Nico Rieck added support for this 32-bit COFF relocation some time ago
for Win64 stuff. It appears that as an oversight, the assembly output
used "foo"@IMGREL32 instead of "foo"@IMGREL, which is what we can parse.
Sadly, there were actually tests that took in IMGREL and put out
IMGREL32, and we didn't notice the inconsistency. Oh well. Now LLVM can
assemble it's own output with slightly more fidelity.
llvm-svn: 218437
Instructions like 'fxsave' and control flow instructions like 'jne'
match any operand size. The loop I added to the Intel syntax matcher
assumed that using a different size would give a different instruction.
Now it handles the case where we get the same instruction for different
memory operand sizes.
This also allows us to remove the hack we had for unsized absolute
memory operands, because we can successfully match things like 'jnz'
without reporting ambiguity. Removing this hack uncovered test case
involving 'fadd' that was ambiguous. The memory operand could have been
single or double precision.
llvm-svn: 216604
The existing matcher has lots of AT&T assembly dialect assumptions baked
into it. In particular, the hack for resolving the size of a memory
operand by appending the four most common suffixes doesn't work at all.
The Intel assembly dialect mnemonic table has ambiguous entries, so we
need to try matching multiple times with different operand sizes, since
that's the only way to choose different instruction variants.
This makes us more compatible with gas's implementation of Intel
assembly syntax. MSVC assumes you want byte-sized operations for the
instructions that we reject as ambiguous.
Reviewed By: grosbach
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4747
llvm-svn: 216481
We would get confused by '@' characters in symbol names, we would
mistake the text following them for the variant kind.
When an identifier a string, the variant kind will never show up inside
of it. Instead, check to see if there is a variant following the
string.
This fixes PR19965.
llvm-svn: 211249
unable to handle cases such as __asm mov eax, 8*-8.
This patch also attempts to simplify the state machine. Further, the error
reporting has been improved. Test cases included, but more will be added to
the clang side shortly.
rdar://13668445
llvm-svn: 179719
memory operands.
Essentially, this layers an infix calculator on top of the parsing state
machine. The scale on the index register is still expected to be an immediate
__asm mov eax, [eax + ebx*4]
and will not work with more complex expressions. For example,
__asm mov eax, [eax + ebx*(2*2)]
The plus and minus binary operators assume the numeric value of a register is
zero so as to not change the displacement. Register operands should never
be an operand for a multiply or divide operation; the scale*indexreg
expression is always replaced with a zero on the operand stack to prevent
such a case.
rdar://13521380
llvm-svn: 178881
Reid Kleckner