The
}; // namespace polly
comment was put at the closing brace of the FunctionToScopPassAdaptor class.
Since no namespace ends here, the comment is misplaced.
Reported-by: Lukas Böhm <lukas.boehm93@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 329302
Summary:
"-fmerge-all-constants" is a non-conforming optimization and should not
be the default. It is also causing miscompiles when building Linux
Kernel (https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/20/872).
Fixes PR18538.
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, chandlerc
Reviewed By: rsmith, chandlerc
Subscribers: srhines, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45289
llvm-svn: 329300
Summary:
Previously, `clang-format` didn't understand lightweight
Objective-C generics, which have the form:
```
@interface Foo <KeyType,
ValueTypeWithConstraint : Foo,
AnotherValueTypeWithGenericConstraint: Bar<Baz>, ... > ...
```
The lightweight generic specifier list appears before the base
class, if present, but because it starts with < like the protocol
specifier list, `UnwrappedLineParser` was getting confused and
failed to parse interfaces with both generics and protocol lists:
```
@interface Foo <KeyType> : NSObject <NSCopying>
```
Since the parsed line would be incomplete, the format result
would be very confused (e.g., https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24381).
This fixes the issue by explicitly parsing the ObjC lightweight
generic conformance list, so the line is fully parsed.
Fixes: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24381
Test Plan: New tests added. Ran tests with:
% make -j16 FormatTests && ./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Reviewers: djasper, jolesiak
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45185
llvm-svn: 329298
After removing it, I got a couple of compile errors because we were
missing some symbols (SIGKILL and such), as their definitions were not
transitively included anymore. I fix this by including csignal from
PosixApi.h, as it's windows version provides a stub definitions of these
symbols. This should make the result of #including PosixApi.h more
consistent across platforms (although in the long run, we should just
get rid of this header).
llvm-svn: 329296
This is triggering on a pattern that's both too broad (const
std::string& members can be used safely) and too narrow (std::string is
not the only class with this problem). It has a very low true positive
rate, just remove it until we find a better solution for dangling string
references.
llvm-svn: 329292
structs.
r326307 and r327870 made changes that allowed using non-trivial C
structs with fields qualified with __strong or __weak. This commit makes
the following C++ triviality type traits available to non-trivial C
structs:
__has_trivial_assign
__has_trivial_move_assign
__has_trivial_copy
__has_trivial_move_constructor
__has_trivial_constructor
__has_trivial_destructor
This reapplies r328680. This commit fixes a bug where the copy/move
__has_trivial_* traits would return false when a volatile type was being
passed. Thanks to Richard Smith for pointing out the mistake.
rdar://problem/33599681
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44913
llvm-svn: 329289
Summary:
The existing Failed() matcher only allowed asserting that the operation
failed, but it was not possible to verify any details of the returned
error.
This patch adds two new matchers, which make this possible:
- Failed<InfoT>() verifies that the operation failed with a single error
of a given type.
- Failed<InfoT>(M) additionally check that the contained error info
object is matched by the nested matcher M.
To make these work, I've changed the implementation of the ErrorHolder
class. Now, instead of just storing the string representation of the
Error, it fetches the ErrorInfo objects and stores then as a list of
shared pointers. This way, ErrorHolder remains copyable, while still
retaining the full information contained in the Error object.
In case the Error object contains two or more errors, the new matchers
will fail to match, instead of trying to match all (or any) of the
individual ErrorInfo objects. This seemed to be the most sensible
behavior for when one wants to match exact error details, but I could be
convinced otherwise...
Reviewers: zturner, lhames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44925
llvm-svn: 329288
A noreturn nounwind function can be expected to never return in any way, and by
never returning it will also never have to restore any callee-saved registers
for its caller. This makes it possible to skip spills of those registers during
function entry, saving some stack space and time in the process. This is rather
useful for embedded targets with limited stack space.
Should fix PR9970.
Patch by myeisha (pmb).
llvm-svn: 329287
For schedule models that don't use itineraries, checkCompleteness still checks that an instruction has a matching itinerary instead of skipping and going straight to matching the InstRWs. That doesn't seem to match what happens in TargetSchedule.cpp
This patch causes problems for a number of models that had been incorrectly flagged as complete.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43235
llvm-svn: 329280
Summary:
This patch extend getTargetDefines and implement handleTargetFeatures
and hasFeature. and define corresponding marco for those features.
Reviewers: asb, apazos, eli.friedman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44727
Patch by Kito Cheng.
llvm-svn: 329278
As was mentioned in comments for D45158,
isPicRel's name does not make much sense,
because what this method does is checks if
we need to create the dynamic relocation or not.
Instead of renaming it to something different,
we can 'isPicRel' completely.
We can reuse the getDynRel method.
They are logically very close, getDynRel can just return
R_*_NONE in case no dynamic relocation should be produced
and that would simplify things and avoid functionality
correlation/duplication with 'isPicRel'.
The patch does this change.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45248
llvm-svn: 329275
This is done in preparation for D45259.
With D45259, models can specify the size of the reorder buffer, and the retire
throughput directly via tablegen.
llvm-svn: 329274
Summary:
Add a new plugin API. This closes the gap between pass registration and out-of-tree passes for the new PassManager.
Unlike with the existing API, interaction with a plugin is always
initiated from the tools perspective. I.e., when a plugin is loaded, it
resolves and calls a well-known symbol `llvmGetPassPluginInfo` to obtain
details about the plugin. The fundamental motivation is to get rid of as
many global constructors as possible. The API exposed by the plugin
info is kept intentionally minimal.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Reviewed By: chandlerc
Subscribers: bollu, grosser, lksbhm, mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35258
llvm-svn: 329273
Currently, LLD print symbol assignment commands to the map file,
but it does not do that for assignments that are outside of the section
descriptions. Such assignments can affect the layout though.
The patch implements the following:
* Teaches LLD to print symbol assignments outside of section declaration.
* Teaches LLD to print PROVIDE/HIDDEN/PROVIDE hidden commands.
In case when symbol is not provided, nothing will be printed.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44894
llvm-svn: 329272
Currently, LLD prints VA, but not LMA in a map file.
It seems can be useful to print both to reveal layout
details and patch implements it.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44899
llvm-svn: 329271
This patch introduces a way to set custom OptPassGate instances to LLVMContext.
A new instance field OptBisector and a new method setOptBisect() are added
to the LLVMContext classes. These changes allow to set a custom OptBisect class
that can make its own decisions on skipping optional passes.
Another important feature of this change is ability to set different instances
of OptPassGate to different LLVMContexts. So the different contexts can be used
independently in several compiling threads of one process.
One unit test is added.
Patch by Yevgeny Rouban.
Reviewers: andrew.w.kaylor, fedor.sergeev, vsk, dberlin, Eugene.Zelenko, reames, skatkov
Reviewed By: andrew.w.kaylor, fedor.sergeev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44464
llvm-svn: 329267
LoopInterchange relies on LoopInfo being up-to-date, so we should
preserve it after interchanging. This patch updates restructureLoops to
move the BBs of the interchanged loops to the right place.
Reviewers: davide, efriedma, karthikthecool, mcrosier
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45278
llvm-svn: 329264
It's failing on the bots and I'm not sure why.
This reverts:
[X86] Synchronize the SchedRW on some EVEX instructions with their VEX equivalents.
[X86] Use WriteFShuffle256 for VEXTRACTF128 to be consistent with VEXTRACTI128 which uses WriteShuffle256.
[X86] Remove some InstRWs for plain store instructions on Sandy Bridge.
[X86] Auto-generate complete checks. NFC
llvm-svn: 329256
We were forcing the latency of these instructions to 5 cycles, but every other scheduler model had them as 1 cycle. I'm sure I didn't get everything, but this gets a big portion.
llvm-svn: 329252
Summary:
If the callsite is inside landing pad, do not perform callsite splitting.
Callsite splitting uses utility function llvm::DuplicateInstructionsInSplitBetween, which eventually calls llvm::SplitEdge. llvm::SplitEdge calls llvm::SplitCriticalEdge with an assumption that the function returns nullptr only when the target edge is not a critical edge (and further assumes that if the return value was not nullptr, the predecessor of the original target edge always has a single successor because critical edge splitting was successful). However, this assumtion is not true because SplitCriticalEdge returns nullptr if the destination block is a landing pad. This invalid assumption results assertion failure.
Fundamental solution might be fixing llvm::SplitEdge to not to rely on the invalid assumption. However, it'll involve a lot of work because current API assumes that llvm::SplitEdge never fails. Instead, this patch makes callsite splitting to not to attempt splitting if the callsite is in a landing pad.
Attached test case will crash with assertion failure without the fix.
Reviewers: fhahn, junbuml, dberlin
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45130
llvm-svn: 329250
Michael Kruse