Summary:
We now compute a distance from the main file to the symbol header, which
is a weighted count of:
- some number of #include traversals from source file --> included file
- some number of FS traversals from file --> parent directory
- some number of FS traversals from parent directory --> child file/dir
This calculation is performed in the appropriate URI scheme.
This means we'll get some proximity boost from header files in main-file
contexts, even when these are in different directory trees.
This extended file proximity model is not yet incorporated in the index
interface/implementation.
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: mgorny, ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48441
llvm-svn: 336177
Summary:
This allows hovering on keywords that refer to deduced types.
This should cover most useful cases. Not covered:
- auto template parameters: Since this can be instantiated with many types,
it would not be practical to show the types.
- Structured binding: This could be done later to show multiple deduced types
in the hover.
- auto:: (part of concepts): Outside the scope of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Marc-Andre Laperle <marc-andre.laperle@ericsson.com>
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48159
llvm-svn: 336119
Summary:
This provides more structured information that embedders can use for rendering.
ClangdLSPServer continues to call render(), so NFC.
The patch is:
- trivial changes to ClangdServer/ClangdLSPServer
- mostly-mechanical updates to CodeCompleteTests etc for the new API
- new direct tests of render() in CodeCompleteTests
- tiny cleanups to CodeCompletionItem (operator<< and missing initializers)
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48821
llvm-svn: 336094
Summary:
LSP has some presentational fields with limited semantics (e.g. 'detail') and
doesn't provide a good place to return information like namespace.
Some places where more detailed information is useful:
- tools like quality analysis
- alternate frontends that aren't strictly LSP
- code completion unit tests
In this patch, ClangdServer::codeComplete still return LSP CompletionList, but
I plan to switch that soon (should be a no-op for ClangdLSPServer).
Deferring this makes it clear that we don't change behavior (tests stay the
same) and also keeps the API break to a small patch which can be reverted.
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, cfe-commits, jkorous
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48762
llvm-svn: 335980
By recomputing CompilerInvocation instead of copying it.
The problem was caused by the fact that copies of CompilerInvocation
store references to the shared state (DiagnosticOptions) when copied,
causing data races when two different copies are destroyed from
different threads.
llvm-svn: 335836
Summary:
Injected names being ranked too high was just a bug.
The high boost for keywords was intended, but was too much given how useless
keywords are. We should probably boost them on a case-by-case basis eventually.
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48368
llvm-svn: 335723
Summary:
Comments from namespaces that clangd produces are too noisy and often
not useful.
Namespaces have too many redecls and we don't have a good way of
determining which of the comments are relevant and which should be
ignored (e.g. because they come from code generators like the protobuf
compiler).
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48211
llvm-svn: 335718
Summary:
Previously, the strings matched LSP completion pretty closely.
The completion label was a single string, for instance. This made
implementing completion itself easy but makes it hard to use the names
in other way, e.g. pretty-printed name in synthesized
documentation/hover.
It also limits our introspection into completion items, which can only
be as precise as the indexed symbols. This change is a prerequisite to
improvements to overload bundling which need to inspect e.g. signature
structure.
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48475
llvm-svn: 335360
Summary:
The qualified name can be used to match a completion item to its corresponding
symbol. This can be useful for tools that measure code completion quality.
Qualified names are not precise for identifying symbols; we need to figure out a
better way to identify completion items.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48425
llvm-svn: 335334
Summary:
It's almost always identical to Name, and in fact we never used it (we used name
instead).
The only case where they differ is objc method selectors (foo: vs foo:bar:).
We can live with the latter for both name and filterText, so I've made that
change too.
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48375
llvm-svn: 335321
Summary: This allows tools to examine symbols that would be collected in a symbol index. For example, a tool that measures index-based completion quality would be interested in references to symbols that are collected in the index.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48418
llvm-svn: 335218
Summary:
Some URI schemes require a hint path to be provided, and workspace root
path seems to be a good fit.
Reviewers: sammccall, malaperle
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48290
llvm-svn: 335035
Summary:
For completion items that would trigger include insertions (i.e. index symbols
that are not #included yet), add a visual indicator "+" before the completion
label. The inserted headers will appear in the completion detail.
Open to suggestions for better visual indicators; "+" was picked because it
seems cleaner than a few other candidates I've tried (*, #, @ ...).
The displayed header would be like a/b/c.h (without quote) or <vector> for system
headers. I didn't add quotation or "#include" because they can take up limited
space and do not provide additional information after users know what the
headers are. I think a header alone should be obvious for users to infer that
this is an include header..
To align indentation, also prepend ' ' to labels of candidates that would not
trigger include insertions (only for completions where index results are
possible).
Vim:
{F6357587}
vscode:
{F6357589}
{F6357591}
Reviewers: sammccall, ilya-biryukov, hokein
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48163
llvm-svn: 334828
Summary:
Adds a CodeCompleteOption to folds together compatible function/method overloads
into a single item. This feels pretty good (for editors with signatureHelp
support), but has limitations.
This happens in the code completion merge step, so there may be inconsistencies
(e.g. if only one overload made it into the index result list, no folding).
We don't want to bundle together completions that have different side-effects
(include insertion), because we can't constructo a coherent CompletionItem.
This may be confusing for users, as the reason for non-bundling may not
be immediately obvious. (Also, the implementation seems a little fragile)
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47957
llvm-svn: 334822
Summary:
Also move unittest: URI scheme to TestFS so that it can be shared by
different tests.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47935
llvm-svn: 334810
Summary:
This allows dynamic index to have consistent URI schemes with the
static index which can have customized URI schemes, which would make file
proximity scoring based on URIs easier.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47931
llvm-svn: 334809
Summary:
Like the following:
// -------
// =======
// *******
It does not cover all the cases, but those are definitely not very
useful.
Reviewers: sammccall, ioeric, hokein
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48171
llvm-svn: 334807
Summary:
This is a small code change but vastly reduces noise in code completion results.
The intent of allowing this was to let [sc] ~ "strncpy" and [strcpy] ~ "strncpy"
however the benefits for unsegmented names aren't IMO worth the costs.
Test cases should be representative of the changes here.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47950
llvm-svn: 334712
Summary: These have few signals other than being keywords, so the boost is high.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48083
llvm-svn: 334711
Summary:
Caching is now handled by ClangdLSPServer and hidden behind the
GlobalCompilationDatabase interface. This simplifies ClangdServer.
This change also removes the SkipCache flag from addDocument,
which is now obsolete.
No behavioral changes are intended, the clangd binary still caches the
compile commands on the first read.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: mgorny, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48068
llvm-svn: 334585
The Semaphore is currently used to limit the number of concurrently
running tasks. Tracing the wait times will allow to find out how much
time is wasted waiting on other operations to complete.
llvm-svn: 334495
Summary: Macros are terribly spammy at the moment and this offers some relief.
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47936
llvm-svn: 334287
This breaks the OpenFlags enumeration into two separate
enumerations: OpenFlags and CreationDisposition. The first
controls the behavior of the API depending on whether or not
the target file already exists, and is not a flags-based
enum. The second controls more flags-like values.
This yields a more easy to understand API, while also allowing
flags to be passed to the openForRead api, where most of the
values didn't make sense before. This also makes the apis more
testable as it becomes easy to enumerate all the configurations
which make sense, so I've added many new tests to exercise all
the different values.
llvm-svn: 334221
Summary:
Now we have most of Sema's code completion signals incorporated in Quality,
which will allow us to give consistent ranking to sema/index results.
Therefore we can/should stop using Sema priority as an explicit signal.
This fixes some issues like namespaces always having a terrible score.
The most important missing signals are:
- Really dumb/rarely useful completions like:
SomeStruct().^SomeStruct
SomeStruct().^operator=
SomeStruct().~SomeStruct()
We already filter out destructors, this patch adds injected names and
operators to that list.
- type matching the expression context.
Ilya has a plan to add this in a way that's compatible with indexes
(design doc should be shared real soon now!)
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47871
llvm-svn: 334192
Summary: Fix a couple of bugs in tests an in Quality to keep tests passing.
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47815
llvm-svn: 334089
Summary:
This signal is considered a relevance rather than a quality signal because it's
dependent on the query (the fact that it's completion, and implicitly the query
context).
This is part of the effort to reduce reliance on Sema priority, so we can have
consistent ranking between Index and Sema results.
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: klimek, ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47762
llvm-svn: 334026
Eric Liu