Summary:
Since the SPE4RC register class contains an identical set of registers
and an identical spill size to the GPRC class its slightly confusing
the tablegen emitter. It's preventing the GPRC_and_GPRC_NOR0 synthesized
register class from inheriting VTs and AltOrders from GPRC or GPRC_NOR0.
This is because SPE4C is found first in the super register class list
when inheriting these properties and it doesn't set the VTs or
AltOrders the same way as GPRC or GPRC_NOR0.
This patch replaces all uses of GPE4RC with GPRC and allows GPRC and
GPRC_NOR0 to contain f32.
The test changes here are because the AltOrders are being inherited
to GPRC_NOR0 now.
Found while trying to determine if getCommonSubClass needs to take
a VT argument. It was originally added to support fp128 on x86-64,
I've changed some things about that so that it might be needed
anymore. But a PowerPC test crashed without it and I think its
due to this subclass issue.
Reviewers: jhibbits, nemanjai, kbarton, hfinkel
Subscribers: wuzish, nemanjai, mehdi_amini, hiraditya, kbarton, MaskRay, dexonsmith, jsji, shchenz, steven.zhang, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67513
llvm-svn: 371779
Summary:
This is the backend part of [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42457 | PR42457 ]].
In middle-end, we'd want to prefer the form with two adds - D63992,
but as this diff shows, not every target will prefer that pattern.
Out of 4 targets for which i added tests all seem to be ok with inc-of-add for scalars,
but only X86 prefer that same pattern for vectors.
Here i'm adding a new TLI hook, always defaulting to the inc-of-add,
but adding AArch64,ARM,PowerPC overrides to prefer inc-of-add only for scalars.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, efriedma, t.p.northover, hfinkel
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: nemanjai, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, kbarton, jsji, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64090
llvm-svn: 365010
I initially committed it with --check-prefix instead of --check-prefixes
(again, shame on me, and utils/update_*.py not complaining!)
and did not have a moment to understand the failure,
so i reverted it initially in rL64939.
llvm-svn: 364945
As it is pointed out in https://reviews.llvm.org/D63992,
before we get to pick canonical variant in middle-end
we should ensure best codegen in backend.
llvm-svn: 364930
Craig Topper