This addresses:
-Clean up the source code
-Refactor the JSON fields
-Fix the test cases
-Improve the docs for the stats output
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77789
Summary:
This change makes the labels on the x-axis of a comparison chart look
like: "0%", "(0%, 10%)", "[10%, 20%)", and so on.
Previously, each label was the same (a concatenation of all the possible
coverage buckets).
Reviewers: djtodoro
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77155
When using the option, draw the histogram representing the debug
location buckets. The resulting histogram will be saved in a png
file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71869
Making these changes, the code becomes more robust and easier for
adding the new features.
-Introduce the LocationStats class representing the statistics
-Add the pretty_print() method in the LocationStats class
-Add additional '-' for the program options
-Add the verify_program_inputs() function
-Add the parse_locstats() function
-Rename 'results' => 'opts'
-Add more comments
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71868
Though llvm-locstat is a "util" it requires llvm-dwarfdump
to be useful. So what happens now is that unless LLVM_BUILD_TOOLS
is ON llvm-locstats won't be part of the "all" target.
However given that it requires llvm-dwarfdump, this is less
confusing/build time consuming than suddenly having llvm-dwarfdump
build when all other tools are disabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71705
utils and tools are not being built.
This was uncovered by: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71611
Which added llvm-locstats to the test dependencies.
Previously the build target was only added if you
were building tools. This meant that you couldn't
configure at all if you had LLVM_BUILD_TOOLS=OFF.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71695
Summary:
This is a follow up for D70548.
Currently, variables with debug info coverage between 0% and 1% are put into
zero-bucket. D70548 changed the way statistics calculate a variable's coverage:
we began to use enclosing scope rather than a possible variable life range.
Thus more variables might be moved to zero-bucket despite they have some debug
info coverage.
The patch is to distinguish between a variable that has location info but
it's significantly less than its enclosing scope and a variable that doesn't
have it at all.
Reviewers: djtodoro, aprantl, dblaikie, avl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71070
Summary:
This changes the representation of 'coverage buckets' in llvm-dwarfdump and
llvm-locstats to one that makes more clear what the buckets contain.
See some related details in D71070.
Reviewers: djtodoro, aprantl, cmtice, jhenderson
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71366
If the total number of PC range bytes in each variable's enclosing scope
('scope bytes total') is 0, we will have division by zero.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71415
Summary:
The patch removes OffsetToFirstDefinition in the 'scope bytes total'
statistic computation. Thus it unifies the way the scope and the coverage
buckets are computed. The rationals behind that are the following:
1. OffsetToFirstDefinition was used to calculate the variable's life range.
However, there is no simple way to do it accurately, so the scope calculated
this way might be misleading. See D69027 for more details on the subject.
2. Both 'scope bytes total' and coverage buckets seem to be intended
to represent the same data in different ways. Otherwise, the statistics
might be controversial and confusing.
Note that the approach gives up a thorough evaluation of debug information
completeness (i.e. coverage buckets by themselves doesn't tell how good
the debug information is). Only changes in coverage over time make
a 'physical' sense.
Reviewers: djtodoro, aprantl, vsk, dblaikie, avl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70548
The tool reports verbose output for the DWARF debug location coverage.
The llvm-locstats for each variable or formal parameter DIE computes what
percentage from the code section bytes, where it is in scope, it has
location description. The line 0 shows the number (and the percentage) of
DIEs with no location information, but the line 100 shows the number (and
the percentage) of DIEs where there is location information in all code
section bytes (where the variable or parameter is in the scope). The line
50..59 shows the number (and the percentage) of DIEs where the location
information is in between 50 and 59 percentage of its scope covered.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66526
The cause of the test failure was resolved.
llvm-svn: 373427
The tool reports verbose output for the DWARF debug location coverage.
The llvm-locstats for each variable or formal parameter DIE computes what
percentage from the code section bytes, where it is in scope, it has
location description. The line 0 shows the number (and the percentage) of
DIEs with no location information, but the line 100 shows the number (and
the percentage) of DIEs where there is location information in all code
section bytes (where the variable or parameter is in the scope). The line
50..59 shows the number (and the percentage) of DIEs where the location
information is in between 50 and 59 percentage of its scope covered.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66526
llvm-svn: 373317
The tool reports verbose output for the DWARF debug location coverage.
The llvm-locstats for each variable or formal parameter DIE computes what
percentage from the code section bytes, where it is in scope, it has
location description. The line 0 shows the number (and the percentage) of
DIEs with no location information, but the line 100 shows the number (and
the percentage) of DIEs where there is location information in all code
section bytes (where the variable or parameter is in the scope). The line
50..59 shows the number (and the percentage) of DIEs where the location
information is in between 50 and 59 percentage of its scope covered.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66526
llvm-svn: 373183
The tool reports verbose output for the DWARF debug location coverage.
The llvm-locstats for each variable or formal parameter DIE computes what
percentage from the code section bytes, where it is in scope, it has
location description. The line 0 shows the number (and the percentage) of
DIEs with no location information, but the line 100 shows the number (and
the percentage) of DIEs where there is location information in all code
section bytes (where the variable or parameter is in the scope). The line
50..59 shows the number (and the percentage) of DIEs where the location
information is in between 50 and 59 percentage of its scope covered.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66526
llvm-svn: 372554
The tool reports verbose output for the DWARF debug location coverage.
The llvm-locstats for each variable or formal parameter DIE computes what
percentage from the code section bytes, where it is in scope, it has
location description. The line 0 shows the number (and the percentage) of
DIEs with no location information, but the line 100 shows the number (and
the percentage) of DIEs where there is location information in all code
section bytes (where the variable or parameter is in the scope). The line
50..59 shows the number (and the percentage) of DIEs where the location
information is in between 50 and 59 percentage of its scope covered.
The tool will be very useful for tracking improvements regarding the
"debugging optimized code" support with LLVM ecosystem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66526
llvm-svn: 371520
djtodoro