The 0x66 prefix toggles between 16-bit and 32-bit addressing mode.
So in 32-bit mode it is used to switch to 16-bit addressing mode for the
following instruction, while in 16-bit mode it's the other way round — it's
used to switch to 32-bit mode instead.
Thus, emit the 0x66 prefix byte for OpSize only in 32-bit (and 64-bit) mode,
and introduce a new OpSize16 bit which is used in 16-bit mode instead.
This is just the basic infrastructure for that change; a subsequent patch
will add the new OpSize16 bit to the 32-bit instructions that need it.
Patch from David Woodhouse.
llvm-svn: 198586
This is not really expected to work right yet. Mostly because we will
still emit the OpSize (0x66) prefix in all the wrong places, along with
a number of other corner cases. Those will all be fixed in the subsequent
commits.
Patch from David Woodhouse.
llvm-svn: 198584
There is a wrong assumption that the vector element type and the
type of each ConstantSDNode in the build_vector were the same.
However, when promoting the integer operand of a legally typed
build_vector, the operand type and the vector element type do not
need to be the same
(See method 'DAGTypeLegalizer::PromoteIntOp_BUILD_VECTOR' in
LegalizeIntegerTypes.cpp).
in AArch64 backend, the following dag sequence:
C0: i1 = Constant<0>
C1: i1 = Constant<-1>
V: v8i1 = BUILD_VECTOR C1, C1, C0, C0, C0, C0, C0, C0
is type-legalized into:
NewC0: i32 = Constant<0>
NewC1: i32 = Constant<1>
V: v8i8 = BUILD_VECTOR NewC1, NewC1, NewC0, NewC0, NewC0, NewC0, NewC0, NewC0
Forcing a getZeroExtend to VTBits to ensure that the new constant
is correctly.
llvm-svn: 198582
This moves the check up into the parent class so that all targets can use it
without having to copy (and keep in sync) the same error message.
llvm-svn: 198579
Move the ARM EHABI unwind opcode definitions from the ARM MCTargetDesc into LLVM
Support. This enables sharing of the definitions across the ARM target code as
well as llvm-readobj. This will allow implementation of the unwind decoding in
llvm-readobj.
llvm-svn: 198576
Add some tests to validate correct register selection, including a fix
to an existing test which was requiring the *wrong* output.
Patch from David Woodhouse.
llvm-svn: 198566
Before:
enum ShortEnum {
A,
B,
C
};
After:
enum ShortEnum { A, B, C };
This seems to be the predominant choice in LLVM/Clang as well as in
Google style.
llvm-svn: 198558
Missed this when adding the skeleton analysis. Caught by a build break
in the next patch I'm working on when trying to use the analysis.
llvm-svn: 198556
It was previously enabled in both but should only have been part of the drop-in
quirks mode that is 'MicrosoftMode' given that it's only useful for
compatibility with the Microsoft headers/runtime.
llvm-svn: 198548
Cover a hypothetical case when we might not have reached the final argument
declaration for some reason during recovery, and split out for readability.
llvm-svn: 198542
instructions. I needed this for a quick experiment I was making, and
while I've no idea if that will ever get committed, I didn't want to
throw away the pattern match code and for anyone else to have to write
it again. I've added unittests to make sure this works correctly.
In fun news, this also uncovered the IRBuilder bug. Doh!
llvm-svn: 198541
void knrNoSemi(i) int i { }
Adherents of The C Programming Language unfortunate enough to miss a semicolon
as above would be met with a cascade of errors spanning the remainder of the
TU.
This patch introduces a beautiful parse error recovery, complete with helpful
FixIt to restore sanity.
Before (output redacted for brevity):
error: 'error' diagnostics seen but not expected:
File declarators.c Line 119: declaration does not declare a parameter
File declarators.c Line 123: declaration does not declare a parameter
File declarators.c Line 127: parameter named 'func_E12' is missing
File declarators.c Line 127: expected ';' at end of declaration
File declarators.c Line 133: parameter named 'func_E13' is missing
File declarators.c Line 133: expected ';' at end of declaration
File declarators.c Line 139: parameter named 'func_E14' is missing
File declarators.c Line 139: expected ';' at end of declaration
File declarators.c Line 145: parameter named 'func_E15' is missing
File declarators.c Line 145: expected ';' at end of declaration
File declarators.c Line 150: expected function body after function declarator
File declarators.c Line 119: declaration of 'enum E11' will not be visible outside of this function
File declarators.c Line 123: declaration of 'enum E12' will not be visible outside of this function
File declarators.c Line 133: ISO C forbids forward references to 'enum' types
File declarators.c Line 133: declaration of 'enum E13' will not be visible outside of this function
File declarators.c Line 139: ISO C forbids forward references to 'enum' types
File declarators.c Line 139: declaration of 'enum E14' will not be visible outside of this function
File declarators.c Line 145: ISO C forbids forward references to 'enum' types
File declarators.c Line 145: declaration of 'enum E15' will not be visible outside of this function
...
After:
declarators.c:103:24: error: expected ';' at end of declaration
void knrNoSemi(i) int i { }
^
;
Patch found in a sealed envelope dated 1978 with the message "Do not open until
January 2014"
llvm-svn: 198540
failed to correctly propagate the NUW and NSW flags to the constant
folder for two instructions. I've added a unittest to cover flag
propagation for the rest of the instructions and constant expressions.
llvm-svn: 198538
Venkatraman Govindaraju