The LLVM dialect type system has been closed until now, i.e. did not support
types from other dialects inside containers. While this has had obvious
benefits of deriving from a common base class, it has led to some simple types
being almost identical with the built-in types, namely integer and floating
point types. This in turn has led to a lot of larger-scale complexity: simple
types must still be converted, numerous operations that correspond to LLVM IR
intrinsics are replicated to produce versions operating on either LLVM dialect
or built-in types leading to quasi-duplicate dialects, lowering to the LLVM
dialect is essentially required to be one-shot because of type conversion, etc.
In this light, it is reasonable to trade off some local complexity in the
internal implementation of LLVM dialect types for removing larger-scale system
complexity. Previous commits to the LLVM dialect type system have adapted the
API to support types from other dialects.
Replace LLVMIntegerType with the built-in IntegerType plus additional checks
that such types are signless (these are isolated in a utility function that
replaced `isa<LLVMType>` and in the parser). Temporarily keep the possibility
to parse `!llvm.i32` as a synonym for `i32`, but add a deprecation notice.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini, silvas, antiagainst
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94178
1. Add new methods to Async runtime API to support yielding async values
2. Add lowering from `async.yield` with value payload to the new runtime API calls
`async.value` lowering requires that payload type is convertible to LLVM and supported by `llvm.mlir.cast` (DialectCast) operation.
Reviewed By: csigg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93592
Previously all SCF to SPIR-V conversion patterns were tested as
the -convert-gpu-to-spirv pass. That obscured the structure we
want. This commit fixed it.
Reviewed By: ThomasRaoux, hanchung
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93488
This commit addresses the issue of lowering affine.for and
affine.parallel having return values. Relevant test cases are also
added.
Signed-off-by: Prateek Gupta <prateek@polymagelabs.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93090
This operation is designed to support partial conversion, more specifically the
IR state in which some operations expect or produce built-in types and some
operations produce and expect LLVM dialect types. It is reasonable for it to
support cast between built-in types and any equivalent that could be produced
by the type conversion. (At the same time, we don't want the dialect to depend
on the type conversion as it could lead to a dependency cycle). Introduce
support for casting from index to any integer type and back, and from memref to
bare pointer or memref descriptor type and back.
Contrary to what the TODO in the code stated, there are no particular
precautions necessary to handle the bare pointer conversion for memerfs. This
conversion applies exclusively to statically-shaped memrefs, so we can always
recover the full descriptor contents from the type.
This patch simultaneously tightens the verification for other types to only
accept matching pairs of types, e.g., i64 and !llvm.i64, as opposed to the
previous implementation that only checked if the types were generally allowed
byt not for matching, e.g. i64 could be "casted" to !llvm.bfloat, which is not
the intended semantics.
Move the relevant test under test/Dialect/LLVMIR because it is not specific to
the conversion pass, but rather exercises an op in the dialect. If we decide
this op does not belong to the LLVM dialect, both the dialect and the op should
move together.
Reviewed By: silvas, ezhulenev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93405
This reverts commit 0d48d265db.
This reapplies the following commit, with a fix for CAPI/ir.c:
[mlir] Start splitting the `tensor` dialect out of `std`.
This starts by moving `std.extract_element` to `tensor.extract` (this
mirrors the naming of `vector.extract`).
Curiously, `std.extract_element` supposedly works on vectors as well,
and this patch removes that functionality. I would tend to do that in
separate patch, but I couldn't find any downstream users relying on
this, and the fact that we have `vector.extract` made it seem safe
enough to lump in here.
This also sets up the `tensor` dialect as a dependency of the `std`
dialect, as some ops that currently live in `std` depend on
`tensor.extract` via their canonicalization patterns.
Part of RFC: https://llvm.discourse.group/t/rfc-split-the-tensor-dialect-from-std/2347/2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92991
This starts by moving `std.extract_element` to `tensor.extract` (this
mirrors the naming of `vector.extract`).
Curiously, `std.extract_element` supposedly works on vectors as well,
and this patch removes that functionality. I would tend to do that in
separate patch, but I couldn't find any downstream users relying on
this, and the fact that we have `vector.extract` made it seem safe
enough to lump in here.
This also sets up the `tensor` dialect as a dependency of the `std`
dialect, as some ops that currently live in `std` depend on
`tensor.extract` via their canonicalization patterns.
Part of RFC: https://llvm.discourse.group/t/rfc-split-the-tensor-dialect-from-std/2347/2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92991
A separate AVX512 lowering pass does not compose well with the regular
vector lowering pass. As such, it is at risk of code duplication and
lowering inconsistencies. This change removes the separate AVX512 lowering
pass and makes it an "option" in the regular vector lowering pass
(viz. vector dialect "augmented" with AVX512 dialect).
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92614
The ops are very similar to the std variants, but support async GPU execution.
gpu.alloc does not currently support an alignment attribute, and the new ops do not have
canonicalizers/folders like their std siblings do.
Reviewed By: herhut
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91698
Introduce a conversion pass from SCF parallel loops to OpenMP dialect
constructs - parallel region and workshare loop. Loops with reductions are not
supported because the OpenMP dialect cannot model them yet.
The conversion currently targets only one level of parallelism, i.e. only
one top-level `omp.parallel` operation is produced even if there are nested
`scf.parallel` operations that could be mapped to `omp.wsloop`. Nested
parallelism support is left for future work.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91982
It is a simple conversion that only requires to change the region argument
types, generalize it from ParallelOp.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91989
The existing implementation of the conversion from SCF Parallel operation to
SCF "for" loops in order to further convert those loops to branch-based CFG has
been cloning the loop and reduction body operations into the new loop because
ConversionPatternRewriter was missing support for moving blocks while replacing
their arguments. This functionality now available, use it to implement the
conversion and avoid cloning operations, which may lead to doubling of the IR
size during the conversion.
In addition, this fixes an issue with converting nested SCF "if" conditionals
present in "parallel" operations that would cause the conversion infrastructure
to stop because of the repeated application of the pattern converting "newly"
created "if"s (which were in fact just moved). Arguably, this should be fixed
at the infrastructure level and this fix is a workaround.
Reviewed By: herhut
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91955
Depends On D89963
**Automatic reference counting algorithm outline:**
1. `ReturnLike` operations forward the reference counted values without
modifying the reference count.
2. Use liveness analysis to find blocks in the CFG where the lifetime of
reference counted values ends, and insert `drop_ref` operations after
the last use of the value.
3. Insert `add_ref` before the `async.execute` operation capturing the
value, and pairing `drop_ref` before the async body region terminator,
to release the captured reference counted value when execution
completes.
4. If the reference counted value is passed only to some of the block
successors, insert `drop_ref` operations in the beginning of the blocks
that do not have reference coutned value uses.
Reviewed By: silvas
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90716
Null types are commonly used as an error marker. Catch them in the constructor
of Operation if they are present in the result type list, as otherwise this
could lead to further surprising behavior when querying op result types.
Fix AsyncToLLVM and StandardToLLVM that were using null types when constructing
operations.
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91770
This commit does the renaming mentioned in the title in order to bring
'spv' dialect closer to the MLIR naming conventions.
Reviewed By: antiagainst
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91792
This commit does the renaming mentioned in the title in order to bring
'spv' dialect closer to the MLIR naming conventions.
Reviewed By: antiagainst
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91797
Make the interface match the one of ConvertToLLVMPattern::getDataPtr() (to be removed in a separate change).
Reviewed By: ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91599
std.alloc only supports memrefs with identity layout, which means we can simplify the lowering to LLVM and compute strides only from (static and dynamic) sizes.
Reviewed By: ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91549
This commit does the renaming mentioned in the title in order to bring
`spv` dialect closer to the MLIR naming conventions.
Reviewed By: antiagainst
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91609
The current code allows strided layouts, but the number of elements allocated is ambiguous. It could be either the number of elements in the shape (the current implementation), or the amount of elements required to not index out-of-bounds with the given maps (which would require evaluating the layout map).
If we require the canonical layouts, the two will be the same.
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache, ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91523
The logic of vector on boolean was missed. This patch adds the logic and test on
it.
Reviewed By: mravishankar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91403
Depends On D89958
1. Adds `async.group`/`async.awaitall` to group together multiple async tokens/values
2. Rewrite scf.parallel operation into multiple concurrent async.execute operations over non overlapping subranges of the original loop.
Example:
```
scf.for (%i, %j) = (%lbi, %lbj) to (%ubi, %ubj) step (%si, %sj) {
"do_some_compute"(%i, %j): () -> ()
}
```
Converted to:
```
%c0 = constant 0 : index
%c1 = constant 1 : index
// Compute blocks sizes for each induction variable.
%num_blocks_i = ... : index
%num_blocks_j = ... : index
%block_size_i = ... : index
%block_size_j = ... : index
// Create an async group to track async execute ops.
%group = async.create_group
scf.for %bi = %c0 to %num_blocks_i step %c1 {
%block_start_i = ... : index
%block_end_i = ... : index
scf.for %bj = %c0 t0 %num_blocks_j step %c1 {
%block_start_j = ... : index
%block_end_j = ... : index
// Execute the body of original parallel operation for the current
// block.
%token = async.execute {
scf.for %i = %block_start_i to %block_end_i step %si {
scf.for %j = %block_start_j to %block_end_j step %sj {
"do_some_compute"(%i, %j): () -> ()
}
}
}
// Add produced async token to the group.
async.add_to_group %token, %group
}
}
// Await completion of all async.execute operations.
async.await_all %group
```
In this example outer loop launches inner block level loops as separate async
execute operations which will be executed concurrently.
At the end it waits for the completiom of all async execute operations.
Reviewed By: ftynse, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89963
This exposes a hook to configure legality of operations such that only
`scf.parallel` operations that have mapping attributes are marked as
illegal. Consequently, the transformation can now also be applied to
mixed forms.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91340
This patch introduces a new conversion pattern for `spv.ExecutionMode`.
`spv.ExecutionMode` may contain important information about the entry
point, which we want to preserve. For example, `LocalSize` provides
information about the work-group size that can be reused. Hence, the
pattern for entry-point ops changes to the following:
- `spv.EntryPoint` is still simply removed
- Info from `spv.ExecutionMode` is used to create a global struct variable,
which looks like:
```
struct {
int32_t executionMode;
int32_t values[]; // optional values
};
```
Reviewed By: mravishankar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89989
VectorInsertDynamicOp in SPIRV dialect
conversion from vector.insertelement to spirv VectorInsertDynamicOp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90927
This revision refactors the way that attributes/types are considered when generating aliases. Instead of considering all of the attributes/types of every operation, we perform a "fake" print step that prints the operations using a dummy printer to collect the attributes and types that would actually be printed during the real process. This removes a lot of attributes/types from consideration that generally won't end up in the final output, e.g. affine map attributes in an `affine.apply`/`affine.for`.
This resolves a long standing TODO w.r.t aliases, and helps to have a much cleaner textual output format. As a datapoint to the latter, as part of this change several tests were identified as testing for the presence of attributes aliases that weren't actually referenced by the custom form of any operation.
To ensure that this wouldn't cause a large degradation in compile time due to the second full print, I benchmarked this change on a very large module with a lot of operations(The file is ~673M/~4.7 million lines long). This file before this change take ~6.9 seconds to print in the custom form, and ~7 seconds after this change. In the custom assembly case, this added an average of a little over ~100 miliseconds to the compile time. This increase was due to the way that argument attributes on functions are structured and how they get printed; i.e. with a better representation the negative impact here can be greatly decreased. When printing in the generic form, this revision had no observable impact on the compile time. This benchmarking leads me to believe that the impact of this change on compile time w.r.t printing is closely related to `print` methods that perform a lot of additional/complex processing outside of the OpAsmPrinter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90512
- Change syntax for FuncOp to be `func <visibility>? @name` instead of printing the
visibility in the attribute dictionary.
- Since printFunctionLikeOp() and parseFunctionLikeOp() are also used by other
operations, make the "inline visibility" an opt-in feature.
- Updated unit test to use and check the new syntax.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90859
- Convert `global_memref` to LLVM::GlobalOp.
- Convert `get_global_memref` to a memref descriptor with a pointer to the first element
of the global stashed in it.
- Extend unit test and a mlir-cpu-runner test to validate the generated LLVM IR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90803
Since SPIR-V module has an optional name, this patch
makes a change to pass it to `ModuleOp` during conversion.
Reviewed By: ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90904
VectorExtractDynamicOp in SPIRV dialect
conversion from vector.extractelement to spirv VectorExtractDynamicOp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90679
When the "after" region of a WhileOp is merely forwarding its arguments back to
the "before" region, i.e. WhileOp is a canonical do-while loop, a simpler CFG
subgraph that omits the "after" region with its extra branch operation can be
produced. Loop rotation from general "while" to "if { do-while }" is left for a
future canonicalization pattern when it becomes necessary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90604
Alex Zinenko