union subobject initialization before checking whether the next
initiailizer was actually a designated initializer. This led to
spurious "excess elements in union initializer" errors. Thanks to
rdivacky for reporting the bug!
llvm-svn: 64392
tried to put FIXMEs on the most important things to fix up. Lots left
to do including more codegen, more documentation and cleaning code and
style cleanups.
llvm-svn: 64390
- rename isObjCIdType/isObjCClassType -> isObjCIdStructType/isObjCClassStructType. The previous name didn't do what you would expect.
- add back isObjCIdType/isObjCClassType to do what you would expect. Not currently used, however many of the isObjCIdStructType/isObjCClassStructType clients could be converted over time.
- move static Sema function areComparableObjCInterfaces to ASTContext (renamed to areComparableObjCPointerTypes, since it now operates on pointer types).
llvm-svn: 64385
to use this stat information in the PTH file using a 'StatSysCallCache' object.
Performance impact (Cocoa.h, PTH):
- number of stat calls reduces from 1230 to 425
- fsyntax-only: time improves by 4.2%
We can reduce the number of stat calls to almost zero by caching negative stat
calls and directory stat calls in the PTH file as well.
llvm-svn: 64353
- set the 'StatSysCallCache' object using a setter method instead of
FileManager's constructor. This allows the cache to be installed after the
FileManager object is created.
- Add 'file mode' to FileEntry (useful for stat caching)
llvm-svn: 64351
for use by FileManager. FileManager now takes a StatSysCallCache* in its
constructor (which defaults to NULL). This will be used for evaluating whether
or not caching 'stat' system calls in PTH is a performance win. This shim adds
no observable performance impact in the case where the 'StatSysCallCache*' is
null.
llvm-svn: 64345
complex conversions where the conversion between the real types is an
integral promotion. This is how G++ handles complex promotions for its
complex integer extension.
llvm-svn: 64344
system. Since C99 doesn't have overloading and C++ doesn't have
_Complex, there is no specification for this. Here's what I think
makes sense.
Complex conversions come in several flavors:
- Complex promotions: a complex -> complex conversion where the
underlying real-type conversion is a floating-point promotion. GCC
seems to call this a promotion, EDG does something else. This is
given "promotion" rank for determining the best viable function.
- Complex conversions: a complex -> complex conversion that is
not a complex promotion. This is given "conversion" rank for
determining the best viable function.
- Complex-real conversions: a real -> complex or complex -> real
conversion. This is given "conversion" rank for determining the
best viable function.
These rules are the same for C99 (when using the "overloadable"
attribute) and C++. However, there is one difference in the handling
of floating-point promotions: in C99, float -> long double and double
-> long double are considered promotions (so we give them "promotion"
rank), while C++ considers these conversions ("conversion" rank).
llvm-svn: 64343
Douglas Gregor