I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
llvm-svn: 304787
Assembler directives .dtprelword, .dtpreldword, .tprelword, and
.tpreldword generates relocations R_MIPS_TLS_DTPREL32, R_MIPS_TLS_DTPREL64,
R_MIPS_TLS_TPREL32, and R_MIPS_TLS_TPREL64 respectively.
The main motivation for this patch is to be able to write test cases
for checking correctness of the LLD linker's behaviour.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23669
llvm-svn: 279439
We'd disabled them on x86 because back in the early days some host tools
couldn't handle the new load commands. This no longer holds: anyone capable of
deploying Clang should be able to deploy its copies of ar/ranlib/etc.
rdar://25254790
llvm-svn: 267075
Summary:
Support for R_MIPS_NONE allows us to parse MIPS16's usage of .reloc.
R_MIPS_32 was included to be able to better test the directive.
Targets can add their relocations by overriding MCAsmBackend::getFixupKind().
Subscribers: grosbach, rafael, majnemer, dsanders, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13659
llvm-svn: 252888
The function hasReliableSymbolDifference had exactly one use in the MachO
writer. It is also only true for X86_64. In fact, the comments refers to
"Darwin x86_64" and everything else, so this makes the code match the
comment.
If this is to be abstracted again, it should be a property of
TargetObjectWriter, like useAggressiveSymbolFolding.
llvm-svn: 203605
The target backend can support data-in-code load commands even when
the assembler doesn't, or vice-versa. Allow targets to opt-in for
direct-to-object.
PR13973.
llvm-svn: 164974
Chandler Carruth