Previously, the DAGISel function WalkChainUsers was spotting that it
had entered already-selected territory by whether a node was a
MachineNode (amongst other things). Since it's fairly common practice
to insert MachineNodes during ISelLowering, this was not the correct
check.
Looking around, it seems that other nodes get their NodeId set to -1
upon selection, so this makes sure the same thing happens to all
MachineNodes and uses that characteristic to determine whether we
should stop looking for a loop during selection.
This should fix PR15840.
llvm-svn: 191165
When selecting the DAG (add (WrapperRIP ...), (FrameIndex ...)), X86 code had
spotted the FrameIndex possibility and was working out whether it could fold
the WrapperRIP into this.
The test for forming a %rip version is notionally whether we already have a
base or index register (%rip precludes both), but we were forgetting to account
for the register that would be inserted later to access the frame.
rdar://problem/15024520
llvm-svn: 190995
Previously LEA64_32r went through virtually the entire backend thinking it was
using 32-bit registers until its blissful illusions were cruelly snatched away
by MCInstLower and 64-bit equivalents were substituted at the last minute.
This patch makes it behave normally, and take 64-bit registers as sources all
the way through. Previous uses (for 32-bit arithmetic) are accommodated via
SUBREG_TO_REG instructions which make the types and classes agree properly.
llvm-svn: 183693
Add earlyclobber constaints to prevent input register being allocated as
the output register because, according to Intel spec [1], "If any pair
of the index, mask, or destination registers are the same, this
instruction results a UD fault."
---
[1] http://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/319433-014.pdf
llvm-svn: 183327
The MOV64ri64i32 instruction required hacky MCInst lowering because it
was allocated as setting a GR64, but the eventual instruction ("movl")
only set a GR32. This converts it into a so-called "MOV32ri64" which
still accepts a (appropriate) 64-bit immediate but defines a GR32.
This is then converted to the full GR64 by a SUBREG_TO_REG operation,
thus keeping everyone happy.
This fixes a typo in the opcode field of the original patch, which
should make the legact JIT work again (& adds test for that problem).
llvm-svn: 183068
The MOV64ri64i32 instruction required hacky MCInst lowering because it was
allocated as setting a GR64, but the eventual instruction ("movl") only set a
GR32. This converts it into a so-called "MOV32ri64" which still accepts a
(appropriate) 64-bit immediate but defines a GR32. This is then converted to
the full GR64 by a SUBREG_TO_REG operation, thus keeping everyone happy.
llvm-svn: 182991
Instead of having a bunch of separate MOV8r0, MOV16r0, ... pseudo-instructions,
it's better to use a single MOV32r0 (which will expand to "xorl %reg, %reg")
and obtain other sizes with EXTRACT_SUBREG and SUBREG_TO_REG. The encoding is
smaller and partial register updates can sometimes be avoided.
Until recently, this sequence was a barrier to rematerialization though. That
should now be fixed so it's an appropriate time to make the change.
llvm-svn: 182928
I need to handle this for the test case in my following scheduler
commit.
Work is already under way to redesign the mechanism for node order
propagation because this case by case approach is unmaintainable.
llvm-svn: 179448
To enable a load of a call address to be folded with that call, this
load is moved from outside of callseq into callseq. Such a moving
adds a non-glued node (that load) into a glued sequence. This non-glue
load is only removed when DAG selection folds them into a memory form
call instruction. When such instruction selection is disabled, it breaks
DAG schedule.
To prevent that, such moving is disabled when target favors register
indirect call.
Previous workaround disabling CALL32m/CALL64m insn selection is removed.
llvm-svn: 178308
into their new header subdirectory: include/llvm/IR. This matches the
directory structure of lib, and begins to correct a long standing point
of file layout clutter in LLVM.
There are still more header files to move here, but I wanted to handle
them in separate commits to make tracking what files make sense at each
layer easier.
The only really questionable files here are the target intrinsic
tablegen files. But that's a battle I'd rather not fight today.
I've updated both CMake and Makefile build systems (I think, and my
tests think, but I may have missed something).
I've also re-sorted the includes throughout the project. I'll be
committing updates to Clang, DragonEgg, and Polly momentarily.
llvm-svn: 171366
directly.
This is in preparation for removing the use of the 'Attribute' class as a
collection of attributes. That will shift to the AttributeSet class instead.
llvm-svn: 171253
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
- Besides used in SjLj exception handling, __builtin_setjmp/__longjmp is also
used as a light-weight replacement of setjmp/longjmp which are used to
implementation continuation, user-level threading, and etc. The support added
in this patch ONLY addresses this usage and is NOT intended to support SjLj
exception handling as zero-cost DWARF exception handling is used by default
in X86.
llvm-svn: 165989
We use the enums to query whether an Attributes object has that attribute. The
opaque layer is responsible for knowing where that specific attribute is stored.
llvm-svn: 165488
X86DAGToDAGISel::PreprocessISelDAG(), isel is moving load inside
callseq_start / callseq_end so it can be folded into a call. This can
create a cycle in the DAG when the call is glued to a copytoreg. We
have been lucky this hasn't caused too many issues because the pre-ra
scheduler has special handling of call sequences. However, it has
caused a crash in a specific tailcall case.
rdar://12393897
llvm-svn: 165072
- Merge the processing of LOAD_ADD with other atomic load-arith
operations
- Separate the logic getting target constant for atomic-load-op and add
an optimization for atomic-load-add on i16 with negative value
- Optimize a minor case for atomic-fetch-add i16 with negative operand. Test
case is revised.
llvm-svn: 164243
We don't have enough GR64_TC registers when calling a varargs function
with 6 arguments. Since %al holds the number of vector registers used,
only %r11 is available as a scratch register.
This means that addressing modes using both base and index registers
can't be folded into TCRETURNmi64.
<rdar://problem/12282281>
llvm-svn: 163761
- BlockAddress has no support of BA + offset form and there is no way to
propagate that offset into machine operand;
- Add BA + offset support and a new interface 'getTargetBlockAddress' to
simplify target block address forming;
- All targets are modified to use new interface and X86 backend is enhanced to
support BA + offset addressing.
llvm-svn: 163743
We perform the following:
1> Use SUB instead of CMP for i8,i16,i32 and i64 in ISel lowering.
2> Modify MachineCSE to correctly handle implicit defs.
3> Convert SUB back to CMP if possible at peephole.
Removed pattern matching of (a>b) ? (a-b):0 and like, since they are handled
by peephole now.
rdar://11873276
llvm-svn: 161462
are targeting an ELF platform. Only fold gs-relative (and fs-relative) loads
if it is actually sensible to do so for the target platform.
This fixes PR13438.
llvm-svn: 160687
Corrected type for index of llvm.x86.avx2.gather.d.pd.256
from 256-bit to 128-bit.
Corrected types for src|dst|mask of llvm.x86.avx2.gather.q.ps.256
from 256-bit to 128-bit.
Support the following intrinsics:
llvm.x86.avx2.gather.d.q, llvm.x86.avx2.gather.q.q
llvm.x86.avx2.gather.d.q.256, llvm.x86.avx2.gather.q.q.256
llvm.x86.avx2.gather.d.d, llvm.x86.avx2.gather.q.d
llvm.x86.avx2.gather.d.d.256, llvm.x86.avx2.gather.q.d.256
llvm-svn: 159402
x86 addressing modes. This allows PIE-based TLS offsets to fit directly
into an addressing mode immediate offset, which is the last remaining
code quality issue from PR12380. With this patch, that PR is completely
fixed.
To understand why this patch is correct to match these offsets into
addressing mode immediates, break it down by cases:
1) 32-bit is trivially correct, and unmodified here.
2) 64-bit non-small mode is unchanged and never matches.
3) 64-bit small PIC code which is RIP-relative is handled specially in
the match to try to fit RIP into the base register. If it fails, it
now early exits. This behavior is unchanged by the patch.
4) 64-bit small non-PIC code which is not RIP-relative continues to work
as it did before. The reason these immediates are safe is because the
ABI ensures they fit in small mode. This behavior is unchanged.
5) 64-bit small PIC code which is *not* using RIP-relative addressing.
This is the only case changed by the patch, and the primary place you
see it is in TLS, either the win64 section offset TLS or Linux
local-exec TLS model in a PIC compilation. Here the ABI again ensures
that the immediates fit because we are in small mode, and any other
operations required due to the PIC relocation model have been handled
externally to the Wrapper node (extra loads etc are made around the
wrapper node in ISelLowering).
I've tested this as much as I can comparing it with GCC's output, and
everything appears safe. I discussed this with Anton and it made sense
to him at least at face value. That said, if there are issues with PIC
code after this patch, yell and we can revert it.
llvm-svn: 154304
This allows us to keep passing reduced masks to SimplifyDemandedBits, but
know about all the bits if SimplifyDemandedBits fails. This allows instcombine
to simplify cases like the one in the included testcase.
llvm-svn: 154011
This is a code change to add support for changing instruction sequences of the form:
load
inc/dec of 8/16/32/64 bits
store
into the appropriate X86 inc/dec through memory instruction:
inc[qlwb] / dec[qlwb]
The checks that were in X86DAGToDAGISel::Select(SDNode *Node)>>ISD::STORE have been extracted to isLoadIncOrDecStore and reworked to use the better
named wrappers for getOperand(unsigned) (e.g. getOffset()) and replaced Chain.getNode() with LoadNode. The comments have also been expanded.
llvm-svn: 153635
This is a code change to add support for changing instruction sequences of the form:
load
inc/dec of 8/16/32/64 bits
store
into the appropriate X86 inc/dec through memory instruction:
inc[qlwb] / dec[qlwb]
The checks that were in X86DAGToDAGISel::Select(SDNode *Node)>>ISD::STORE have been extracted to isLoadIncOrDecStore and reworked to use the better
named wrappers for getOperand(unsigned) (e.g. getOffset()) and replaced Chain.getNode() with LoadNode. The comments have also been expanded.
llvm-svn: 153617
If the DEC node had more than one user, it was doing this lowering but
leaving the original DEC node around and so decrementing twice.
Fixes PR11964.
llvm-svn: 150356
same pattern. We already had this pattern is a few places, but others
tried to make a rough approximation of an actual DAG structure. As not
everywhere went to this trouble, nothing could rely on this being done.
In fact, I've checked all references to these node Ids, and the ones
that are using the topo-sort properties are actually satisfied with
a strict-weak-ordering. The requirement appears to be that Use >= Def.
I've added a big blurb of comments to this bit of the transform to
clarify why the order is so important for the next reader of the code.
I'm starting with this change as it is very small, and trivially
reverted if something breaks or the >= above really does need to be >.
If that proves the case, we can hide the problem by reverting this
patch, but the problem exists elsewhere as well, and so a more
comprehensive solution will be needed.
llvm-svn: 148001
hoped this would revive one of the llvm-gcc selfhost build bots, but it
didn't so it doesn't appear that my transform is the culprit.
If anyone else is seeing failures, please let me know!
llvm-svn: 147957
strange build bot failures that look like a miscompile into an infloop.
I'll investigate this tomorrow, but I'd both like to know whether my
patch is the culprit, and get the bots back to green.
llvm-svn: 147945
mask+shift pairs at the beginning of the ISD::AND case block, and then
hoist the final pattern into a helper function, simplifying and
reflowing it appropriately. This should have no observable behavior
change, but several simplifications fell out of this such as directly
computing the new mask constant, etc.
llvm-svn: 147939
extracts and scaled addressing modes into its own helper function. No
functionality changed here, just hoisting and layout fixes falling out
of that hoisting.
llvm-svn: 147937
detect a pattern which can be implemented with a small 'shl' embedded in
the addressing mode scale. This happens in real code as follows:
unsigned x = my_accelerator_table[input >> 11];
Here we have some lookup table that we look into using the high bits of
'input'. Each entity in the table is 4-bytes, which means this
implicitly gets turned into (once lowered out of a GEP):
*(unsigned*)((char*)my_accelerator_table + ((input >> 11) << 2));
The shift right followed by a shift left is canonicalized to a smaller
shift right and masking off the low bits. That hides the shift right
which x86 has an addressing mode designed to support. We now detect
masks of this form, and produce the longer shift right followed by the
proper addressing mode. In addition to saving a (rather large)
instruction, this also reduces stalls in Intel chips on benchmarks I've
measured.
In order for all of this to work, one part of the DAG needs to be
canonicalized *still further* than it currently is. This involves
removing pointless 'trunc' nodes between a zextload and a zext. Without
that, we end up generating spurious masks and hiding the pattern.
llvm-svn: 147936
this substraction will result in small negative numbers at worst which
become very large positive numbers on assignment and are thus caught by
the <=4 check on the next line. The >0 check clearly intended to catch
these as negative numbers.
Spotted by inspection, and impossible to trigger given the shift widths
that can be used.
llvm-svn: 147773
Eric Christopher