A partial redefine needs to be treated like a tied operand, and the register
must be reloaded while processing use operands.
This fixes a bug where partially redefined registers were processed as normal
defs with a reload added. The reload could clobber another use operand if it was
a kill that allowed register reuse.
llvm-svn: 107193
The LowerSubregs pass needs to preserve implicit def operands attached to
EXTRACT_SUBREG instructions when it replaces those instructions with copies.
llvm-svn: 107189
of getPhysicalRegisterRegClass with it.
If we want to make a copy (or estimate its cost), it is better to use the
smallest class as more efficient operations might be possible.
llvm-svn: 107140
There are 2 changes relative to the previous version of the patch:
1) For the "simple" if-conversion case, there's no need to worry about
RemoveExtraEdges not handling an unanalyzable branch. Predicated terminators
are ignored in this context, so RemoveExtraEdges does the right thing.
This might break someday if we ever treat indirect branches (BRIND) as
predicable, but for now, I just removed this part of the patch, because
in the case where we do not add an unconditional branch, we rely on keeping
the fall-through edge to CvtBBI (which is empty after this transformation).
The change relative to the previous patch is:
@@ -1036,10 +1036,6 @@
IterIfcvt = false;
}
- // RemoveExtraEdges won't work if the block has an unanalyzable branch,
- // which is typically the case for IfConvertSimple, so explicitly remove
- // CvtBBI as a successor.
- BBI.BB->removeSuccessor(CvtBBI->BB);
RemoveExtraEdges(BBI);
// Update block info. BB can be iteratively if-converted.
2) My patch exposed a bug in the code for merging the tail of a "diamond",
which had previously never been exercised. The code was simply checking that
the tail had a single predecessor, but there was a case in
MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/dbms where that single predecessor was
neither edge of the diamond. I added the following change to check for
that:
@@ -1276,7 +1276,18 @@
// tail, add a unconditional branch to it.
if (TailBB) {
BBInfo TailBBI = BBAnalysis[TailBB->getNumber()];
- if (TailBB->pred_size() == 1 && !TailBBI.HasFallThrough) {
+ bool CanMergeTail = !TailBBI.HasFallThrough;
+ // There may still be a fall-through edge from BBI1 or BBI2 to TailBB;
+ // check if there are any other predecessors besides those.
+ unsigned NumPreds = TailBB->pred_size();
+ if (NumPreds > 1)
+ CanMergeTail = false;
+ else if (NumPreds == 1 && CanMergeTail) {
+ MachineBasicBlock::pred_iterator PI = TailBB->pred_begin();
+ if (*PI != BBI1->BB && *PI != BBI2->BB)
+ CanMergeTail = false;
+ }
+ if (CanMergeTail) {
MergeBlocks(BBI, TailBBI);
TailBBI.IsDone = true;
} else {
With these fixes, I was able to run all the SingleSource and MultiSource
tests successfully.
llvm-svn: 107110
have to be registers, per gcc documentation. This affects
the logic for determining what "g" should lower to. PR 7393.
A couple of existing testcases are affected.
llvm-svn: 107079
When an instruction has tied operands and physreg defines, we must take extra
care that the tied operands conflict with neither physreg defs nor uses.
The special treatment is given to inline asm and instructions with tied operands
/ early clobbers and physreg defines.
This fixes PR7509.
llvm-svn: 107043
if-conversion. The RemoveExtraEdges function doesn't work for blocks that
end with unanalyzable branches, so in those cases, the "extra" edges must
be explicitly removed. The CopyAndPredicateBlock and MergeBlocks methods
can also avoid copying successor edges due to branches that have already
been removed. The latter case is especially helpful when MergeBlocks is
called for handling "diamond" if-conversions, where otherwise you can end
up with some weird intermediate states in the CFG. Unfortunately I've
been unable to find cases where this cleanup actually makes a significant
difference in the code. There is one test where we manage to remove an
empty block at the end of a function. Radar 6911268.
llvm-svn: 106939
CopyFromReg nodes for aliasing registers (AX and AL). This confuses the fast
register allocator.
Instead of CopyFromReg(AL), use ExtractSubReg(CopyFromReg(AX), sub_8bit).
This fixes PR7312.
llvm-svn: 106934
introduced in r106343, but only showed up recently (with a particular compiler &
linker combination) because of the particular check, and because we have no
builtin checking for dereferencing the end of an array, which is truly
unfortunate.
llvm-svn: 106908
for an "i" constraint should get lowered; PR 6309. While
this argument was passed around a lot, this is the only
place it was used, so it goes away from a lot of other
places.
llvm-svn: 106893
address requires a register or secondary load to compute
(most PIC modes). This improves "g" constraint handling. 8015842.
The test from 2007 is attempting to test the fix for PR1761,
but since -relocation-model=static doesn't work on Darwin
x86-64, it was not testing what it was supposed to be testing
and was passing erroneously. Fixed to use Linux x86-64.
llvm-svn: 106779
CoalescerPair can determine if a copy can be coalesced, and which register gets
merged away. The old logic in SimpleRegisterCoalescing had evolved into
something a bit too convoluted.
This second attempt fixes some crashes that only occurred Linux.
llvm-svn: 106769
when the condition is constant. This optimization shouldn't be
necessary, because codegen shouldn't be able to find dead control
paths that the IR-level optimizer can't find. And it's undesirable,
because it encourages bugpoint to leave "br i1 false" branches
in its output. And it wasn't updating the CFG.
I updated all the tests I could, but some tests are too reduced
and I wasn't able to meaningfully preserve them.
llvm-svn: 106748
CoalescerPair can determine if a copy can be coalesced, and which register gets
merged away. The old logic in SimpleRegisterCoalescing had evolved into
something a bit too convoluted.
llvm-svn: 106701
void t(int *cp0, int *cp1, int *dp, int fmd) {
int c0, c1, d0, d1, d2, d3;
c0 = (*cp0++ & 0xffff) | ((*cp1++ << 16) & 0xffff0000);
c1 = (*cp0++ & 0xffff) | ((*cp1++ << 16) & 0xffff0000);
/* ... */
}
It code gens into something pretty bad. But with this change (analogous to the
X86 back-end), it will use ldm and generate few instructions.
llvm-svn: 106693
Measurements show that it does not speed up coalescing, so there is no reason
the keep the added complexity around.
Also clean out some unused methods and static functions.
llvm-svn: 106548
Dan Gohman