Some declarations of memcpy (like glibc's for example) are attributed
with notnull which makes it UB for NULL to get passed in, even if the
memcpy count is zero.
To account for this, guard the memcpy with an appropriate precondition.
This should fix the last UBSan bug, exposed by the test suite, in the
COFF linker.
llvm-svn: 263919
LLD type-punned an integral type and a pointer type using a pointer
field. This is problematic because the pointer type has alignment
greater than some of the integral values.
This would be less problematic if a union was used but it turns out the
integral values are only present for a short, transient, amount of time.
Let's remove this undefined behavior by skipping the punning altogether
by storing the state in a separate memory location: a vector which
informs us which symbols to process for weak externs.
llvm-svn: 263918
Just ignore the -rpath-link command line
option in the same way like gold do.
Behavior of lld/gold differs from gnu ld here.
GNU ld tries to resolve undefined symbols in all
shared object files at link time.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18269
llvm-svn: 263876
This is required to get 'clang -flto' to work transparently
with lld. Please refer to the short comment in the code
for a more detailed explanation.
llvm-svn: 263862
Some COFF tests used INT_MIN for the alignment of the directive section.
This is invalid; replace the alignment with something more sensible: 1.
llvm-svn: 263723
-pie
--pic-executable
Create a position independent executable. This is currently only
supported on ELF platforms. Position independent executables are
similar to shared libraries in that they are relocated by the
dynamic linker to the virtual address the OS chooses for them
(which can vary between invocations). Like normal dynamically
linked executables they can be executed and symbols defined in the
executable cannot be overridden by shared libraries.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18183
llvm-svn: 263693
The YAML traits new's when not passed an allocator to parse data.
For atom types, this is a leak as we don't destruct atoms. For
the File here, we do actually destruct File's so that single case of
not using an allocator will be fine.
Should fix a bunch more leaks.
llvm-svn: 263680
In lld we allocate atoms on an allocator and so don't run their
destructors. This means we also shouldn't allocate memory inside
them without that also being on an allocator.
Reviewed by Lang Hames and Rafael Espindola.
llvm-svn: 263677
For now just treat such sections as non-mergeable.
Resubmit r263660 with test fix.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18225
llvm-svn: 263664
The current code for processCIE and processFDE returns out if it sees
any references. The problem with this is that some references could be
explicit in the binary, while others are implicit as they can be
inferred from the content of the EHFrame itself.
This change walks the references we have against the references we
need, and verifies that all explicit references are in the correct place,
and generates any missing implicit ones.
Reviewed by Lang Hames and Nick Kledzik.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15439
llvm-svn: 263590
This fixes a test which exposed an ASan issue.
We assumed that a symbol's section number had a corresponding section
without performing validation.
llvm-svn: 263558
The load configuration directory is a structure whose size varies as the
OS gains additional functionality. To account for this, the structure's
layout begins with a size field; this allows loaders to know which
fields are available.
However, LLD hard-coded the sizes (112 bytes for 64-bit and 64 for
32-bit). This means that we might not inform the loader of all the
pertinent fields or we might claim that there are more fields than are
actually present.
To correctly account for this, the size field must be loaded from the
_load_config_used symbol.
N.B. The COFF spec is either wrong or out of date, the load
configuration directory is not correctly documented in the
specification: it omits the size field.
llvm-svn: 263543
The TLS directory has a different layout depending on the bitness of the
machine the image will run on. LLD would always use the 64-bit TLS
directory for the data directory entry instead of an appropriately sized
TLS directory.
llvm-svn: 263539
Eugene Zelenko