ld64 automatically renames many sections depending on output type and assorted flags. Here, we implement the most common configs. We can add more obscure flags and behaviors as needed.
Depends on D101393
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101395
@thakis pointed out that `mach_header` and `mach_header_64`
actually have the same set of (used) fields, with the 64-bit version
having extra padding. So we can access the fields we need using the
single `mach_header` type instead of using templates to switch between
the two.
I also spotted a potential issue where hasObjCSection tries to parse a
file w/o checking if it does indeed match the target arch... As such,
I've added a quick magic number check to ensure we don't access invalid
memory during `findCommand()`.
Addresses PR50180.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101724
As preparation for a subsequent diff that implements builtin section renaming, define more `constexpr` strings in namespaces `lld::macho::segment_names` and `lld::macho::section_names`, and use them to replace string literals.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101393
This load command records a range spanning from the end of the load
commands to the end of the `__TEXT` segment. Presumably the kernel will encrypt
all this data.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100973
This diff adds initial support for the legacy LC_VERSION_MIN_* load commands.
Test plan: make check-lld-macho
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100523
codesign/libstuff checks that the `__LLVM` segment is directly
before `__LINKEDIT` by checking that `fileOff + fileSize == next segment
fileOff`. Previously, there would be gaps between the segments due to
the fact that their fileOffs are page-aligned but their fileSizes
aren't. In order to satisfy codesign, we page-align fileOff *before*
calculating fileSize. (I don't think codesign checks for the relative
ordering of other segments, so in theory we could do this just for
`__LLVM`, but ld64 seems to do it for all segments.)
Note that we *don't* round up the fileSize of the `__LINKEDIT` segment.
Since it's the last segment, it doesn't need to worry about contiguity;
in addition, codesign checks that the last (hidden) section in
`__LINKEDIT` covers the last byte of the segment, so if we rounded up
`__LINKEDIT`'s size we would have to do the same for its last section,
which is a bother.
While at it, I also addressed a FIXME in the linkedit-contiguity.s test
to cover more `__LINKEDIT` sections.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis, alexshap
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100848
The minuend (but not the subtrahend) can reference a section.
Note that we do not yet properly validate that the subtrahend isn't
referencing a section; I've filed PR50034 to track that.
I've also extended the reloc-subtractor.s test to reorder symbols, to
make sure that the addends are being associated with the minuend (and not
the subtrahend) relocation.
Fixes PR49999.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100804
This diff creates an empty XAR file and copies it into
`__LLVM,__bundle`. Follow-up work will actually populate the contents of
that XAR.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, gkm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100650
This could probably have been part of D99633, but I split it up to make
things a bit more reviewable. I also fixed some bugs in the implementation that
were masked through integer underflows when operating in 64-bit mode.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, gkm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99823
From what I can tell, it's pretty similar to arm64. The two main differences
are:
1. No 64-bit relocations
2. Stub code writes to 32-bit registers instead of 64-bit
Plus of course the various on-disk structures like `segment_command` are using
the 32-bit instead of the 64-bit variants.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, gkm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99822
This could probably have been part of D99633, but I split it up to make
things a bit more reviewable. I also fixed some bugs in the implementation that
were masked through integer underflows when operating in 64-bit mode.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, gkm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99823
From what I can tell, it's pretty similar to arm64. The two main differences
are:
1. No 64-bit relocations
2. Stub code writes to 32-bit registers instead of 64-bit
Plus of course the various on-disk structures like `segment_command` are using
the 32-bit instead of the 64-bit variants.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, gkm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99822
Benchmarking chromium_framework on a 3.2 GHz 16-Core Intel Xeon W Mac Pro:
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 20 4.33 4.42 4.37 4.37 0.021026299
+ 20 4.12 4.23 4.18 4.175 0.035318103
Difference at 95.0% confidence
-0.195 +/- 0.0186025
-4.46224% +/- 0.425686%
(Student's t, pooled s = 0.0290644)
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, gkm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99998
The main challenge was handling the different on-disk structures (e.g.
`mach_header` vs `mach_header_64`). I tried to strike a balance between
sprinkling `target->wordSize == 8` checks everywhere (branchy = slow, and ugly)
and templatizing everything (causes code bloat, also ugly). I think I struck a
decent balance by judicious use of type erasure.
Note that LLD-ELF has a similar architecture, though it seems to use more templating.
Linking chromium_framework takes about the same time before and after this
change:
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 20 4.52 4.67 4.595 4.5945 0.044423204
+ 20 4.5 4.71 4.575 4.582 0.056344803
No difference proven at 95.0% confidence
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, oontvoo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99633
This reuses the approach (and some code) from LLD-ELF.
It's a decent win when linking chromium_framework on a Mac Pro (3.2 GHz 16-Core Intel Xeon W):
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 20 4.58 4.83 4.66 4.6685 0.066591844
+ 20 4.42 4.61 4.5 4.505 0.04751731
Difference at 95.0% confidence
-0.1635 +/- 0.0370242
-3.5022% +/- 0.793064%
(Student's t, pooled s = 0.0578462)
The output binary is 381MB.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, oontvoo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99279
Within `lld/macho/`, only `InputFiles.cpp` and `Symbols.h` require the `macho::` namespace qualifier to disambiguate references to `class Symbol`.
Add braces to outer `for` of a 5-level single-line `if`/`for` nest.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99555
Pretty simple code-wise. Also threw in some refactoring:
* Put the functionStartSection under Writer instead of InStruct, since
it doesn't need to be accessed outside of Writer
* Adjusted the test to put all files under the temp dir instead of at
the top-level
* Added some CHECK-LABELs to make it clearer where the function starts
data is
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99112
I added just enough to allow us to see a top-level breakdown of time taken. This
is the result of loading the time-trace output into `chrome:://tracing`:
ef5e8234f3/tracing.png
Reviewed By: oontvoo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99311
Move some functions closer to their uses. Move detailed address-assignment logic out of the otherwise abstract `Writer::run()`. This prepares the ground for a diff to implement branch range extension thunks.
* `SyntheticSections.cpp`
** move `needsBinding()` and `prepareBranchTarget()` into `Writer.cpp`
** move `addNonLazyBindingEntries()` adjacent to its use.
* `Writer.cpp`
** move address-assignment logic from `Writer::run()` into new function `Writer::assignAddresses()`
** move `needsBinding()` and `prepareBranchTarget()` from `SyntheticSections.cpp`
* `Target.h`
** remove orphaned decls of `prepareSymbolRelocation()` and `validateRelocationInfo()` which were moved to other files in earlier diffs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98795
This pleases the codesign
(Otherwise it complains about "function starts data out of place")
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98648
Previously, SyntheticSections.cpp did not have a top-level `using namespace
llvm::MachO` because it caused a naming conflict: `llvm::MachO::Symbol` would
collide with `lld::macho::Symbol`.
`MachO::Symbol` represents the symbols defined in InterfaceFiles (TBDs). By
moving the inclusion of InterfaceFile.h into our .cpp files, we can avoid this
name collision in other files where we are only dealing with LLD's own symbols.
Along the way, I removed all unnecessary "MachO::" prefixes in our code.
Cons of this approach: If TextAPI/MachO/Symbol.h gets included via some other
header file in the future, we could run into this collision again.
Alternative 1: Have either TextAPI/MachO or BinaryFormat/MachO.h use a different
namespace. Most of the benefit of `using namespace llvm::MachO` comes from being
able to use things in BinaryFormat/MachO.h conveniently; if TextAPI was under a
different (and fully-qualified) namespace like `llvm::tapi` that would solve our
problems. Cons: lots of files across llvm-project will need to be updated, and
folks who own the TextAPI code need to agree to the name change.
Alternative 2: Rename our Symbol to something like `LldSymbol`. I think this is
ugly.
Personally I think alternative #1 is ideal, but I'm not sure the effort to do it is
worthwhile, this diff's halfway solution seems good enough to me. Thoughts?
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, oontvoo, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98149
Pointer and reference induction variables of range-based for loops are often const, and code authors often lax about qualifying them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98317
Add first bits for emitting LC_FUNCTION_STARTS.
This is a recommit of f344dfeb with the adjusted test
which should address build bots breakages.
Test plan: make check-all
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97260
Previously, lld/mac only ad-hoc codesigned executables on arm64.
Matches ld64 behavior. Part of PR49443. Fixes 14 of 17 failures when running
check-llvm with lld as host linker on an M1 MBP.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97994
Previously, we were loading re-exports without checking whether
they were compatible with our target. Prior to {D97209}, it meant that
we were defining dylib symbols that were invalid -- usually a silent
failure unless our binary actually used them. D97209 exposed this as an
explicit error.
Along the way, I've extended our TAPI compatibility check to cover the
platform as well, instead of just checking the arch. To this end, I've
replaced MachO::Architecture with MachO::Target in our Config struct.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, oontvoo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97867
This adds support for `-undefined dynamic_lookup`, and for
`-undefined warning` and `-undefined suppress` with `-flat_namespace`.
We just replace undefined symbols with a DynamicLookup when we hit them.
With this, `check-llvm` passes when using ld64.lld.darwinnew as host linker.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97642
Also add a few asserts to verify that we are indeed handling an
UNSIGNED relocation as the minued. I haven't made it an actual
user-facing error since I don't think llvm-mc is capable of generating
SUBTRACTOR relocations without an associated UNSIGNED.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97103
Dynamic lookup symbols are symbols that work like dynamic symbols
in ELF: They're not bound to a dylib like normal Mach-O twolevel lookup
symbols, but they live in a global pool and dyld resolves them against
exported symbols from all loaded dylibs.
This adds support for dynamical lookup symbols to lld/mac. They are
represented as DylibSymbols with file set to nullptr.
This also uses this support to implement the -U flag, which makes
a specific symbol that's undefined at the end of the link a
dynamic lookup symbol.
For -U, it'd be sufficient to just to a pass over remaining undefined symbols
at the end of the link and to replace them with dynamic lookup symbols then.
But I'd like to use this code to implement flat_namespace too, and that will
require real support for resolving dynamic lookup symbols in SymbolTable. So
this patch adds this now already.
While writing tests for this, I noticed that we didn't set N_WEAK_DEF in the
symbol table for DylibSymbols, so this fixes that too.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97521
I've adjusted the RelocAttrBits to better fit the semantics of
the relocations. In particular:
1. *_UNSIGNED relocations are no longer marked with the `TLV` bit, even
though they can occur within TLV sections. Instead the `TLV` bit is
reserved for relocations that can reference thread-local symbols, and
*_UNSIGNED relocations have their own `UNSIGNED` bit. The previous
implementation caused TLV and regular UNSIGNED semantics to be
conflated, resulting in rebase opcodes being incorrectly emitted for TLV
relocations.
2. I've added a new `POINTER` bit to denote non-relaxable GOT
relocations. This distinction isn't important on x86 -- the GOT
relocations there are either relaxable or non-relaxable loads -- but
arm64 has `GOT_LOAD_PAGE21` which loads the page that the referent
symbol is in (regardless of whether the symbol ends up in the GOT). This
relocation must reference a GOT symbol (so must have the `GOT` bit set)
but isn't itself relaxable (so must not have the `LOAD` bit). The
`POINTER` bit is used for relocations that *must* reference a GOT
slot.
3. A similar situation occurs for TLV relocations.
4. ld64 supports both a pcrel and an absolute version of
ARM64_RELOC_POINTER_TO_GOT. But the semantics of the absolute version
are pretty weird -- it results in the value of the GOT slot being
written, rather than the address. (That means a reference to a
dynamically-bound slot will result in zeroes being written.) The
programs I've tried linking don't use this form of the relocation, so
I've dropped our partial support for it by removing the relevant
RelocAttrBits.
Reviewed By: alexshap
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97031
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95913
Usage: -bundle_loader <executable>
This option specifies the executable that will load the build output file being linked.
When building a bundle, users can use the --bundle_loader to specify an executable
that contains symbols referenced, but not implemented in the bundle.
This is an initial base commit for ARM64 target arch support. I don't represent that it complete or bug-free, but wish to put it out for review now that some basic things like branch target & load/store address relocs are working.
I can add more tests to this base commit, or add them in follow-up commits.
It is not entirely clear whether I use the "ARM64" (Apple) or "AArch64" (non-Apple) naming convention. Guidance is appreciated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88629
Note that there is a triple indirection involved with
personalities and compact unwind:
1. Two bits of each CU encoding are used as an offset into the
personality array.
2. Each entry of the personality array is an offset from the image base.
The resulting address (after adding the image base) should point within the
GOT.
3. The corresponding GOT entry contains the actual pointer to the
personality function.
To further complicate things, when the personality function is in the
object file (as opposed to a dylib), its references in
`__compact_unwind` may refer to it via a section + offset relocation
instead of a symbol relocation. Since our GOT implementation can only
create entries for symbols, we have to create a synthetic symbol at the
given section offset.
Reviewed By: clayborg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95809
The Mach kernel & codesign on arm64 macOS has strict requirements for alignment and sequence of segments and sections. Dyld probably is just as picky, though kernel & codesign reject malformed Mach-O files before dyld ever has a chance.
I developed this diff by incrementally changing alignments & sequences to match the output of ld64. I stopped when my hello-world test program started working: `codesign --verify` succeded, and `execve(2)` didn't immediately fail with `errno == EBADMACHO` = `"Malformed Mach-O file"`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94935
This makes our error messages more informative. But the bigger motivation is for
LTO symbol resolution, which will be in an upcoming diff. The changes in this
one are largely mechanical.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94316
Add per-reloc-type attribute bits and migrate code from per-target file into target independent code, driven by reloc attributes.
Many cleanups
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95121
We were mishandling the case where both `__tbss` and `__thread_data` sections were
present.
TLVP relocations should be encoded as offsets from the start of `__thread_data`,
even if the symbol is actually located in `__thread_bss`. Previously, we were
writing the offset from the start of the containing section, which doesn't
really make sense since there's no way `tlv_get_addr()` can know which section a
given `tlv$init` symbol is in at runtime.
In addition, this patch ensures that we place `__thread_data` immediately before
`__thread_bss`. This is what ld64 does, likely for performance reasons. Zerofill
sections must also be at the end of their segments; we were already doing this,
but now we ensure that `__thread_bss` occurs before `__bss`, so that it's always
possible to have it contiguous with `__thread_data`.
Fixes llvm.org/PR48657.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94329
Also remove iteration over ArchiveFile symbols in buildInputSectionPriorities --
that was rendered unnecessary after D92539, which included ObjFiles from
ArchiveFiles inside the `inputFiles` vector.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93569
TREATMENT can be `error`, `warning`, `suppress`, or `dynamic_lookup`
The `dymanic_lookup` remains unimplemented for now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93263
Note that dylibs without *any* refs will still be loaded in the usual
(strong) fashion.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93435
This was causing a crash as we were attempting to look up the
nonexistent parent OutputSection of the debug sections. We didn't detect
it earlier because there was no test for PIEs with debug info (PIEs
require us to emit rebases for X86_64_RELOC_UNSIGNED).
This diff filters out the debug sections while loading the ObjFiles. In
addition to fixing the above problem, it also lets us avoid doing
redundant work -- we no longer parse / apply relocations / attempt to
emit dyld opcodes for these sections that we don't emit.
Fixes llvm.org/PR48392.
Reviewed By: thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92904
15% faster for linking Chromium's base_unittests.txt, according to ministat:
```
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 10 0.650213 0.69287586 0.65793395 0.66127126 0.012365407
+ 10 0.54993701 0.59006906 0.55885506 0.56146643 0.013215349
Difference at 95.0% confidence
-0.0998048 +/- 0.0120244
-15.0929% +/- 1.81838%
(Student's t, pooled s = 0.0127974)
```
And matches what we do on the other ports.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92736
Also, for .o files, include full path as given on link command line.
Before:
lld: error: undefined symbol [...], referenced from sandbox_logging.o
After:
lld: error: undefined symbol [...], referenced from libseatbelt.a(sandbox_logging.o)
Move archiveName up to InputFile so we can consistently use toString()
to print InputFiles in diags, and pass it to the ObjFile ctor. This
matches the ELF and COFF ports.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92437
Symbols of the same type must be laid out contiguously: following ld64's
lead, we choose to emit all local symbols first, then external symbols,
and finally undefined symbols. For each symbol type, the LC_DYSYMTAB
load command will record the range (start index and total number) of
those symbols in the symbol table.
This work was motivated by the fact that LLDB won't search for debug
info if LC_DYSYMTAB says there are no local symbols (since STABS symbols
are all local symbols). With this change, LLDB is now able to display
the source lines at a given breakpoint when debugging our binaries.
Some tests had to be updated due to local symbol names now appearing in
`llvm-objdump`'s output.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai, clayborg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89285
Debug sections contain a large amount of data. In order not to bloat the size
of the final binary, we remove them and instead emit STABS symbols for
`dsymutil` and the debugger to locate their contents in the object files.
With this diff, `dsymutil` is able to locate the debug info. However, we need
a few more features before `lldb` is able to work well with our binaries --
e.g. having `LC_DYSYMTAB` accurately reflect the number of local symbols,
emitting `LC_UUID`, and more. Those will be handled in follow-up diffs.
Note also that the STABS we emit differ slightly from what ld64 does. First, we
emit the path to the source file as one `N_SO` symbol instead of two. (`ld64`
emits one `N_SO` for the dirname and one of the basename.) Second, we do not
emit `N_BNSYM` and `N_ENSYM` STABS to mark the start and end of functions,
because the `N_FUN` STABS already serve that purpose. @clayborg recommended
these changes based on his knowledge of what the debugging tools look for.
Additionally, this current implementation doesn't accurately reflect the size
of function symbols. It uses the size of their containing sectioins as a proxy,
but that is only accurate if `.subsections_with_symbols` is set, and if there
isn't an `N_ALT_ENTRY` in that particular subsection. I think we have two
options to solve this:
1. We can split up subsections by symbol even if `.subsections_with_symbols`
is not set, but include constraints to ensure those subsections retain
their order in the final output. This is `ld64`'s approach.
2. We could just add a `size` field to our `Symbol` class. This seems simpler,
and I'm more inclined toward it, but I'm not sure if there are use cases
that it doesn't handle well. As such I'm punting on the decision for now.
Reviewed By: clayborg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89257
This patch:
- adds an ld64.lld.darwinnew symlink for lld, to go with f2710d4b57,
so that `clang -fuse-ld=lld.darwinnew` can be used to test new
Mach-O lld while it's in bring-up. (The expectation is that we'll
remove this again once new Mach-O lld is the defauld and only Mach-O
lld.)
- lets the clang driver know if the linker is lld (currently
only triggered if `-fuse-ld=lld` or `-fuse-ld=lld.darwinnew` is
passed). Currently only used for the next point, but could be used
to implement other features that need close coordination between
compiler and linker, e.g. having a diag for calling `clang++` instead
of `clang` when link errors are caused by a missing C++ stdlib.
- lets the clang driver pass `-demangle` to Mach-O lld (both old and
new), in addition to ld64
- implements -demangle for new Mach-O lld
- changes demangleItanium() to accept _Z, __Z, ___Z, ____Z prefixes
(and updates one test added in D68014). Mach-O has an extra
underscore for symbols, and the three (or, on Mach-O, four)
underscores are used for block names.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91884
Apple devtools use this to locate the dSYM files for a given
binary.
The UUID is computed based on an MD5 hash of the binary's contents. In order to
hash the contents, we must first write them, but LC_UUID itself must be part of
the written contents in order for all the offsets to be calculated correctly.
We resolve this circular paradox by first writing an LC_UUID with an all-zero
UUID, then updating the UUID with its real value later.
I'm not sure there's a good way to test that the value of the UUID is
"as expected", so I've just checked that it's present.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, compnerd, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89418
Apparently this is used in real programs. I've handled this by reusing
the logic we already have for branch (function call) relocations.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87852
Not 100% sure but it appears that bundles are almost identical to
dylibs, aside from the fact that they do not contain `LC_ID_DYLIB`. ld64's code
seems to treat bundles and dylibs identically in most places.
Supporting bundles allows us to run e.g. XCTests, as all test suites are
compiled into bundles which get dynamically loaded by the `xctest` test runner.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87856
* Implement rebase opcodes. Rebase opcodes tell dyld where absolute
addresses have been encoded in the binary. If the binary is not loaded
at its preferred address, dyld has to rebase these addresses by adding
an offset to them.
* Support `-pie` and use it to test rebase opcodes.
This is necessary for absolute address references in dylibs, bundles etc
to work.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, gkm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87199
They cause their corresponding libraries / frameworks to be loaded via
`LC_LOAD_WEAK_DYLIB` instead of `LC_LOAD_DYLIB`.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, gkm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87929
Digest the input `__LD,__compact_unwind` and produce the output `__TEXT,__unwind_info`. This is the initial commit with the major functionality.
Successor commits will add handling for ...
* `__TEXT,__eh_frame`
* personalities & LSDA
* `-r` pass-through
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86805
These opcodes tell dyld to coalesce the overridden weak dysyms to this
particular symbol definition.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86575
Since there is no "weak lazy" lookup, function calls to weak symbols are
always non-lazily bound. We emit both regular non-lazy bindings as well
as weak bindings, in order that the weak bindings may overwrite the
non-lazy bindings if an appropriate symbol is found at runtime. However,
the bound addresses will still be written (non-lazily) into the
LazyPointerSection.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86573
Previously, we were only emitting regular bindings to weak
dynamic symbols; this diff adds support for the weak bindings too, which
can overwrite the regular bindings at runtime. We also treat weak
defined global symbols similarly -- since they can also be interposed at
runtime, they need to be treated as potentially dynamic symbols.
Note that weak bindings differ from regular bindings in that they do not
specify the dylib to do the lookup in (i.e. weak symbol lookup happens
in a flat namespace.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86572
Previously, the BindingEntry struct could only store bindings to offsets
within InputSections. Since the GOTSection and TLVPointerSections are
OutputSections, I handled those in a separate code path. However, this
makes it awkward to support weak bindings properly without code
duplication. This diff allows BindingEntries to point directly to
OutputSections, simplifying the upcoming weak binding implementation.
Along the way, I also converted a bunch of functions taking references
to symbols to take pointers instead. Given how much casting we do for
Symbol (especially in the upcoming weak binding diffs), it's cleaner
this way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86571
Pretty straightforward; just emits LC_RPATH for dyld to consume.
Note that lld itself does not yet support dylib lookup via @rpath.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, compnerd
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85701
References to symbols in dylibs work very similarly regardless of
whether the symbol is a TLV. The main difference is that we have a
separate `__thread_ptrs` section that acts as the GOT for these
thread-locals.
We can identify thread-locals in dylibs by a flag in their export trie
entries, and we cross-check it with the relocations that refer to them
to ensure that we are not using a GOT relocation to reference a
thread-local (or vice versa).
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85081
codesign (or more specifically libstuff) checks that each section in
__LINKEDIT ends where the next one starts -- no gaps are permitted. This
diff achieves it by aligning every section's start and end points to
WordSize.
Remarks: ld64 appears to satisfy the constraint by adding padding bytes
when generating the __LINKEDIT data, e.g. by emitting BIND_OPCODE_DONE
(which is a 0x0 byte) repeatedly. I think the approach this diff takes
is a bit more elegant, but I'm not sure if it's too restrictive. In
particular, it assumes padding always uses the zero byte. But we can
revisit this later.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, compnerd
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84718
The C++ ABI requires dylibs to pass a pointer to __cxa_atexit which does
e.g. cleanup of static global variables. The C++ spec says that the pointer
can point to any address in one of the dylib's segments, but in practice
ld64 seems to set it to point to the header, so that's what's implemented
here.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83603
The previous approach of adding up the file sizes of the
component sections ignored the fact that the sections did not have to be
contiguous in the file. As such, it was underestimating the true size.
I discovered this issue because `codesign` checks whether `__LINKEDIT`
extends to the end of the file. Since we were underestimating segment
sizes, this check failed.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, compnerd
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84574
Previously, we only supported binding dysyms to the GOT. This
diff adds support for binding them to any arbitrary section. C++
programs appear to use this, I believe for vtables and type_info.
This diff also makes our bind opcode encoding a bit smarter -- we now
encode just the differences between bindings, which will make things
more compact.
I was initially concerned about the performance overhead of iterating
over these relocations, but it turns out that the number of such
relocations is small. A quick analysis of my llvm-project build
directory showed that < 1.3% out of ~7M relocations are RELOC_UNSIGNED
bindings to symbols (including both dynamic and static symbols).
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83103
Summary:
ld64 does this, and references an internal rdar:// number as an explanation. No
idea what that rdar issue is, but in practice, it seems that not putting a BSS
section at the end can cause subsequent sections in the same segment to be
overwritten with zeroes.
Reviewers: #lld-macho
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81888
Summary:
There were a few issues with the previous setup:
1. The section sorting comparator used a declarative map of section names to
determine the correct order, but it turns out we need to match on more than
just names -- in particular, an upcoming diff will sort based on whether the
S_ZERO_FILL flag is set. This diff changes the sorter to a more imperative but
flexible form.
2. We were sorting OutputSections stored in a MapVector, which left the
MapVector in an inconsistent state -- the wrong keys map to the wrong values!
In practice, we weren't doing key lookups (only container iteration) after the
sort, so this was fine, but it was still a dubious state of affairs. This diff
copies the OutputSections to a vector before sorting them.
3. We were adding unneeded OutputSections to OutputSegments and then filtering
them out later, which meant that we had to remember whether an OutputSegment
was in a pre- or post-filtered state. This diff only adds the sections to the
segments if they are needed.
In addition to those major changes, two minor ones worth noting:
1. I renamed all OutputSection variable names to `osec`, to parallel `isec`.
Previously we were using some inconsistent combination of `osec`, `os`, and
`section`.
2. I added a check (and a test) for InputSections with names that clashed with
those of our synthetic OutputSections.
Reviewers: #lld-macho
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81887
Summary:
llvm-mc emits `__bss` sections with an offset of zero, but we weren't expecting
that in our input, so we were copying non-zero data from the start of the file and
putting it in `__bss`, with obviously undesirable runtime results. (It appears that
the kernel will copy those nonzero bytes as long as the offset is nonzero, regardless
of whether S_ZERO_FILL is set.)
I debated on whether to make a special ZeroFillSection -- separate from a
regular InputSection -- but it seemed like too much work for now. But I'm happy
to refactor if anyone feels strongly about having it as a separate class.
Depends on D80857.
Reviewers: ruiu, pcc, MaskRay, smeenai, alexshap, gkm, Ktwu, christylee
Reviewed By: smeenai
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80859
Summary:
Turns out this case is actually really common -- it happens whenever there's
a reference to an `extern` variable that ends up statically linked.
Depends on D80856.
Reviewers: ruiu, pcc, MaskRay, smeenai, alexshap, gkm, Ktwu, christylee
Reviewed By: smeenai
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80857
Add support to lld to use Text Based API stubs for linking. This is
support is incomplete not filtering out platforms. It also does not
account for architecture specific API handling and potentially does not
correctly handle trees of re-exports with inlined libraries being
treated as direct children of the top level library.
My test refactoring in D80217 seems to have caused yaml2obj to emit
unaligned nlist_64 structs, causing ASAN'd lld to be unhappy. I don't
think this is an issue with yaml2obj though -- llvm-mc also seems to
emit unaligned nlist_64s. This diff makes lld able to safely do aligned
reads under ASAN builds while hopefully creating no overhead for regular
builds on architectures that support unaligned reads.
Reviewed By: thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80414
That's what ld64 uses for 64-bit targets. I figured it's best to make
this change sooner rather than later since a bunch of our tests are
relying on hardcoded addresses that depend on this value.
Reviewed By: smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80177
The order file indicates how input sections should be sorted within each
output section, based on the symbols contained within those sections.
This diff sets the stage for implementing and testing
`.subsections_via_symbols`, where we will break up InputSections by each
symbol and sort them more granularly.
Reviewed By: smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79668
This unblocks the linking of real programs, since many core system
functions are only available as sub-libraries of libSystem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79228
Summary:
This diff implements lazy symbol binding -- very similar to the PLT
mechanism in ELF.
ELF's .plt section is broken up into two sections in Mach-O:
StubsSection and StubHelperSection. Calls to functions in dylibs will
end up calling into StubsSection, which contains indirect jumps to
addresses stored in the LazyPointerSection (the counterpart to ELF's
.plt.got).
Initially, the LazyPointerSection contains addresses that point into one
of the entry points in the middle of the StubHelperSection. The code in
StubHelperSection will push on the stack an offset into the
LazyBindingSection. The push is followed by a jump to the beginning of
the StubHelperSection (similar to PLT0), which then calls into
dyld_stub_binder. dyld_stub_binder is a non-lazily bound symbol, so this
call looks it up in the GOT.
The stub binder will look up the bind opcodes in the LazyBindingSection
at the given offset. The bind opcodes will tell the binder to update the
address in the LazyPointerSection to point to the symbol, so that
subsequent calls don't have to redo the symbol resolution. The binder
will then jump to the resolved symbol.
Depends on D78269.
Reviewers: ruiu, pcc, MaskRay, smeenai, alexshap, gkm, Ktwu, christylee
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78270
Summary:
1. Don't have isHidden() depend on isNeeded(). Whether a section is
hidden is orthogonal from whether it is needed: hidden sections will
never have a header regardless of whether they have a body. (I know we
override this method with return false for synthetic sections, but
regardless I think it's confusing to write it this way for non-synthetic
sections.)
2. Don't call writeTo() on unneeded sections. D78270 assumes that this
is true when implementing the stub helper section.
3. Filter out the unneeded sections early on to avoid having to deal
with them in multiple places.
4. Remove assumption in test that the referenced file has no other symbols.
(We should create separate input files for future tests to avoid such
issues.)
Reviewers: ruiu, pcc, MaskRay, smeenai, alexshap, gkm, Ktwu, christylee
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79460
Summary: Similar to other formats, input sections in the MachO
implementation are now grouped under output sections. This is primarily
a refactor, although there's some new logic (like resolving the output
section's flags based on its inputs).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77893
Currently, getVA() returns a virtual address with the assumption that
the ImageBase is zero. As I understand, this is what lld-ELF is doing.
However, under our current design, it seems like an awkward setup --
I'm finding that I have to add and subtract ImageBase in several places
to make things work out.
As such, I think it's simpler to have getVA() return a non-relative VA,
but I'm not sure if I'm missing something. Would love to hear more from
folks familiar with lld-ELF.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78168
This diff implements basic support for writing a symbol table.
Attributes are loosely supported for extern symbols and not at all for
other types.
Initial version by Kellie Medlin <kelliem@fb.com>
Originally committed in a3d95a50ee and reverted in fbae153ca5 due to
UBSAN erroring over unaligned writes. That has been fixed in the
current diff with the following changes:
```
diff --git a/lld/MachO/SyntheticSections.cpp b/lld/MachO/SyntheticSections.cpp
--- a/lld/MachO/SyntheticSections.cpp
+++ b/lld/MachO/SyntheticSections.cpp
@@ -133,6 +133,9 @@ SymtabSection::SymtabSection(StringTableSection &stringTableSection)
: stringTableSection(stringTableSection) {
segname = segment_names::linkEdit;
name = section_names::symbolTable;
+ // TODO: When we introduce the SyntheticSections superclass, we should make
+ // all synthetic sections aligned to WordSize by default.
+ align = WordSize;
}
size_t SymtabSection::getSize() const {
diff --git a/lld/MachO/Writer.cpp b/lld/MachO/Writer.cpp
--- a/lld/MachO/Writer.cpp
+++ b/lld/MachO/Writer.cpp
@@ -371,6 +371,7 @@ void Writer::assignAddresses(OutputSegment *seg) {
ArrayRef<InputSection *> sections = p.second;
for (InputSection *isec : sections) {
addr = alignTo(addr, isec->align);
+ // We must align the file offsets too to avoid misaligned writes of
+ // structs.
+ fileOff = alignTo(fileOff, isec->align);
isec->addr = addr;
addr += isec->getSize();
fileOff += isec->getFileSize();
@@ -396,6 +397,7 @@ void Writer::writeSections() {
uint64_t fileOff = seg->fileOff;
for (auto § : seg->getSections()) {
for (InputSection *isec : sect.second) {
+ fileOff = alignTo(fileOff, isec->align);
isec->writeTo(buf + fileOff);
fileOff += isec->getFileSize();
}
```
I don't think it's easy to write a test for alignment (that doesn't
involve brittly hard-coding file offsets), so there isn't one... but
UBSAN builds pass now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79050
Greg McGary
