We currently use target_link_libraries without an explicit scope
specifier (INTERFACE, PRIVATE or PUBLIC) when linking executables.
Dependencies added in this way apply to both the target and its
dependencies, i.e. they become part of the executable's link interface
and are transitive.
Transitive dependencies generally don't make sense for executables,
since you wouldn't normally be linking against an executable. This also
causes issues for generating install export files when using
LLVM_DISTRIBUTION_COMPONENTS. For example, clang has a lot of LLVM
library dependencies, which are currently added as interface
dependencies. If clang is in the distribution components but the LLVM
libraries it depends on aren't (which is a perfectly legitimate use case
if the LLVM libraries are being built static and there are therefore no
run-time dependencies on them), CMake will complain about the LLVM
libraries not being in export set when attempting to generate the
install export file for clang. This is reasonable behavior on CMake's
part, and the right thing is for LLVM's build system to explicitly use
PRIVATE dependencies for executables.
Unfortunately, CMake doesn't allow you to mix and match the keyword and
non-keyword target_link_libraries signatures for a single target; i.e.,
if a single call to target_link_libraries for a particular target uses
one of the INTERFACE, PRIVATE, or PUBLIC keywords, all other calls must
also be updated to use those keywords. This means we must do this change
in a single shot. I also fully expect to have missed some instances; I
tested by enabling all the projects in the monorepo (except dragonegg),
and configuring both with and without shared libraries, on both Darwin
and Linux, but I'm planning to rely on the buildbots for other
configurations (since it should be pretty easy to fix those).
Even after this change, we still have a lot of target_link_libraries
calls that don't specify a scope keyword, mostly for shared libraries.
I'm thinking about addressing those in a follow-up, but that's a
separate change IMO.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40823
llvm-svn: 319840
This change migrates clang-format to add_clang_tool which makes a component-based install target. To support component-based installation the extra installed scripts all need to have the "clang-format" component too.
llvm-svn: 261680
To implement this nicely, add a function that merges two sets of
replacements that are meant to be done in sequence. This functionality
will also be useful for other applications, e.g. formatting the result
of clang-tidy fixes.
llvm-svn: 248367
Summary:
This adds clang-format-fuzzer binary,
which depends on the Fuzzer lib,
see http://reviews.llvm.org/D7184
This fuzer has found ~15 bugs so far, and I hope to set up a bot for it.
Test Plan: run on a bot.
Reviewers: samsonov, djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: curdeius, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7202
llvm-svn: 227354
This moves classes for storing and applying replacements to separate
files. These classes specifically are used by clang-format which doesn't
have any other dependencies on clangAST. Thereby, the size of
clang-format's binary can be cut roughly in half and its build time sped
up.
llvm-svn: 220867
The rewrite facility's footprint is small so it's not worth going to these
lengths to support disabling at configure time, particularly since key compiler
features now depend on it.
Meanwhile the Objective-C rewriters have been moved under the
ENABLE_CLANG_ARCMT umbrella for now as they're comparatively heavy and still
potentially worth excluding from lightweight builds.
Tests are now passing with any combination of feature flags. The flags
historically haven't been tested by LLVM's build servers so caveat emptor.
llvm-svn: 213171
Tom Stellard