A discriminator is used for the first occurrence of a name.
inline int f1 () {
static union {
int a;
long int b;
};
static union {
int c;
double d;
};
return a+c;
}
The name of the second union is mangled as _ZZ2f1vE1c_0 instead of _ZZ2f1vE1c.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6295
llvm-svn: 224131
This is a new form of expression of the form:
(expr op ... op expr)
where one of the exprs is a parameter pack. It expands into
(expr1 op (expr2onwards op ... op expr))
(and likewise if the pack is on the right). The non-pack operand can be
omitted; in that case, an empty pack gives a fallback value or an error,
depending on the operator.
llvm-svn: 221573
Template template parameters weren't added to the list of substitutions.
This would make the substitution map contain inaccurate mappings,
leading to Clang violating the Itanium ABI and breaking compatibility
with GCC.
This fixes PR21351.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5959
llvm-svn: 220588
Plumb through the full QualType of the TemplateArgument::Declaration, as
it's insufficient to only know whether the type is a reference or
pointer (that was necessary for mangling, but insufficient for debug
info). This shouldn't increase the size of TemplateArgument as
TemplateArgument::Integer is still longer by another 32 bits.
Several bits of code were testing that the reference-ness of the
parameters matched, but this seemed to be insufficient (various other
features of the type could've mismatched and wouldn't've been caught)
and unnecessary, at least insofar as removing those tests didn't cause
anything to fail.
(Richard - perchaps you can hypothesize why any of these checks might
need to test reference-ness of the parameters (& explain why
reference-ness is part of the mangling - I would've figured that for the
reference-ness to be different, a prior template argument would have to
be different). I'd be happy to add them in/beef them up and add test
cases if there's a reason for them)
llvm-svn: 219900
We build a NestedNameSpecifier that records the CXXRecordDecl in which
__super appeared. Name lookup is performed in all base classes of the
recorded CXXRecordDecl. Use of __super is allowed only inside class and
member function scope.
llvm-svn: 218484
Don't mangle all casts in expressions as "cv", use the appropriate
encoding which corresponds to a specific cast.
This fixes PR21034.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5453
llvm-svn: 218293
There are situations when clang knows that the C1 and C2 constructors
or the D1 and D2 destructors are identical. We already optimize some
of these cases, but cannot optimize it when the GlobalValue is
weak_odr.
The problem with weak_odr is that an old TU seeing the same code will
have a C1 and a C2 comdat with the corresponding symbols. We cannot
suddenly start putting the C2 symbol in the C1 comdat as we cannot
guarantee that the linker will not pick a .o with only C1 in it.
The solution implemented by GCC is to expand the ABI to have a comdat
whose name uses a C5/D5 suffix and always has both symbols. That is
what this patch implements.
llvm-svn: 217874
CXXNameMangler::mangleUnqualifiedBlock believed that
MangleContext::getBlockId returned something that used Itanium-style
discriminator numbers.
Discriminator numbers start their numberign from 1 and the first
mangling that actually gets any sort of number mangled in is the second
discriminator.
However, Block IDs start from zero. The logic for omitting the mangling
number did a ' > 1' instead of a ' > 0' comparison; this could
potentially cause mangling conflicts.
llvm-svn: 214699
The main subtlety here is that the Darwin tools still need to be given "-arch
arm64" rather than "-arch aarch64". Fortunately this already goes via a custom
function to handle weird edge-cases in other architectures, and it tested.
I removed a few arm64_be tests because that really isn't an interesting thing
to worry about. No-one using big-endian is also referring to the target as
arm64 (at least as far as toolchains go). Mostly they date from when arm64 was
a separate target and we *did* need a parallel name simply to test it at all.
Now aarch64_be is sufficient.
llvm-svn: 213744
A few (mostly CodeGen) parts of Clang were tightly coupled to the
AArch64 backend. Now that it's gone, they will not even compile.
I've also deduplicated RUN lines in many of the AArch64 tests. This
might improve "make check-all" time noticably: some of those NEON
tests were monsters.
llvm-svn: 209578
Summary:
Update our mangling to match the discussion on cxx-abi-dev.
This involves using a seq-id instead of an optional number.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3631
llvm-svn: 208140
Summary:
Previously, we would generate a single name for all reference
temporaries and allow LLVM to rename them for us. Instead, number the
reference temporaries as we build them in Sema.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3554
llvm-svn: 207776
cxx-abi-dev came up with a way to disambiguate between different
keywords used in elaborated type specifiers.
This resolves certain collisions during mangling.
llvm-svn: 205943
This adds Clang support for the ARM64 backend. There are definitely
still some rough edges, so please bring up any issues you see with
this patch.
As with the LLVM commit though, we think it'll be more useful for
merging with AArch64 from within the tree.
llvm-svn: 205100
COFF doesn't have mergeable sections so LLVM/clang's normal tactics for
string deduplication will not have any effect.
To remedy this we place each string inside it's own section and mark
the section as IMAGE_COMDAT_SELECT_ANY. However, we can only do this if the
string has an external name that we can generate from it's contents.
To be compatible with MSVC, we must use their scheme. Otherwise identical
strings in translation units from clang may not be deduplicated with
translation units in MSVC.
This fixes PR18248.
N.B. We will not attempt to do anything with a string literal which is not of
type 'char' or 'wchar_t' because their compiler does not support unicode
string literals as of this date. Further, we avoid doing this if
either -fwritable-strings or -fsanitize=address are present.
This reverts commit r204596.
llvm-svn: 204675
COFF doesn't have mergeable sections so LLVM/clang's normal tactics for
string deduplication will not have any effect.
To remedy this we place each string inside it's own section and mark
the section as IMAGE_COMDAT_SELECT_ANY. However, we can only do this if the
string has an external name that we can generate from it's contents.
To be compatible with MSVC, we must use their scheme. Otherwise identical
strings in translation units from clang may not be deduplicated with
translation units in MSVC.
This fixes PR18248.
N.B. We will not attempt to do anything with a string literal which is not of
type 'char' or 'wchar_t' because their compiler does not support unicode
string literals as of this date.
llvm-svn: 204562
Summary:
The MSVC ABI appears to mangle the lexical scope into the names of
statics. Specifically, a counter is incremented whenever a scope is
entered where things can be declared in such a way that an ambiguity can
arise. For example, a class scope inside of a class scope doesn't do
anything interesting because the nested class cannot collide with
another nested class.
There are problems with this scheme:
- It is unreliable. The counter is only incremented when a previously
never encountered scope is entered. There are cases where this will
cause ambiguity amongst declarations that have the same name where one
was introduced in a deep scope while the other was introduced right
after in the previous lexical scope.
- It is wasteful. Statements like: {{{{{{{ static int foo = a; }}}}}}}
will make the mangling of "foo" larger than it need be because the
scope counter has been incremented many times.
Because of these problems, and practical implementation concerns. We
choose not to implement this scheme if the local static or local type
isn't visible. The mangling of these declarations will look very
similar but the numbering will make far more sense, this scheme is
lifted from the Itanium ABI implementation.
Reviewers: rsmith, doug.gregor, rnk, eli.friedman, cdavis5x
Reviewed By: rnk
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2953
llvm-svn: 202951
Most 64-bit targets define int64_t as long int, and AArch64 should
make same definition to follow LP64 model. In GNU tool chain, int64_t
is defined as long int for 64-bit target. So to get consistent with GNU,
it's better Changing int64_t from 'long long int' to 'long int',
otherwise clang will get different name mangling suffix compared with g++.
llvm-svn: 202004
A return type is the declared or deduced part of the function type specified in
the declaration.
A result type is the (potentially adjusted) type of the value of an expression
that calls the function.
Rule of thumb:
* Declarations have return types and parameters.
* Expressions have result types and arguments.
llvm-svn: 200082
Fix a perennial source of confusion in the clang type system: Declarations and
function prototypes have parameters to which arguments are supplied, so calling
these 'arguments' was a stretch even in C mode, let alone C++ where default
arguments, templates and overloading make the distinction important to get
right.
Readability win across the board, especially in the casting, ADL and
overloading implementations which make a lot more sense at a glance now.
Will keep an eye on the builders and update dependent projects shortly.
No functional change.
llvm-svn: 199686
Remove UnaryTypeTraitExpr and switch all remaining type trait related handling
over to TypeTraitExpr.
The UTT/BTT/TT enum prefix and evaluation code is retained pending further
cleanup.
This is part of the ongoing work to unify type traits following the removal of
BinaryTypeTraitExpr in r197273.
llvm-svn: 198271
There's nothing special about type traits accepting two arguments.
This commit eliminates BinaryTypeTraitExpr and switches all related handling
over to TypeTraitExpr.
Also fixes a CodeGen failure with variadic type traits appearing in a
non-constant expression.
The BTT/TT prefix and evaluation code is retained as-is for now but will soon
be further cleaned up.
This is part of the ongoing work to unify type traits.
llvm-svn: 197273
The old URL hasn't worked for quite some time. While we are here, also
change the link so that it will send us straight to the mangling portion
of the ABI doc.
llvm-svn: 197195
Summary:
In general, this type node can be used to represent any type adjustment
that occurs implicitly without losing type sugar. The immediate use of
this is to adjust the calling conventions of member function pointer
types without breaking template instantiation.
Fixes PR17996.
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2332
llvm-svn: 196451
Summary:
RTTI is not yet implemented for the Microsoft C++ ABI and isn't expected
soon. We could easily add the mangling, but the error is what prevents
us from silently miscompiling code that expects RTTI.
Instead, add a new mangleTypeName entry point that simply forwards to
mangleName or mangleType to produce a string that isn't part of the ABI.
Itanium can continue to use RTTI names to avoid unecessary test
breakage.
This also seems like the right design. The fact that TBAA names happen
to be RTTI names is now an implementation detail of the mangler, rather
than part of TBAA.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2153
llvm-svn: 195168
Evgeny Astigeevich