This lowers frem to a runtime libcall inside fast-isel.
The test case also checks the CallLoweringInfo bug that was exposed by this
change.
This fixes rdar://problem/18342783.
llvm-svn: 217833
using static relocation model and small code model.
Summary: currently we generate GOT based relocations for weak symbol
references regardless of the underlying relocation model. This should
be change so that in static relocation model we use a constant pool
load instead.
Patch from: Keith Walker
Reviewers: Renato Golin, Tim Northover
llvm-svn: 217503
This is the final round of renaming. This changes tblgen to emit lower-case
function names for FastEmitInst_* and FastEmit_*, and updates all its uses
in the source code.
Reviewed by Eric
llvm-svn: 217075
Things got a little bit messy over the years and it is time for a little bit
spring cleaning.
This first commit is focused on the FastISel base class itself. It doxyfies all
comments, C++11fies the code where it makes sense, renames internal methods to
adhere to the coding standard, and clang-formats the files.
Reviewed by Eric
llvm-svn: 217060
There is already target-dependent instruction selection support for Adds/Subs to
support compares and the intrinsics with overflow check. This takes advantage of
the existing infrastructure to also support Add/Sub, which allows the folding of
immediates, sign-/zero-extends, and shifts.
This fixes rdar://problem/18207316.
llvm-svn: 217007
This uses the target-dependent selection code for shifts first, which allows us
to create better code for shifts with immediates and sign-/zero-extend folding.
Vector type are not handled yet and the code falls back to target-independent
instruction selection for these cases.
This fixes rdar://problem/17907920.
llvm-svn: 216985
FastISel for AArch64 supports more value types than are actually legal. Use a
dedicated helper function to reflect this.
It is very similar to the isLoadStoreTypeLegal function, with the exception
that vector types are not supported yet.
llvm-svn: 216984
This change moves FastISel for AArch64 to target-dependent instruction selection
only. This change replicates the existing target-independent behavior, therefore
there are no changes to the unit tests or new tests.
Future changes will take advantage of this change and update functionality
and unit tests.
llvm-svn: 216955
When we select a trunc instruction we don't emit any code if the type is already
i32 or smaller. This is because the instruction that uses the truncated value
will deal with it.
This behavior can incorrectly transfer a kill flag, which was meant for the
result of the truncate, onto the source register.
%2 = trunc i32 %1 to i16
... = ... %2 -> ... = ... vreg1 <kill>
... = ... %1 ... = ... vreg1
This commit fixes this by emitting a COPY instruction, so that the result and
source register are distinct virtual registers.
This fixes rdar://problem/18178188.
llvm-svn: 216750
This fix checks first if the instruction to be folded (e.g. sign-/zero-extend,
or shift) is in the same machine basic block as the instruction we are folding
into.
Not doing so can result in incorrect code, because the value might not be
live-out of the basic block, where the value is defined.
This fixes rdar://problem/18169495.
llvm-svn: 216700
Currently instructions are folded very aggressively into the memory operation,
which can lead to the use of killed operands:
%vreg1<def> = ADDXri %vreg0<kill>, 2
%vreg2<def> = LDRBBui %vreg0, 2
... = ... %vreg1 ...
This usually happens when the result is also used by another non-memory
instruction in the same basic block, or any instruction in another basic block.
If the computed address is used by only memory operations in the same basic
block, then it is safe to fold them. This is because all memory operations will
fold the address computation and the original computation will never be emitted.
This fixes rdar://problem/18142857.
llvm-svn: 216629
When the address comes directly from a shift instruction then the address
computation cannot be folded into the memory instruction, because the zero
register is not available as a base register. Simplify addess needs to emit the
shift instruction and use the result as base register.
llvm-svn: 216621
Use the zero register directly when possible to avoid an unnecessary register
copy and a wasted register at -O0. This also uses integer stores to store a
positive floating-point zero. This saves us from materializing the positive zero
in a register and then storing it.
llvm-svn: 216617
When a shift with extension or an add with shift and extension cannot be folded
into the memory operation, then the address calculation has to be materialized
separately. While doing so the code forgot to consider a possible sign-/zero-
extension. This fix folds now also the sign-/zero-extension into the add or
shift instruction which is used to materialize the address.
This fixes rdar://problem/18141718.
llvm-svn: 216511
This is mostly achieved by providing the correct register class manually,
because getRegClassFor always returns the GPR*AllRegClass for MVT::i32 and
MVT::i64.
Also cleanup the code to use the FastEmitInst_* method whenever possible. This
makes sure that the operands' register class is properly constrained. For all
the remaining cases this adds the missing constrainOperandRegClass calls for
each operand.
llvm-svn: 216225
This fixes a bug I introduced in a previous commit (r216033). Sign-/Zero-
extension from i1 cannot be folded into the ADDS/SUBS instructions. Instead both
operands have to be sign-/zero-extended with separate instructions.
Related to <rdar://problem/17913111>.
llvm-svn: 216073
Use FMOVWSr/FMOVXDr instead of FMOVSr/FMOVDr, which have the proper register
class to be used with the zero register. This makes the MachineInstruction
verifier happy again.
This is related to <rdar://problem/18027157>.
llvm-svn: 216040
Factor out the ADDS/SUBS instruction emission code into helper functions and
make the helper functions more clever to support most of the different ADDS/SUBS
instructions the architecture support. This includes better immedediate support,
shift folding, and sign-/zero-extend folding.
This fixes <rdar://problem/17913111>.
llvm-svn: 216033
Note: This was originally reverted to track down a buildbot error. Reapply
without any modifications.
Original commit message:
FastISel didn't take much advantage of the different addressing modes available
to it on AArch64. This commit allows the ComputeAddress method to recognize more
addressing modes that allows shifts and sign-/zero-extensions to be folded into
the memory operation itself.
For Example:
lsl x1, x1, #3 --> ldr x0, [x0, x1, lsl #3]
ldr x0, [x0, x1]
sxtw x1, w1
lsl x1, x1, #3 --> ldr x0, [x0, x1, sxtw #3]
ldr x0, [x0, x1]
llvm-svn: 216013
Note: This was originally reverted to track down a buildbot error. Reapply
without any modifications.
Original commit message:
This change materializes now the value "0" from the zero register.
The zero register can be folded by several instruction, so no
materialization is need at all.
Fixes <rdar://problem/17924413>.
llvm-svn: 216009
This fixes a few BuildMI callsites where the result register was added by
using addReg, which is per default a use and therefore an operand register.
Also use the zero register as result register when emitting a compare
instruction (SUBS with unused result register).
llvm-svn: 215997
The floating-point value positive zero (+0.0) is a valid immedate value
according to isFPImmLegal. As a result AArch64 FastISel went ahead and
used the immediate version of fmov to materialize the constant.
The problem is that the immediate version of fmov cannot encode an imediate for
postive zero. Instead a fmov from the zero register was supposed to be used in
this case.
This fix adds handling for this special case and uses fmov from the zero
register to materialize a positive zero (negative zeroes go to the constant
pool).
There is no test case for this, because this code is currently dead. It will be
enabled in a future commit and I will add a test case in a separate commit
after that.
This fixes <rdar://problem/18027157>.
llvm-svn: 215753
Note: This reapplies r215582 without any modifications. The refactoring wasn't
responsible for the buildbot failures.
Original commit message:
Cleanup and prepare constant materialization code for future commits.
llvm-svn: 215752
This reverts:
r215595 "[FastISel][X86] Add large code model support for materializing floating-point constants."
r215594 "[FastISel][X86] Use XOR to materialize the "0" value."
r215593 "[FastISel][X86] Emit more efficient instructions for integer constant materialization."
r215591 "[FastISel][AArch64] Make use of the zero register when possible."
r215588 "[FastISel] Let the target decide first if it wants to materialize a constant."
r215582 "[FastISel][AArch64] Cleanup constant materialization code. NFCI."
llvm-svn: 215673
Certain functions such as objc_autoreleaseReturnValue have to be called as
tail-calls even at -O0. Since normal fast-isel doesn't emit calls as tail calls,
we have to fall back to SelectionDAG to select calls that are marked as tail.
<rdar://problem/17991614>
llvm-svn: 215600
FastISel didn't take much advantage of the different addressing modes available
to it on AArch64. This commit allows the ComputeAddress method to recognize more
addressing modes that allows shifts and sign-/zero-extensions to be folded into
the memory operation itself.
For Example:
lsl x1, x1, #3 --> ldr x0, [x0, x1, lsl #3]
ldr x0, [x0, x1]
sxtw x1, w1
lsl x1, x1, #3 --> ldr x0, [x0, x1, sxtw #3]
ldr x0, [x0, x1]
llvm-svn: 215597
This change materializes now the value "0" from the zero register.
The zero register can be folded by several instruction, so no
materialization is need at all.
Fixes <rdar://problem/17924413>.
llvm-svn: 215591
Juergen Ributzka