This allows targets to make more decisions about reserved registers
after isel. For example, now it should be certain there are calls or
stack objects in the frame or not, which could have been introduced by
legalization.
Patch by Matthias Braun
llvm-svn: 363757
In this patch SelectionDAG tries to salvage any dbg.values that are going to be
dropped, in case they can be recovered from Values in the current BB. It also
strengthens SelectionDAGs handling of dangling debug data, so that dbg.values
are *always* emitted (as Undef or otherwise) instead of dangling forever.
The motivation behind this patch exists in the new test case: a memory address
(here a bitcast and GEP) exist in one basic block, and a dbg.value referring to
the address is left in the 'next' block. The base pointer is live across all
basic blocks. In current llvm trunk the dbg.value cannot be encoded, and it
isn't even emitted as an Undef DBG_VALUE.
The change is simply: if we're definitely going to drop a dbg.value, repeatedly
apply salvageDebugInfo to its operand until either we find something that can
be encoded, or we can't salvage any further in which case we produce an Undef
DBG_VALUE. To know when we're "definitely going to drop a dbg.value",
SelectionDAG signals SelectionDAGBuilder when all IR instructions have been
encoded to force salvaging. This ensures that any dbg.value that's dangling
after DAG creation will have a corresponding DBG_VALUE encoded.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57694
llvm-svn: 353954
Currently, dbg.value's of "nullptr" are dropped when entering a SelectionDAG --
apparently just because of an oversight when recognising Values that are
constant (see PR39787). This patch adds ConstantPointerNull to the list of
constants that can be turned into DBG_VALUEs.
The matter of what bit-value a null pointer constant in LLVM has was raised
in this mailing list thread:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-December/128234.html
Where it transpires LLVM relies on (IR) null pointers being zero valued,
thus I've baked this assumption into the patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55227
llvm-svn: 348753
The debug-use flag must be set exactly for uses on DBG_VALUEs. This is
so obvious that it can be trivially inferred while parsing. This will
reduce noise when printing while omitting an information that has little
value to the user.
The parser will keep recognizing the flag for compatibility with old
`.mir` files.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53903
llvm-svn: 345671
In order to set breakpoints on labels and list source code around
labels, we need collect debug information for labels, i.e., label
name, the function label belong, line number in the file, and the
address label located. In order to keep these information in LLVM
IR and to allow backend to generate debug information correctly.
We create a new kind of metadata for labels, DILabel. The format
of DILabel is
!DILabel(scope: !1, name: "foo", file: !2, line: 3)
We hope to keep debug information as much as possible even the
code is optimized. So, we create a new kind of intrinsic for label
metadata to avoid the metadata is eliminated with basic block.
The intrinsic will keep existing if we keep it from optimized out.
The format of the intrinsic is
llvm.dbg.label(metadata !1)
It has only one argument, that is the DILabel metadata. The
intrinsic will follow the label immediately. Backend could get the
label metadata through the intrinsic's parameter.
We also create DIBuilder API for labels to be used by Frontend.
Frontend could use createLabel() to allocate DILabel objects, and use
insertLabel() to insert llvm.dbg.label intrinsic in LLVM IR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45024
Patch by Hsiangkai Wang.
llvm-svn: 331841
Summary:
When building the selection DAG we sometimes need to postpone
the handling of a dbg.value until the value it should refer to
is created. This is done by using the DanglingDebugInfoMap.
In the past this map has been limited to hold one dangling
dbg.value per value. This patch removes that restriction.
Reviewers: aprantl, rnk, probinson, vsk
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: Ka-Ka, llvm-commits, JDevlieghere
Tags: #debug-info
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44610
llvm-svn: 328084
Summary:
1) Make sure to discard dangling debug info if the variable (or
variable fragment) is mapped to something new before we had a
chance to resolve the dangling debug info.
2) When resolving debug info, make sure to bump the associated
SDNodeOrder to ensure that the DBG_VALUE is emitted after the
instruction that defines the value used in the DBG_VALUE.
This will avoid a debug-use before def scenario as seen in
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36417.
The new test case, test/DebugInfo/X86/sdag-dangling-dbgvalue.ll,
show some other limitations in how dangling debug info is
handled in the SelectionDAG. Since we currently only support
having one dangling dbg.value per Value, we will end up dropping
debug info when there are more than one variable that is described
by the same "dangling value".
Reviewers: aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: aprantl, eraman, llvm-commits, JDevlieghere
Tags: #debug-info
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44369
llvm-svn: 327303
Matt Arsenault