As suggested by Pavel in a code review:
> Can we replace this (and maybe python too, while at it) with a
> Host/Config.h entry? A global definition means that one has to
> recompile everything when these change in any way, whereas in
> practice only a handful of files need this..
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71280
GetMaxU64Bitfield(...) uses the ul suffix but we require a 64 bit unsigned integer and ul could be 32 bit. So this replacing it with a explicit cast and refactors the code around it to use an early exit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70992
Summary:
Yet another step on the long road towards getting rid of lldb's Stream class.
We probably should just make this some kind of member of Address/AddressRange, but it seems quite often we just push
in random integers in there and this is just about getting rid of Stream and not improving arbitrary APIs.
I had to rename another `DumpAddress` function in FormatEntity that is dumping the content of an address to make Clang happy.
Reviewers: labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71052
Summary:
This patch adds code which will substitute references to the full object
constructors/destructors with their base object versions.
Like all substitutions in this category, this operation is not really
sound, but doing this in a more precise way allows us to get rid of a
much larger hack -- matching function according to their demangled
names, which effectively does the same thing, but also much more.
This is a (very late) follow-up to D54074.
Background: clang has an optimization which can eliminate full object
structors completely, if they are found to be equivalent to their base
object versions. It does this because it assumes they can be regenerated
on demand in the compile unit that needs them (e.g., because they are
declared inline). However, this doesn't work for the debugging scenario,
where we don't have the structor bodies available -- we pretend all
constructors are defined out-of-line as far as clang is concerned. This
causes clang to emit references to the (nonexisting) full object
structors during expression evaluation.
Fun fact: This is not a problem on darwin, because the relevant
optimization is disabled to work around a linker bug.
Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70721
Summary:
This patch fixes a bug where when target triple created from elf information
is arm-*-linux-eabihf and platform triple is armv8l-*-linux-gnueabihf. Merging
both triple results in armv8l--unknown-unknown.
This happens because we order a triple update while calling CoreUpdated and
CoreUpdated creates a new triple with no vendor or environment information.
Making sure we do not update triple and just update to more specific core
fixes the issue.
Reviewers: labath, jasonmolenda, clayborg
Reviewed By: jasonmolenda
Subscribers: jankratochvil, kristof.beyls, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70155
Summary:
The FileSpec class is often used as a sort of a pattern -- one specifies
a bare file name to search, and we check if in matches the full file
name of an existing module (for example).
These comparisons used FileSpec::Equal, which had some support for it
(via the full=false argument), but it was not a good fit for this job.
For one, it did a symmetric comparison, which makes sense for a function
called "equal", but not for typical searches (when searching for
"/foo/bar.so", we don't want to find a module whose name is just
"bar.so"). This resulted in patterns like:
if (FileSpec::Equal(pattern, file, pattern.GetDirectory()))
which would request a "full" match only if the pattern really contained
a directory. This worked, but the intended behavior was very unobvious.
On top of that, a lot of the code wanted to handle the case of an
"empty" pattern, and treat it as matching everything. This resulted in
conditions like:
if (pattern && !FileSpec::Equal(pattern, file, pattern.GetDirectory())
which are nearly impossible to decipher.
This patch introduces a FileSpec::Match function, which does exactly
what most of FileSpec::Equal callers want, an asymmetric match between a
"pattern" FileSpec and a an actual FileSpec. Empty paterns match
everything, filename-only patterns match only the filename component.
I've tried to update all callers of FileSpec::Equal to use a simpler
interface. Those that hardcoded full=true have been changed to use
operator==. Those passing full=pattern.GetDirectory() have been changed
to use FileSpec::Match.
There was also a handful of places which hardcoded full=false. I've
changed these to use FileSpec::Match too. This is a slight change in
semantics, but it does not look like that was ever intended, and it was
more likely a result of a misunderstanding of the "proper" way to use
FileSpec::Equal.
[In an ideal world a "FileSpec" and a "FileSpec pattern" would be two
different types, but given how widespread FileSpec is, it is unlikely
we'll get there in one go. This at least provides a good starting point
by centralizing all matching behavior.]
Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere, jdoerfert
Subscribers: emaste, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70851
Summary:
A most of these tests create FileSpecs with a hardcoded style. Add
utility functions which create a file spec of a given style to simplify
things.
While in there add SCOPED_TRACE messages to tests which loop over
multiple inputs to ensure it's clear which of the inputs failed.
Reviewers: teemperor
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70814
Summary:
I recently re-discovered that the unsinged stream operators of the
lldb_private::Stream class have a surprising behavior in that they print
the number in hex. This is all the more confusing because the "signed"
versions of those operators behave normally.
Now that, thanks to Raphael, each Stream class has a llvm::raw_ostream
wrapper, I think we should delete most of our formatting capabilities
and just delegate to that. This patch tests the water by just deleting
the operators with the most surprising behavior.
Most of the code using these operators was printing user_id_t values. It
wasn't fully consistent about prefixing them with "0x", but I've tried
to consistenly print it without that prefix, to make it more obviously
different from pointer values.
Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere, jdoerfert
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70241
Summary:
Clang's raw Lexer doesn't produce any tokens for trailing backslashes in a line. This doesn't work with
LLDB's Clang highlighter which builds the source code to display from the list of tokens the Lexer returns.
This causes that lines with trailing backslashes are lacking the backslash and the following newline when
rendering source code in LLDB.
This patch removes the trailing newline from the current line we are highlighting. This way Clang doesn't
drop the backslash token and we just restore the newline after tokenising.
Fixes rdar://57091487
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, labath
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere, labath
Subscribers: labath, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70177
Summary:
This patch updates the last user of ArgInfo::count and deletes
it. I also delete `GetNumInitArguments()` and `GetInitArgInfo()`.
Classess are callables and `GetArgInfo()` should work on them.
On python 3 it already works, of course. `inspect` is good.
On python 2 we have to add yet another special case. But hey if
python 2 wasn't crufty we wouln't need python 3.
I also delete `is_bound_method` becuase it is unused.
This path is tested in `TestStepScripted.py`
Reviewers: labath, mgorny, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: labath, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69742
This is a quick followup to this commit:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rGa69bbe02a2352271e8b14542073f177e24c499c1
In that, I #pragma-squelch this warning in `ScriptInterpreterPython.cpp`
but we get the same warning in `PythonTestSuite.cpp`.
This patch squelches the same warning in the same way as the
reviweed commit. I'm submitting it without review under the
"obviously correct" rule.
At least if this is incorrect the main commit was also incorrect.
By the way, as far as I can tell, these functions are extern "C" because
SWIG does that to everything, not because they particularly need to be.
Summary:
Move breakpoints from the old, bad ArgInfo::count to the new, better
ArgInfo::max_positional_args. Soon ArgInfo::count will be no more.
It looks like this functionality is already well tested by
`TestBreakpointCommandsFromPython.py`, so there's no need to write
additional tests for it.
Reviewers: labath, jingham, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69468
The goal of this refactor is to enable ProcessMinidump to take into
account the loaded modules and their sections when computing the
permissions of various ranges of memory, as discussed in D66638.
This patch moves some of the responsibility for computing the ranges
from MinidumpParser into ProcessMinidump. MinidumpParser still does the
parsing, but ProcessMinidump becomes responsible for answering the
actual queries about memory ranges. This will enable it (in a follow-up
patch) to augment the information obtained from the parser with data
obtained from actual object files.
The changes in the actual code are fairly straight-forward and just
involve moving code around. MinidumpParser::GetMemoryRegions is renamed
to BuildMemoryRegions to emphasize that it does no caching. The only new
thing is the additional bool flag returned from this function. This
indicates whether the returned regions describe all memory mapped into
the target process. Data obtained from /proc/maps and the MemoryInfoList
stream is considered to be exhaustive. Data obtained from Memory(64)List
is not. This will be used to determine whether we need to augment the
data or not.
This reshuffle means that it is no longer possible/easy to test some of
this code via unit tests, as constructing a ProcessMinidump instance is
hard. Instead, I update the unit tests to only test the parsing of the
actual data, and test the answering of queries through a lit test using
the "memory region" command. The patch also includes some tweaks to the
MemoryRegion class to make the unit tests easier to write.
Reviewers: amccarth, clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69035
For example, it is pretty easy to write a breakpoint command that implements "stop when my caller is Foo", and
it is pretty easy to write a breakpoint command that implements "stop when my caller is Bar". But there's no
way to write a generic "stop when my caller is..." function, and then specify the caller when you add the
command to a breakpoint.
With this patch, you can pass this data in a SBStructuredData dictionary. That will get stored in
the PythonCommandBaton for the breakpoint, and passed to the implementation function (if it has the right
signature) when the breakpoint is hit. Then in lldb, you can say:
(lldb) break com add -F caller_is -k caller_name -v Foo
More generally this will allow us to write reusable Python breakpoint commands.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68671
Looks like on windows googlemock regexes treat newlines differently
from on darwin. This patch fixes the regex in this test so it
will work on both.
Fixes: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69214
llvm-svn: 375477
Summary:
With this patch, only the no-argument form of `Reset()` remains in
PythonDataObjects. It also deletes PythonExceptionState in favor of
PythonException, because the only call-site of PythonExceptionState was
also using Reset, so I cleaned up both while I was there.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, clayborg, labath, jingham
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69214
llvm-svn: 375475
Summary:
This deletes `Reset(...)`, except for the no-argument form `Reset()`
from `TypedPythonObject`, and therefore from `PythonString`, `PythonList`,
etc.
It updates the various callers to use assignment, `As<>`, `Take<>`,
and `Retain<>`, as appropriate.
followon to https://reviews.llvm.org/D69080
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, clayborg, labath, jingham
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69133
llvm-svn: 375350
Summary:
When users define a debugger command from python, they provide a callable
object. Because the signature of the function has been extended, LLDB
needs to inspect the number of parameters the callable can take.
The rule it was using to decide was weird, apparently not tested, and
giving wrong results for some kinds of python callables.
This patch replaces the weird rule with a simple one: if the callable can
take 5 arguments, it gets the 5 argument version of the signature.
Otherwise it gets the old 4 argument version.
It also adds tests with a bunch of different kinds of python callables
with both 4 and 5 arguments.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, clayborg, labath, jingham
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69014
llvm-svn: 375333
Summary: The types defined for it in LLDB are now redundant with core types.
Reviewers: labath, clayborg
Reviewed By: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68658
llvm-svn: 375243
Summary:
I'd like to eliminate all forms of Reset() and all public constructors
on these objects, so the only way to make them is with Take<> and Retain<>
and the only way to copy or move them is with actual c++ copy, move, or
assignment.
This is a simple place to start.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, clayborg, labath, jingham
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69080
llvm-svn: 375182
Summary:
The current implementation of PythonCallable::GetNumArguments
is not exception safe, has weird semantics, and is just plain
incorrect for some kinds of functions.
Python 3.3 introduces inspect.signature, which lets us easily
query for function signatures in a sane and documented way.
This patch leaves the old implementation in place for < 3.3,
but uses inspect.signature for modern pythons. It also leaves
the old weird semantics in place, but with FIXMEs grousing about
it. We should update the callers and fix the semantics in a
subsequent patch. It also adds some tests.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, clayborg, labath, jingham
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68995
llvm-svn: 375181
This patch removes the size_t return value and the append parameter
from the remainder of the Find.* functions in LLDB's internal API. As
in the previous patches, this is motivated by the fact that these
parameters aren't really used, and in the case of the append parameter
were frequently implemented incorrectly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69119
llvm-svn: 375160
Summary:
The previous attempt at making nameless process not match when searching for a
given name failed because the macos implementation was depending on this detail
in its partial matching strategy. Doing partial matching to avoid expensive
lookups is a perfectly valid thing to do, the way it was implemented seems
somewhat unexpected.
This patch implements it differently by providing special
methods in the ProcessInstanceInfoMatch which match only a subset of fields,
and changes mac host code to use those instead.
Then, it re-applies r373925 to get make the ProcessInstanceInfoMatch with a
name *not* match a nameless process.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, teemperor, jingham
Subscribers: wallace, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68631
llvm-svn: 374529
This patch adds an implementation of unwinding using PE EH info. It allows to
get almost ideal call stacks on 64-bit Windows systems (except some epilogue
cases, but I believe that they can be fixed with unwind plan disassembly
augmentation in the future).
To achieve the goal the CallFrameInfo abstraction was made. It is based on the
DWARFCallFrameInfo class interface with a few changes to make it less
DWARF-specific.
To implement the new interface for PECOFF object files the class PECallFrameInfo
was written. It uses the next helper classes:
- UnwindCodesIterator helps to iterate through UnwindCode structures (and
processes chained infos transparently);
- EHProgramBuilder with the use of UnwindCodesIterator constructs EHProgram;
- EHProgram is, by fact, a vector of EHInstructions. It creates an abstraction
over the low-level unwind codes and simplifies work with them. It contains
only the information that is relevant to unwinding in the unified form. Also
the required unwind codes are read from the object file only once with it;
- EHProgramRange allows to take a range of EHProgram and to build an unwind row
for it.
So, PECallFrameInfo builds the EHProgram with EHProgramBuilder, takes the ranges
corresponding to every offset in prologue and builds the rows of the resulted
unwind plan. The resulted plan covers the whole range of the function except the
epilogue.
Reviewers: jasonmolenda, asmith, amccarth, clayborg, JDevlieghere, stella.stamenova, labath, espindola
Reviewed By: jasonmolenda
Subscribers: leonid.mashinskiy, emaste, mgorny, aprantl, arichardson, MaskRay, lldb-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67347
llvm-svn: 374528
Unwind plan augmentation should compute the plan row at offset x from
the instruction before offset x, but currently we compute it from the
instruction at offset x. Note that this behavior is a regression
introduced when moving the x86 assembly inspection engine to its own
file
(1c9858b298 (diff-375a2be066db6f34bb9a71442c9b71fcL913));
the original version handled this properly by copying the previous
instruction out before advancing the instruction pointer.
The relevant bug with more info is here: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43561
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68454
Patch by Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@google.com>.
llvm-svn: 374342
EXPECT_EQ contains an if-else statement. It also contains some magic to
suppress the dangling else warnings, but it seems that some new
compilers can see through that...
llvm-svn: 374341
Summary:
The `if (*cstr_end == '\0')` in the previous code checked if the previous loop terminated because it
found a null terminator or because it reached the end of the data. However, in the case that we hit
the end of the data before finding a null terminator, `cstr_end` points behind the last byte in our
data and `*cstr_end` reads the memory behind the array (which may be uninitialised)
This patch just rewrites that function use `std::find` and adds the relevant unit tests.
Reviewers: labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: abidh, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68773
llvm-svn: 374311
Jonas Devlieghere