(This relands 59337263ab and makes sure comma operator
diagnostics are suppressed in a SFINAE context.)
While at it, add the diagnosis message "left operand of comma operator has no effect" (used by GCC) for comma operator.
This also makes Clang diagnose in the constant evaluation context which aligns with GCC/MSVC behavior. (https://godbolt.org/z/7zxb8Tx96)
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103938
cxx_dr_status.html
I noticed that these two DRs are currently working correctly, so I
added a pair of lit tests that check the AST (which is most useful for
CWG1779, since 'dependent' is really only observable in an ast dump) to
make sure __func__ works correctly in dependent cases, and in lambda
operator().
Also noticed that CWG1762, mostly an 'example' change, works correctly,
so added a test so that it gets marked 'done' as well.
Additionally, I regenerated cxx_dr_status.html, updating it for Clang
13's release, based on the cwg_status.html from August 12, 2021.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109956
While at it, add the diagnosis message "left operand of comma operator has no effect" (used by GCC) for comma operator.
This also makes Clang diagnose in the constant evaluation context which aligns with GCC/MSVC behavior. (https://godbolt.org/z/7zxb8Tx96)
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103938
This improves diagnostic (& important to me, DWARF) accuracy - otherwise
there could be ambiguities between "std::nullptr_t" and some user-defined
type that's /actually/ "nullptr_t" defined in the global namespace.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110044
While at it, add the diagnosis message "left operand of comma operator has no effect" (used by GCC) for comma operator.
This also makes Clang diagnose in the constant evaluation context which aligns with GCC/MSVC behavior. (https://godbolt.org/z/7zxb8Tx96)
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103938
I discovered this quirk when working on some DWARF - AST printing prints
type template parameters fully qualified, but printed template template
parameters the way they were written syntactically, or wholely
unqualified - instead, we should print them consistently with the way we
print type template parameters: fully qualified.
The one place this got weird was for partial specializations like in
ast-print-temp-class.cpp - hence the need for checking for
TemplateNameDependenceScope::DependentInstantiation template template
parameters. (not 100% sure that's the right solution to that, though -
open to ideas)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108794
In LLVM IR, `AlignmentBitfieldElementT` is 5-bit wide
But that means that the maximal alignment exponent is `(1<<5)-2`,
which is `30`, not `29`. And indeed, alignment of `1073741824`
roundtrips IR serialization-deserialization.
While this doesn't seem all that important, this doubles
the maximal supported alignment from 512MiB to 1GiB,
and there's actually one noticeable use-case for that;
On X86, the huge pages can have sizes of 2MiB and 1GiB (!).
So while this doesn't add support for truly huge alignments,
which i think we can easily-ish do if wanted, i think this adds
zero-cost support for a not-trivially-dismissable case.
I don't believe we need any upgrade infrastructure,
and since we don't explicitly record the IR version,
we don't need to bump one either.
As @craig.topper speculates in D108661#2963519,
this might be an artificial limit imposed by the original implementation
of the `getAlignment()` functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108661
This adds the Unicode 13 data for XID_Start and XID_Continue.
The definition of valid identifier is changed in all C++ modes
as P1949 (https://wg21.link/p1949) was accepted by WG21 as a defect
report.
This patch implements paper P0692R1 from the C++20 standard. Disable usual access checking rules to template argument names in a declaration of partial specializations, explicit instantiation or explicit specialization (C++20 13.7.5/10, 13.9.1/6).
Fixes: https://llvm.org/PR37424
This patch also implements option *A* from this paper P0692R1 from the C++20 standard.
This patch follows the @rsmith suggestion from D78404.
Reviewed By: krisb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92024
Before this patch, CXXCtorInitializers that don't typecheck get discarded in
most cases. In particular:
- typos that can't be corrected don't turn into RecoveryExpr. The full expr
disappears instead, and without an init expr we discard the node.
- initializers that fail initialization (e.g. constructor overload resolution)
are discarded too.
This patch addresses both these issues (a bit clunkily and repetitively, for
member/base/delegating initializers)
It does not preserve any AST nodes when the member/base can't be resolved or
other problems of that nature. That breaks invariants of CXXCtorInitializer
itself, and we don't have a "weak" RecoveryCtorInitializer like we do for Expr.
I believe the changes to diagnostics in existing tests are improvements.
(We're able to do some analysis on the non-broken parts of the initializer)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101641
Word on the grapevine was that the committee had some discussion that
ended with unanimous agreement on eliminating relational function pointer comparisons.
We wanted to be bold and just ban all of them cold turkey.
But then we chickened out at the last second and are going for
eliminating just the spaceship overload candidate instead, for now.
See D104680 for reference.
This should be fine and "safe", because the only possible semantic change this
would cause is that overload resolution could possibly be ambiguous if
there was another viable candidate equally as good.
But to save face a little we are going to:
* Issue an "error" for three-way comparisons on function pointers.
But all this is doing really is changing one vague error message,
from an "invalid operands to binary expression" into an
"ordered comparison of function pointers", which sounds more like we mean business.
* Otherwise "warn" that comparing function pointers like that is totally
not cool (unless we are told to keep quiet about this).
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104892
This change caused build errors related to move-only __block variables,
see discussion on https://reviews.llvm.org/D99696
> This expands NRVO propagation for more cases:
>
> Parse analysis improvement:
> * Lambdas and Blocks with dependent return type can have their variables
> marked as NRVO Candidates.
>
> Variable instantiation improvements:
> * Fixes crash when instantiating NRVO variables in Blocks.
> * Functions, Lambdas, and Blocks which have auto return type have their
> variables' NRVO status propagated. For Blocks with non-auto return type,
> as a limitation, this propagation does not consider the actual return
> type.
>
> This also implements exclusion of VarDecls which are references to
> dependent types.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
>
> Reviewed By: Quuxplusone
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99696
This also reverts the follow-on change which was hard to tease apart
form the one above:
> "[clang] Implement P2266 Simpler implicit move"
>
> This Implements [[http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2021/p2266r1.html|P2266 Simpler implicit move]].
>
> Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
>
> Reviewed By: Quuxplusone
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99005
This reverts commits 1e50c3d785 and
bf20631782.
This reworks a small set of tests, as preparatory work for implementing
P2266.
* Run for more standard versions, including c++2b.
* Normalize file names and run commands.
* Adds some extra tests.
New Coroutine tests taken from Aaron Puchert's D68845.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99225
if E is merely instantiation-dependent."
This change leaves us unable to distinguish between different function
templates that differ in only instantiation-dependent ways, for example
template<typename T> decltype(int(T())) f();
template<typename T> decltype(int(T(0))) f();
We'll need substantially better support for types that are
instantiation-dependent but not dependent before we can go ahead with
this change.
This reverts commit e3065ce238.
the nested-name-specifier when determining whether a qualified type is
instantiation-dependent.
Previously reverted in 25a02c3d1a due to
causing us to reject some code. It turns out that the rejected code was
ill-formed (no diagnostic required).
if E is merely instantiation-dependent.
Previously reverted in 34e72a146111dd986889a0f0ec8767b2ca6b2913;
re-committed with a fix to an issue that caused name mangling to assert.
of type- and value-dependency.
A static data member initialized to a constant inside a class template
is no longer considered value-dependent, per DR1413. A const but not
constexpr variable of literal type (other than integer or enumeration)
is no longer considered value-dependent, per P1815R2.
Fix bogus diagnostics that would get confused and think a "no viable
fuctions" case was an "undeclared identifiers" case, resulting in an
incorrect diagnostic preceding the correct one. Use overload resolution
to determine which function we should select when we can find call
candidates from a dependent base class. Make the diagnostics for a call
that could call a function from a dependent base class more specific,
and use a different diagnostic message for the case where the call
target is instead declared later in the same class. Plus some minor
diagnostic wording improvements.
class to the declaring class in a class member access.
This check does not appear to be backed by any rule in the standard (the
rule in question was likely removed over the years), and only ever
produces duplicate diagnostics. (It's also not meaningful because there
isn't a unique declaring class after the resolution of core issue 39.)
same type in multiple base classes.
Not even if the type is introduced by distinct declarations (for
example, two typedef declarations, or a typedef and a class definition).
As Richard Smith pointed out in the review of D90123, both the C and C++
standard call it lvalue and rvalue, so let's stick to the same spelling
in Clang.
When an overloaded member function has a ref-qualifier, like:
class X {
void f() &&;
void f(int) &;
};
we would print strange notes when the ref-qualifier doesn't fit the value
category:
X x;
x.f();
X().f(0);
would both print a note "no known conversion from 'X' to 'X' for object
argument" on their relevant overload instead of pointing out the
mismatch in value category.
At first I thought the solution is easy: just use the FailureKind member
of the BadConversionSequence struct. But it turns out that we weren't
properly setting this for function arguments. So I went through
TryReferenceInit to make sure we're doing that right, and found a number
of notes in the existing tests that improved as well.
Fixes PR47791.
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90123
non-type template parameters.
Create a unique TemplateParamObjectDecl instance for each such value,
representing the globally unique template parameter object to which the
template parameter refers.
No IR generation support yet; that will follow in a separate patch.
Old GCC used to aggressively fold VLAs to constant-bound arrays at block
scope in GNU mode. That's non-conforming, and more modern versions of
GCC only do this at file scope. Update Clang to do the same.
Also promote the warning for this from off-by-default to on-by-default
in all cases; more recent versions of GCC likewise warn on this by
default.
This is still slightly more permissive than GCC, as pointed out in
PR44406, as we still fold VLAs to constant arrays in structs, but that
seems justifiable given that we don't support VLA-in-struct (and don't
intend to ever support it), but GCC does.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89523
The function `TryListConversion` didn't properly validate the following
part of the standard:
Otherwise, if the parameter type is a character array [... ]
and the initializer list has a single element that is an
appropriately-typed string literal (8.5.2 [dcl.init.string]), the
implicit conversion sequence is the identity conversion.
This caused the following call to `f()` to be ambiguous.
void f(int(&&)[1]);
void f(unsigned(&&)[1]);
void g(unsigned i) {
f({i});
}
This issue only occurs when the initializer list had one element.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87561
When casting an enumerate with a fixed bool type the casting should use
an IntegralToBoolean instead of an IntegralCast as is required per Core
Issue 2338.
Fixes PR47055: Incorrect codegen for enum with bool underlying type
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85612
DR2303 fixes the case where the derived-base match for template
deduction is ambiguous if a base-of-base ALSO matches. The canonical
example (as shown in the test) is just like the MSVC implementation of
std::tuple.
This fixes a fairly sizable issue, where if a user inherits from
std::tuple on Windows (with the MS STL), they cannot use that type to
call a function that takes std::tuple.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84048
C++ unqualified name lookup searches template parameter scopes
immediately after finishing searching the entity the parameters belong
to. (Eg, for a class template, you search the template parameter scope
after looking in that class template and its base classes and before
looking in the scope containing the class template.) This is complicated
by the fact that scope lookup within a template parameter scope looks in
a different sequence of places prior to reaching the end of the
declarator-id in the template declaration.
We used to approximate the proper lookup rule with a hack in the scope /
decl context walk inside name lookup. Now we instead compute the lookup
parent for each template parameter scope.
In order to get this right, we now make sure to enter a distinct Scope
for each template parameter scope, and make sure to re-enter the
enclosing class scopes properly when handling delay-parsed regions
within a class.
We weren't re-entering template scopes in the right order, causing this
to break self-host with -fdelayed-template-parsing.
This reverts commit 237c2a23b6.
C++ unqualified name lookup searches template parameter scopes
immediately after finishing searching the entity the parameters belong
to. (Eg, for a class template, you search the template parameter scope
after looking in that class template and its base classes and before
looking in the scope containing the class template.) This is complicated
by the fact that scope lookup within a template parameter scope looks in
a different sequence of places prior to reaching the end of the
declarator-id in the template declaration.
We used to approximate the proper lookup rule with a hack in the scope /
decl context walk inside name lookup. Now we instead compute the lookup
parent for each template parameter scope. This gets the right answer and
as a bonus is substantially simpler and more uniform.
In order to get this right, we now make sure to enter a distinct Scope
for each template parameter scope. (The fact that we didn't before was
already a bug, but not really observable most of the time, since
template parameters can't shadow each other.)
Arthur Eubanks