Before this patch we were parsing the attributes as section offsets, as
that is what apple_names is doing. However, this is not correct as DWARF
v5 specifies that this attribute should use the Reference form class.
This also updates all the testcases (except the ones that deliberately
pass a different form) to use the correct form class.
llvm-svn: 328773
Fixes for "lets" references which should be "let's" in the Kaleidoscope
tutorial.
Patch by: Robin Dupret
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44990
llvm-svn: 328772
We are re-adding all the bitcasts, constant masks and target shuffles to the work list for no apparent gain.
Found while investigating adding SimplifyDemandedVectorElts to target shuffles.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44942
llvm-svn: 328771
These functions were unused as everyone just went straight for the
direct operations on the register context. In fact, the
Save/RestoreAllRegisters actually appear to be wrong (inverted). Thanks
to Tatyana for pointing this out.
These functions are not very useful now that we can guarantee that each
thread always contains a valid register context, so I just delete them.
llvm-svn: 328770
Summary:
As we are only doing X.0.Z releases (not using the minor version), there is no need to keep -X.Y in the version.
So, instead, I propose the following:
Instead of having clang-7.0 in bin/, we will have clang-7
Since also matches was gcc is doing.
Reviewers: tstellar, dlj, dim, hans
Reviewed By: dim, hans
Subscribers: dim, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41808
llvm-svn: 328769
Summary:
As we are only doing X.0.Z releases (not using the minor version), there is no need to keep -X.Y in the version.
Like patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D41808, I propose that we rename libLLVM-7.0svn.so to libLLVM-7svn.so
This patch will also rename downstream libraries like liblldb-7.0 to liblldb-7
Reviewers: axw, beanz, dim, hans
Reviewed By: dim, hans
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41869
llvm-svn: 328768
I believe the role of ehDataReg has been replaced by MipsABIInfo::GetEhDataReg, thus removing the dead code.
Patch By: Wei-Ren Chen.
Reviewers: ehostunreach, sdardis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44867
llvm-svn: 328767
The existing LoopRotation.cpp is implemented as one of loop passes instead of
being a utility. The user cannot easily perform the loop rotation selectively
(or on demand) under different optimization level. For example, the loop
rotation is needed as part of the logic to convert a loop into a loop with
bottom test for a transformation. If the loop rotation is simply added as a
loop pass before the transformation, the pass is skipped if it is compiled at
–O0 or if it is explicitly disabled by the user, causing the compiler to
generate incorrect code. Furthermore, as a loop pass it will rotate all loops
instead of just the relevant loops.
We provide a utility interface for the loop rotation so that the loop rotation
can be called on demand. The changeset is as follows:
- Create a new file lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopRotationUtils.cpp and move the main
implementation of class LoopRotate into this file.
- Create a new file llvm/include/Transform/Utils/LoopRotationUtils.h with the
interface LoopRotation(...).
- Original LoopRotation.cpp is changed to use the utility function LoopRotation
in LoopRotationUtils.cpp. This is done in the same way community did for
mem-to-reg implementation.
Patch by Jin Lin!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44595
llvm-svn: 328766
Otherwise the definitions can't see the extern C declarations and get
name mangled, making it impossible for users to call them. This breaks
the Go bindings.
llvm-svn: 328765
Use range-based for-loops instead of iterators to walk over vectors.
Switch the key of the DenseMap so a custom key handler is no longer needed.
Remove unncessary adds to the DenseMap.
Use unique_ptr instead of manual memory management.
llvm-svn: 328763
The IntelPrinter and the ATTPrinter produce the same strings for the same input. We already use the ATTPrinter explicitly in several other places.
llvm-svn: 328762
Summary:
When a MIG routine returns KERN_FAILURE, the demux function will release any OOL resources like ports. In this case, task_port and thread_port will be released twice, potentially resulting in use after free of the ports.
I don't think we can test this in any useful way
rdar://problem/37331387
Reviewers: jasonmolenda
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45011
llvm-svn: 328761
Summary:
Add support for cleanupret, catchret, catchpad, cleanuppad and catchswitch and their associated accessors.
Test is modified from SimplifyCFG because it contains many diverse usages of these instructions.
Reviewers: whitequark, deadalnix, echristo
Reviewed By: echristo
Subscribers: llvm-commits, harlanhaskins
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44496
llvm-svn: 328759
Libc++ implements the pair& operator=(pair<U, V>) assignment operator
using a single template that handles assignment from all tuple-like types.
This patch moves the test for that to the libcxx test directory since
it's non-standard. It also adds additional tests to the std/.../pair
directory to test the standard behavior this template implements.
llvm-svn: 328758
Eli pointed out that variadic functions are totally a thing, so this
assert is incorrect.
No test-case is provided, since the only way this assert fires is if a
specific DenseMap falls back to doing `isEqual` checks, and that seems
fairly brittle (and requires a pyramid of growing
`call void (i8, ...) @varargs(i8 0)`).
llvm-svn: 328755
This patch corrects num_get for unsigned types to support strings
with a leading `-` character. According to the standard the
number should be parsed as an unsigned integer and then
negated.
llvm-svn: 328751
The AST for the fragment
```
@interface I
@end
template <typename>
void decode(I *p) {
for (I *k in p) {}
}
void decode(I *p) {
decode<int>(p);
}
```
differs heavily when templatized and non-templatized:
```
|-FunctionTemplateDecl 0x7fbfe0863940 <line:4:1, line:7:1> line:5:6 decode
| |-TemplateTypeParmDecl 0x7fbfe0863690 <line:4:11> col:11 typename depth 0 index 0
| |-FunctionDecl 0x7fbfe08638a0 <line:5:1, line:7:1> line:5:6 decode 'void (I *__strong)'
| | |-ParmVarDecl 0x7fbfe08637a0 <col:13, col:16> col:16 referenced p 'I *__strong'
| | `-CompoundStmt 0x7fbfe0863b88 <col:19, line:7:1>
| | `-ObjCForCollectionStmt 0x7fbfe0863b50 <line:6:3, col:20>
| | |-DeclStmt 0x7fbfe0863a50 <col:8, col:13>
| | | `-VarDecl 0x7fbfe08639f0 <col:8, col:11> col:11 k 'I *const __strong'
| | |-ImplicitCastExpr 0x7fbfe0863a90 <col:16> 'I *' <LValueToRValue>
| | | `-DeclRefExpr 0x7fbfe0863a68 <col:16> 'I *__strong' lvalue ParmVar 0x7fbfe08637a0 'p' 'I *__strong'
| | `-CompoundStmt 0x7fbfe0863b78 <col:19, col:20>
| `-FunctionDecl 0x7fbfe0863f80 <line:5:1, line:7:1> line:5:6 used decode 'void (I *__strong)'
| |-TemplateArgument type 'int'
| |-ParmVarDecl 0x7fbfe0863ef8 <col:13, col:16> col:16 used p 'I *__strong'
| `-CompoundStmt 0x7fbfe0890cf0 <col:19, line:7:1>
| `-ObjCForCollectionStmt 0x7fbfe0890cc8 <line:6:3, col:20>
| |-DeclStmt 0x7fbfe0890c70 <col:8, col:13>
| | `-VarDecl 0x7fbfe0890c00 <col:8, col:11> col:11 k 'I *__strong' callinit
| | `-ImplicitValueInitExpr 0x7fbfe0890c60 <<invalid sloc>> 'I *__strong'
| |-ImplicitCastExpr 0x7fbfe0890cb0 <col:16> 'I *' <LValueToRValue>
| | `-DeclRefExpr 0x7fbfe0890c88 <col:16> 'I *__strong' lvalue ParmVar 0x7fbfe0863ef8 'p' 'I *__strong'
| `-CompoundStmt 0x7fbfe0863b78 <col:19, col:20>
```
Note how in the instantiated version ImplicitValueInitExpr unexpectedly appears.
While objects are auto-initialized under ARC, it does not make sense to
have an initializer for a for-loop variable, and it makes even less
sense to have such a different AST for instantiated and non-instantiated
version.
Digging deeper, I have found that there are two separate Sema* files for
dealing with templates and for dealing with non-templatized code.
In a non-templatized version, an initialization was performed only for
variables which are not loop variables for an Objective-C loop and not
variables for a C++ for-in loop:
```
if (FRI && (Tok.is(tok::colon) || isTokIdentifier_in())) {
bool IsForRangeLoop = false;
if (TryConsumeToken(tok::colon, FRI->ColonLoc)) {
IsForRangeLoop = true;
if (Tok.is(tok::l_brace))
FRI->RangeExpr = ParseBraceInitializer();
else
FRI->RangeExpr = ParseExpression();
}
Decl *ThisDecl = Actions.ActOnDeclarator(getCurScope(), D);
if (IsForRangeLoop)
Actions.ActOnCXXForRangeDecl(ThisDecl);
Actions.FinalizeDeclaration(ThisDecl);
D.complete(ThisDecl);
return Actions.FinalizeDeclaratorGroup(getCurScope(), DS, ThisDecl);
}
SmallVector<Decl *, 8> DeclsInGroup;
Decl *FirstDecl = ParseDeclarationAfterDeclaratorAndAttributes(
D, ParsedTemplateInfo(), FRI);
```
However the code in SemaTemplateInstantiateDecl was inconsistent,
guarding only against C++ for-in loops.
rdar://38391075
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44989
llvm-svn: 328749
We use a `DenseMap<MemoryLocOrCall, MemlocStackInfo>` to keep track of
prior work when optimizing uses in MemorySSA. Because we weren't
accounting for callsite arguments in either the hash code or equality
tests for `MemoryLocOrCall`s, we optimized uses too aggressively in
some rare cases.
Fix by Daniel Berlin.
Should fix PR36883.
llvm-svn: 328748
Support includes this header for the typedefs - but logically it's part
of the MC/Disassembler library that implements the functions. Split the
header so as not to create a circular dependency.
This is another case where probably inverting the llvm-c implementation
might be best (rather than core llvm libraries implementing the parts of
llvm-c - instead llvm-c could be its own library, depending on all the
parts of LLVM's core libraries to then implement llvm-c on top of
them... if that makes sense)
llvm-svn: 328744
This check "CHECK: {{#0 0x.* in .*aligned_alloc}}" fails on ppc64be, gcc
build. Disabling the test for gcc for now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44404
llvm-svn: 328741
NonLocal is technically more accurate, but we already use the term
"Global" to specify the non-local part of the symbol table, and
Local <-> Global is easier to digest.
llvm-svn: 328740
This fixes pr36623.
The problem is that we have to parse versions out of names before LTO
so that LTO can use that information.
When we get the LTO produced .o files, we replace the previous symbols
with the LTO produced ones, but they still have @ in their names.
We could just trim the name directly, but calling parseSymbolVersion
to do it is simpler.
llvm-svn: 328738
Also make certain Thunk methods non-const as this will be required for
an upcoming change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44961
llvm-svn: 328732
ObjC and ObjC++ pass non-trivial structs in a way that is incompatible
with each other. For example:
typedef struct {
id f0;
__weak id f1;
} S;
// this code is compiled in c++.
extern "C" {
void foo(S s);
}
void caller() {
// the caller passes the parameter indirectly and destructs it.
foo(S());
}
// this function is compiled in c.
// 'a' is passed directly and is destructed in the callee.
void foo(S a) {
}
This patch fixes the incompatibility by passing and returning structs
with __strong or weak fields using the C ABI in C++ mode. __strong and
__weak fields in a struct do not cause the struct to be destructed in
the caller and __strong fields do not cause the struct to be passed
indirectly.
Also, this patch fixes the microsoft ABI bug mentioned here:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D41039?id=128767#inline-364710
rdar://problem/38887866
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44908
llvm-svn: 328731
Most of these were optional matches at the end of the strings, but since the strings themselves are prefix matches by default you don't need to check for something optional at the end.
I've left the 'b' on memory instructions where it means 'broadcast' because I'm not sure those really have the same load latency and we may need to split them explicitly in the future.
llvm-svn: 328730
Summary: Mark CFG is preserved since this pass do not make any change in CFG.
Reviewers: sebpop, mzolotukhin, mcrosier
Reviewed By: mzolotukhin
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44845
llvm-svn: 328727
These instructions have been around for a long time, but we
haven't supported intrinsics for them. The "new" vesrions use
the CSx register for the start of the buffer instead of the K
field in the Mx register.
There is a related llvm patch.
Patch by Brendon Cahoon.
llvm-svn: 328725
These instructions have been around for a long time, but we
haven't supported intrinsics for them. The "new" versions use
the CSx register for the start of the buffer instead of the K
field in the Mx register.
We need to use pseudo instructions for these instructions until
after register allocation. The problem is that these instructions
allocate a M0/CS0 or M1/CS1 pair. But, we can't generate code for
the CSx set-up until after register allocation when the Mx
register has been fixed for the instruction.
There is a related clang patch.
Patch by Brendon Cahoon.
llvm-svn: 328724
We were assuming that vbtable indices were assigned in layout order in
our comparison, which is not the case. When a virtual method, such as
the destructor, appears in multiple vftables, the vftable that appears
first in object layout order is the one that points to the main
implementation of that method. The later vftables use thunks.
In this layout, we adjusted "this" in the main implementation by the
amount that is appropriate for 'B' instead of 'A', even though the main
implementation is found in D's vftable for A:
struct A {
virtual ~A() {}
};
struct B {
virtual ~B() {}
};
struct C : virtual B {};
struct D : virtual A, C {};
D's layout looks like:
0 D subobject (empty)
0 C base suboject
8 A base subobject
16 B base subobject
With this fix, we correctly adjust by -8 in D's deleting destructor
instead of -16.
Fixes PR36921.
llvm-svn: 328723
Pavel Labath