstrProfData.inc enabled with macro
INSTR_PROF_VALUE_PROF_DATA, and common API implementations are enabled with
INSTR_PROF_COMMON_API_IMPL. There should be no functional change.
llvm-svn: 254235
Raw profile writer needs to write all data of one kind in one continuous block,
so the buffer needs to be pre-allocated and passed to the writer method in
pieces for function profile data. The change adds the support for raw value data
writing.
llvm-svn: 254219
This is one of the many steps to commonize value profiling support between profile
runtime and compiler/llvm tools.
After this change, profiler runtime now can share the same C APIs to do VP
serialization/deseriazation with LLVM host tools (and produces value data
in identical format between indexed and raw profile).
It is not yet enabled in profiler runtime yet.
Also added a unit test case to test runtime profile data serialization/deserialization
interfaces implemented using common closure code.
llvm-svn: 254110
1. Convert serialization methods using InstrProfRecord as source into C (impl)
interfaces using Closure.
2. Reimplement InstrProfRecord serialization method to use new C interface
as dummy wrapper.
Now it is ready to implement wrapper for runtime value profile data.
(The new code need better source location -- but not changed in this patch to
minimize diffs. )
llvm-svn: 254057
Convert two C++ static member functions to be C APIs. This
is one of the many steps to get ready to share VP writer code
with profiler runtime.
llvm-svn: 253999
The new option is similar to the SampleProfile dump option.
- dump raw/indexed format into text profile format
- merge the profile and output into text profile format.
Note that Value Profiling data text format is not yet designed.
That functionality will be added later.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14894
llvm-svn: 253913
Summary:
This change refactors two aspects of InstrProfRecord:
1) Add a merge() method to InstrProfRecord (previously InstrProfWriter combineInstrProfRecords()) in order to better encapsulate this functionality and to make the InstrProfRecord and SampleRecord APIs more consistent.
2) Make InstrProfRecord mergeValueProfData() a private method since it is only ever called internally by merge().
Reviewers: dnovillo, bogner, davidxl
Subscribers: silvas, vsk, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14786
llvm-svn: 253695
When dumping function samples or writing them out as text format, it
helps if the samples are emitted sorted by source location. The sorting
of the maps is a bit slow, so we only do it on demand.
llvm-svn: 253568
This change introduces an instrumentation intrinsic instruction for
value profiling purposes, the lowering of the instrumentation intrinsic
and raw reader updates. The raw profile data files for llvm-profdata
testing are updated.
llvm-svn: 253484
Summary:
This change tries to make the root cause of instrumented profile data merge failures clearer.
Previous:
$ llvm-profdata merge test_0.profraw test_1.profraw -o test_merged.profdata
test_1.profraw: foo: Function count mismatch
test_1.profraw: bar: Function count mismatch
test_1.profraw: baz: Function count mismatch
...
Changed:
$ llvm-profdata merge test_0.profraw test_1.profraw -o test_merged.profdata
test_1.profraw: foo: Function basic block count change detected (counter mismatch)
Make sure that all profile data to be merged is generated from the same binary.
test_1.profraw: bar: Function basic block count change detected (counter mismatch)
test_1.profraw: baz: Function basic block count change detected (counter mismatch)
...
Reviewers: dnovillo, davidxl, bogner
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14739
llvm-svn: 253384
Indexed profile data as designed today does not guarantee
counter data to be well aligned, so reading needs to use
the slower form (with memcpy). This is less than ideal and
should be improved in the future (i.e., with fixed length
function key instead of variable length name key).
llvm-svn: 253309
Summary:
This change addresses two possible instances of user error / confusion when
merging sampled profile data.
Previously any input that didn't match the raw or processed instrumented format
would automatically be interpreted as instrumented profile text format data.
No error would be reported during the merge.
Example:
If foo-sampled.profdata and bar-sampled.profdata are binary sampled profiles:
Old behavior:
$ llvm-profdata merge foo-sampled.profdata bar-sampled.profdata -output foobar-sampled.profdata
$ llvm-profdata show -sample foobar-sampled.profdata
error: foobar-sampled.profdata:1: Expected 'mangled_name:NUM:NUM', found lprofi
This change adds basic checks for valid input data when assuming text input.
It also makes error messages related to file format validity more specific about
the assumbed profile data type.
New behavior:
$ llvm-profdata merge foo-sampled.profdata bar-sampled.profdata -o foobar-sampled.profdata
error: foo.profdata: Unrecognized instrumentation profile encoding format
Perhaps you forgot to use the -sample option?
Reviewers: bogner, davidxl, dnovillo
Subscribers: davidxl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14558
llvm-svn: 253009
Summary:
This change addresses two possible instances of user error / confusion when
merging sampled profile data.
Previously any input that didn't match the raw or processed instrumented format
would automatically be interpreted as instrumented profile text format data.
No error would be reported during the merge.
Example:
If foo-sampled.profdata and bar-sampled.profdata are binary sampled profiles:
Old behavior:
$ llvm-profdata merge foo-sampled.profdata bar-sampled.profdata -output foobar-sampled.profdata
$ llvm-profdata show -sample foobar-sampled.profdata
error: foobar-sampled.profdata:1: Expected 'mangled_name:NUM:NUM', found lprofi
This change adds basic checks for valid input data when assuming text input.
It also makes error messages related to file format validity more specific about
the assumbed profile data type.
New behavior:
$ llvm-profdata merge foo-sampled.profdata bar-sampled.profdata -o foobar-sampled.profdata
error: foo.profdata: Unrecognized instrumentation profile encoding format
Perhaps you forgot to use the -sample option?
Reviewers: bogner, davidxl, dnovillo
Subscribers: davidxl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14558
llvm-svn: 252916
- Make indexed value profile data more compact by peeling out
the per-site value count field into its own smaller sized array.
- Introduced formal data structure definitions to specify value
profile data layout in indexed format. Previously the layout
of the data is only assumed in the client code (scattered in
three different places : size computation, EmitData, and ReadData
- The new data structure serves as a central place for layout documentation.
- Add interfaces to force BE output for value profile data (testing purpose)
- Add byte swap unit tests
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14401
llvm-svn: 252563
With this change, instrumentation code and reader/write
code related to profile data structs are kept strictly
in-sync. THis will be extended to cfe and compile-rt
references as well.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13843
llvm-svn: 252113
1. Added a set of public interfaces in InstrProfRecord
class to access (read/write) value profile data.
2. Changed IndexedProfile reader and writer code to
use the newly defined interfaces and hide implementation
details.
3. Added a couple of unittests for value profiling:
- Test new interfaces to get and set value profile data
- Test value profile data merging with various scenarios.
No functional change is expected. The new interfaces will also
make it possible to change on-disk format of value prof data
to be more compact (to be submitted).
llvm-svn: 251771
Add a couple of helper methods to make the primary
raw profile reader interface's implementation more
readable. It also hides more format details. This
patch has no functional change.
llvm-svn: 251546
Change InstrProfReaderIndex from typedef into a wrapper
class with helper methods. This makes the index profile
reader code more readable. It also hides the implementation
detail of the index format and make it more flexible to allow
support different (or more than one) format in the future.
llvm-svn: 251491
This is a clean up patch that defines instr prof section and variable
name prefixes in a common header with access helper functions.
clang FE change will be done as a follow up once this patch is in.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13919
llvm-svn: 251058
Nathan Slingerland