RELA targets don't read initial .got.plt entries.
REL targets (ARM, x86-32) write the address of the IFUNC resolver to the
entry (`write32le(buf, s.getVA())`).
The default writeIgotPlt() is not meaningful. Make it a no-op. AArch64
and x86-64 will have 0 as initial .got.plt entries associated with
IFUNC.
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72474
down to pass builder in ltobackend.
Currently CodeGenOpts like UnrollLoops/VectorizeLoop/VectorizeSLP in clang
are not passed down to pass builder in ltobackend when new pass manager is
used. This is inconsistent with the behavior when new pass manager is used
and thinlto is not used. Such inconsistency causes slp vectorization pass
not being enabled in ltobackend for O3 + thinlto right now. This patch
fixes that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72386
An undefined weak does not fetch the lazy definition. A lazy weak symbol
should be considered undefined, and thus preemptible if .dynsym exists.
D71795 is not quite an NFC. It errors on an R_X86_64_PLT32 referencing
an undefined weak symbol. isPreemptible is false (incorrect) => R_PLT_PC
is optimized to R_PC => in isStaticLinkTimeConstant, an error is emitted
when an R_PC is applied on an undefined weak (considered absolute).
Weak undefined symbols are preemptible after D71794.
if (sym.isPreemptible)
return false;
if (!config->isPic)
return true;
// isPic means includeInDynsym is true after D71794.
...
// We can delete this if because it can never be true.
if (sym.isUndefWeak)
return true;
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71795
D59275 added the following clause to Symbol::includeInDynsym()
if (isUndefWeak() && Config->Pie && SharedFiles.empty())
return false;
D59549 explored the possibility to generalize it for -no-pie.
GNU ld's rules are architecture dependent and partly controlled by -z
{,no-}dynamic-undefined-weak. Our attempts to mimic its rules are
actually half-baked and don't provide perceivable benefits (it can save
a few more weak undefined symbols in .dynsym in a -static-pie
executable). Let's just delete the rule for simplicity. We will expect
cosmetic inconsistencies with ld.bfd in certain -static-pie scenarios.
This permits a simplification in D71795.
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71794
In AArch64 a branch to an undefined weak symbol that does not have a PLT
entry should resolve to the next instruction. The thunk generation code
can prevent this from happening as a range extension thunk can be generated
if the branch is sufficiently far away from 0, the value of an undefined
weak symbol.
The fix is taken from the Arm implementation of needsThunk(), we prevent a
thunk from being generated to an undefined weak symbol.
fixes pr44451
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72267
```
lld/ELF/Relocations.cpp:1622:56: warning: loop variable 'ts' of type 'const std::pair<ThunkSection *, uint32_t>' (aka 'const pair<lld:🧝:ThunkSection *, unsigned int>') creates a copy from type 'const std::pair<ThunkSection *, uint32_t>' [-Wrange-loop-analysis]
for (const std::pair<ThunkSection *, uint32_t> ts : isd->thunkSections)
```
Drop const qualifier to fix -Wrange-loop-analysis.
We can make -Wrange-loop-analysis warnings (DiagnoseForRangeConstVariableCopies) on `const A` more
permissive on more types (e.g. POD -> trivially copyable), unfortunately it will not make std::pair
good, because `constexpr pair& operator=(const pair& p);` is unfortunately user-defined.
Reviewed By: Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72211
One instance looks like a false positive:
lld/ELF/Relocations.cpp:1622:14: note: use reference type 'const std::pair<ThunkSection *, uint32_t> &' (aka 'cons
t pair<lld:🧝:ThunkSection *, unsigned int> &') to prevent copying
for (const std::pair<ThunkSection *, uint32_t> ts : isd->thunkSections)
It is not changed in this commit.
GCC before r245813 (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79439)
did not emit nop after b/bl. This can happen with recursive calls.
r245813 was back ported to GCC 5.5 and GCC 6.4.
This is common, for example, libstdc++.a(locale.o) shipped with GCC 4.9
and many objects in netlib lapack can cause lld to error. gold allows
such calls to the same section. Our __plt_foo symbol's `section` field
is used for ThunkSection, so we can't implement a similar loosen rule
easily. But we can make use of its `file` field which is currently NULL.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71639
Similar to D71509 (EM_PPC64), on EM_PPC, the IPLT code sequence should
be similar to a PLT call stub. Unlike EM_PPC64, EM_PPC -msecure-plt has
small/large PIC model differences.
* -fpic/-fpie: R_PPC_PLTREL24 r_addend=0. The call stub loads an address relative to `_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_`.
* -fPIC/-fPIE: R_PPC_PLTREL24 r_addend=0x8000. (A partial linked object
file may have an addend larger than 0x8000.) The call stub loads an address relative to .got2+0x8000.
Just assume large PIC model for now. This patch makes:
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -msecure-plt -fno-pie -no-pie a.c
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -msecure-plt -fPIE -pie a.c
#include <stdio.h>
static void impl(void) { puts("meow"); }
void thefunc(void) __attribute__((ifunc("resolver")));
void *resolver(void) { return &impl; }
int main(void) {
thefunc();
void (*theptr)(void) = &thefunc;
theptr();
}
work on Linux glibc. -fpie will crash because the compiler and the
linker do not agree on the value which r30 stores (_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_
vs .got2+0x8000).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71621
Non-preemptible IFUNC are placed in in.iplt (.glink on EM_PPC64). If
there is a non-GOT non-PLT relocation, for pointer equality, we change
the type of the symbol from STT_IFUNC and STT_FUNC and bind it to the
.glink entry.
On EM_386, EM_X86_64, EM_ARM, and EM_AARCH64, the PLT code sequence
loads the address from its associated .got.plt slot. An IPLT also has an
associated .got.plt slot and can use the same code sequence.
On EM_PPC64, the PLT code sequence is actually a bl instruction in
.glink . It jumps to `__glink_PLTresolve` (the PLT header). and
`__glink_PLTresolve` computes the .plt slot (relocated by
R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT).
An IPLT does not have an associated R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT, so we cannot use
`bl` in .iplt . Instead, create a call stub which has a similar code
sequence as PPC64PltCallStub. We don't save the TOC pointer, so such
scenarios will not work: a function pointer to a non-preemptible ifunc,
which resolves to a function defined in another DSO. This is the
restriction described by https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/GNU_IFUNC
(though on many architectures it works in practice):
Requirement (a): Resolver must be defined in the same translation unit as the implementations.
If an ifunc is taken address but not called, technically we don't need
an entry for it, but we currently do that.
This patch makes
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fno-pie -no-pie a.c
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fPIE -pie a.c
#include <stdio.h>
static void impl(void) { puts("meow"); }
void thefunc(void) __attribute__((ifunc("resolver")));
void *resolver(void) { return &impl; }
int main(void) {
thefunc();
void (*theptr)(void) = &thefunc;
theptr();
}
work on Linux glibc and FreeBSD. Calling a function pointer pointing to
a Non-preemptible IFUNC never worked before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71509
This restores commit 1417558e4a and its follow-up, reverted by commit c3dbd782f1.
After this commit:
clang -fuse-ld=bfd -no-pie -nostdlib a.c => .interp not created
clang -fuse-ld=bfd -pie -fPIE -nostdlib a.c => .interp created
clang -fuse-ld=gold -no-pie -nostdlib a.c => .interp not created
clang -fuse-ld=gold -pie -fPIE -nostdlib a.c => .interp created
clang -fuse-ld=lld -no-pie -nostdlib a.c => .interp created
clang -fuse-ld=lld -pie -fPIE -nostdlib a.c => .interp created
This reverts commit 1417558e4a.
Also reverts commit 019a92bb28.
This causes check-sanitizer to fail. The "-Nolib" variant of the test
crashes on startup in the loader.
Similar to rL362355, but with the `!config->shared` guard.
(1) {gcc,clang} -fuse-ld=bfd -pie -fPIE -nostdlib a.c => .interp created
(2) {gcc,clang} -fuse-ld=lld -pie -fPIE -nostdlib a.c => .interp not created
(3) {gcc,clang} -fuse-ld=lld -pie -fPIE -nostdlib a.c a.so => .interp created
The inconsistency of (2) is due to the condition `!Config->SharedFiles.empty()`.
To make lld behave more like ld.bfd, we could change the condition to:
config->hasDynSymTab && !config->dynamicLinker.empty() && script->needsInterpSection();
However, that would bring another inconsistency as can be observed with:
(4) {gcc,clang} -fuse-ld=bfd -no-pie -nostdlib a.c => .interp not created
Linux powerpc discards `*(.gnu.version*)` (arch/powerpc/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S)
to suppress --orphan-handling=warn warnings in the -pie output `.tmp_vmlinux1`
The support is simple. Just add isLive() to:
1) Fix an assertion in SectionBase::getPartition() called by VersionTableSection::isNeeded().
2) Suppress DT_VERSYM, DT_VERDEF, DT_VERNEED and DT_VERNEEDNUM, if the relevant section is discarded.
Reviewed By: grimar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71819
For undef-not-suggest.test, we currently make redundant alternative
spelling suggestions:
```
ld.lld: error: relocation refers to a discarded section: .text.foo
>>> defined in a.o
>>> section group signature: foo
>>> prevailing definition is in a.o
>>> referenced by a.o:(.rodata+0x0)
>>> did you mean:
>>> defined in: a.o
ld.lld: error: relocation refers to a symbol in a discarded section: foo
>>> defined in a.o
>>> section group signature: foo
>>> prevailing definition is in a.o
>>> referenced by a.o:(.rodata+0x8)
>>> did you mean: for
>>> defined in: a.o
```
Reviewed By: grimar, ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71735
Summary:
If none of the input files are ELF object files (for example, when
generating an object file from a single binary input file via
"-b binary"), use a fallback value for the ELF header flags instead
of crashing with an assertion failure.
Reviewers: MaskRay, ruiu, espindola
Reviewed By: MaskRay, ruiu
Subscribers: kevans, grimar, emaste, arichardson, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, llvm-commits, jrtc27
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71101
GNU ld creates the synthetic section .iplt, and has a built-in linker
script that assigns .iplt to the output section .plt . There is no
output section named .iplt .
Making .iplt an output section actually has a benefit that makes the
tricky toolchain feature stand out. Symbolizers don't have to deal with
mixed PLT entries (e.g. llvm-objdump -d incorrectly annotates such jump
targets).
On EM_PPC{,64}, .glink contains a PLT resolver and a series of jump
instructions. The 4-byte entry size makes it unnecessary to have an
alignment of 16.
Mark ppc32-gnu-ifunc.s and ppc32-gnu-ifunc-nonpreemptable.s as `XFAIL: *`.
They test IPLT on EM_PPC, which never works.
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71520
PltSection is used by both PLT and IPLT. The PLT section may have a
header while the IPLT section does not. Split off IpltSection from
PltSection to be clearer.
Unlike other targets, PPC64 cannot use the same code sequence for PLT
and IPLT. This helps make a future PPC64 patch (D71509) more isolated.
On EM_386 and EM_X86_64, when PLT is empty while IPLT is not, currently
we are inconsistent whether the PLT header is conceptually attached to
in.plt or in.iplt . Consistently attach the header to in.plt can make
the -z retpolineplt logic simpler. It also makes `jmp` point to an
aesthetically better place for non-retpolineplt cases.
Reviewed By: grimar, ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71519
This change only affects EM_386. relOff can be computed from `index`
easily, so it is unnecessarily passed as a parameter.
Both in.plt and in.iplt entries are written by writePLT. For in.iplt,
the instruction `push reloc_offset` will change because `index` is now
different. Fortunately, this does not matter because `push; jmp` is only
used by PLT. IPLT does not need the code sequence.
Reviewed By: grimar, ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71518
This reverts commit 2bbd32f5e8, it was
causing UBSan failures like the following:
lld/ELF/Target.cpp:103:41: runtime error: applying non-zero offset 24 to null pointer
When a common symbol is merged with a shared symbol, increase st_size if
the shared symbol has a larger st_size. At runtime, the executable's
symbol overrides the shared symbol. The shared symbol may be created
from common symbols in a previous link. This rule makes sure we pick
the largest size among all common symbols.
This behavior matches GNU ld. See
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25236 for discussions.
A shared symbol does not hold alignment constraints. Ignore the
alignment update.
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71161
Summary:
So far it seems like the only test affected by this change is the one I
recently added for R_MIPS_JALR relocations since the other test cases that
use this function early (unknown-relocation-*) do not have a valid input
section for the relocation offset.
Reviewers: ruiu, grimar, MaskRay, espindola
Reviewed By: ruiu, MaskRay
Subscribers: emaste, sdardis, jrtc27, atanasyan, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70659
On some edge cases such as Chromium compiled with full instrumentation we
have a .text section over twice the size of the maximum branch range and
the instrumented code generation containing many examples of the erratum
sequence. The combination of Thunks and many erratum sequences causes
finalizeAddressDependentContent() to not converge. We end up with:
start
- Thunk Creation (disturbs addresses after thunks, creating more patches)
- Patch Creation (disturbs addresses after patches, creating more thunks)
- goto start
In most images with few thunks and patches the mutual disturbance does not
cause convergence problems. As the .text size and number of patches go up
the risk increases.
A way to prevent the thunk creation from interfering with patch creation is
to round up the size of the thunks to a 4KiB boundary when the
erratum patch is enabled. As the erratum sequence only triggers when an
instruction sequence starts at 0xff8 or 0xffc modulo (4 KiB) by making the
thunks not affect addresses modulo (4 KiB) we prevent thunks from
interfering with the patch.
The patches themselves could be aggregated in the same way that Thunks are
within ThunkSections and we could round up the size in the same way. This
would reduce the number of patches created in a .text section size >
128 MiB but would not likely help convergence problems.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71281
fixes (remaining part of) pr44071, other part in D71242
The code to insert patch section merges them with a comparison function that
uses logic of the form:
return (isa<PatchSection>(a) && !isa<PatchSection>(b));
If the PatchSections don't implement classof this check fails if b is also
a SyntheticSection. This can result in the patches being out of range if
the SyntheticSection is big, for example a ThunkSection with lots of thunks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71242
fixes (part of) pr44071
clang/gcc -fdebug-type-sections places .debug_types and
.rela.debug_types in a section group, with a signature symbol which
represents the type signature. The section group is for deduplication
purposes.
After D70146, we will discard such section groups. Refine the rule so
that we will retain the group if no member has the SHF_ALLOC flag.
GNU ld has a similar rule to retain the group if all members have the
SEC_DEBUGGING flag. We try to be more general for future-proof purposes:
if other non-SHF_ALLOC sections have deduplication needs, they may be
placed in a section group. Don't discard them.
Reviewed By: grimar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71157
Fixes PPC64 part of PR40438
// clang -target ppc64le -c a.cc
// .text.unlikely may be placed in a separate output section (via -z keep-text-section-prefix)
// The distance between bar in .text.unlikely and foo in .text may be larger than 32MiB.
static void foo() {}
__attribute__((section(".text.unlikely"))) static int bar() { foo(); return 0; }
__attribute__((used)) static int dummy = bar();
This patch makes such thunks with addends work for PPC64.
AArch64: .text -> `__AArch64ADRPThunk_ (adrp x16, ...; add x16, x16, ...; br x16)` -> target
PPC64: .text -> `__long_branch_ (addis 12, 2, ...; ld 12, ...(12); mtctr 12; bctr)` -> target
AArch64 can leverage ADRP to jump to the target directly, but PPC64
needs to load an address from .branch_lt . Before Power ISA v3.0, the
PC-relative ADDPCIS was not available. .branch_lt was invented to work
around the limitation.
Symbol::ppc64BranchltIndex is replaced by
PPC64LongBranchTargetSection::entry_index which take addends into
consideration.
The tests are rewritten: ppc64-long-branch.s tests -no-pie and
ppc64-long-branch-pi.s tests -pie and -shared.
Reviewed By: sfertile
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70937
replaceWithDefined is used by canonical PLT and copy relocations, which
imply that the symbol is preemptable. ppc64BranchltIndex is only used by
non-preemptable cases, and it can only be the default value in
replaceWithDefined.
The .note.gnu.property SHT_NOTE sections on AArch64 (a 64-bit target)
should have alignment 8 to more closely match the binutils implementation
where alignment is 4-bytes on 32-bit machines and 8-bytes on 64-bit
machines.
Previously LLD was using 4 for both 32-bit and 64-bit machines.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70962
The PT_GNU_PROPERTY program header describes the location of the
.note.gnu.property SHT_NOTES section. The linux kernel uses this program
header to find the .note.gnu.property section rather than parsing.
Executables that have properties that the kernel needs to act on that don't
have the PT_GNU_PROPERTY program header will not boot.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70961
Fixes AArch64 part of PR40438
The current range extension thunk framework does not handle a relocation
relative to a STT_SECTION symbol with a non-zero addend, which may be
used by jumps/calls to local functions on some RELA targets (AArch64,
powerpc ELFv1, powerpc64 ELFv2, etc). See PR40438 and the following
code for examples:
// clang -target $target a.cc
// .text.cold may be placed in a separate output section.
// The distance between bar in .text.cold and foo in .text may be larger than 128MiB.
static void foo() {}
__attribute__((section(".text.cold"))) static int bar() { foo(); return
0; }
__attribute__((used)) static int dummy = bar();
This patch makes such thunks with addends work for AArch64. The target
independent part can be reused by PPC in the future.
On REL targets (ARM, MIPS), jumps/calls are not represented as
STT_SECTION + non-zero addend (see
MCELFObjectTargetWriter::needsRelocateWithSymbol), so they don't need
this feature, but we need to make sure this patch does not affect them.
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70637
ThunkCreator::getThunk and ThunkCreator::normalizeExistingThunk
currently assume that the implicit addends are -8 for ARM and -4 for
Thumb. In D70637, ThunkCreator::getThunk will need to take care of the
relocation addend explicitly.
Add the utility function getPCBias() as a prerequisite so that the getThunk change in D70637
can be more general.
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70690
Fangrui Song