Allowed folding for "and/or" binops with non-constant operand if
arguments of select are 0/-1 values.
Normally this code with "and" opcode does not get to a DAG combiner
and simplified yet in the InstCombine. However AMDGPU produces it
during lowering and InstCombine has no chance to optimize it out.
In turn the same pattern with "or" opcode can reach DAG.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48301
llvm-svn: 335250
This option allows codegen (such as DAGCombine or MI scheduling) to use alias
analysis information, which can help with the codegen on in-order cpu's,
especially machine scheduling. Here I have done things the same way as AArch64,
adding a subtarget feature to enable this for specific cores, and enabled it for
the R52 where we have a schedule to make use of it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48074
llvm-svn: 335249
Summary:
When expanding the PseudoTail in expandFunctionCall() we were using X6
to save the return address. Since this is a tail call the return
address is not needed, this patch replaces it with X0 to be ignored.
This matches the behaviour listed in the ISA V2.2 document page 110.
tail offset -----> jalr x0, x6, offset
GCC exhibits the same behavior.
Reviewers: apazos, asb, mgrang
Reviewed By: asb
Subscribers: rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48343
llvm-svn: 335239
This should help in lowering the following four intrinsics:
_mm256_cvtepi32_epi8
_mm256_cvtepi64_epi16
_mm256_cvtepi64_epi8
_mm512_cvtepi64_epi8
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46957
llvm-svn: 335238
Summary: Pretty much everything we need is in llvm::TargetMachine.
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: llvm-commits, tschuett
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48428
llvm-svn: 335237
Summary:
For sample and gather ops, we can accurately determine the set of
vaddr-size instruction variants that are required. This reduces
the size of instruction tables by ~5%.
The number of machine instruction opcodes is reduced from 10002
to 9476.
Change-Id: Ie7fc65d3657b762c7816017fe70b2e9bec644a8a
Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec
Subscribers: kzhuravl, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, llvm-commits, t-tye
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48168
llvm-svn: 335232
Summary:
This also removes the need for atomic pseudo instructions, since
we select the correct encoding directly in SITargetLowering::lowerImage
for dimension-aware image intrinsics.
Mesa uses dimension-aware image intrinsics since
commit a9a7993441.
Change-Id: I7473d20009476a4ed6d919cae4e6dca9ff42e77a
Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec, mareko, tpr, b-sumner
Subscribers: kzhuravl, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, t-tye, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48167
llvm-svn: 335231
Summary:
Use the expanded features of the TableGen generic tables to avoid manually
adding the combinatorially exploded set of intrinsics. The
getAMDGPUImageDimIntrinsic lookup function is early-out,
i.e. non-AMDGPU intrinsics will never look at the underlying table.
Use a generic approach for getting the new intrinsic overload to keep the
code simple, and make the image dmask handling more generic:
- handle non-sampler image loads
- handle the case where the set of demanded elements is not a prefix
There is some overlap between this code and an optimization that happens
in the backend during code generation. They currently complement each other:
- only the codegen optimization can generate vec3 loads
- only the InstCombine optimization can handle D16
The InstCombine optimization also likely covers more cases since the
codegen optimization is fairly ad-hoc. Ideally, we'll remove the optimization
in codegen once the infrastructure for vec3 is in place (which will probably
take a long time).
Modify the test cases to use dimension-aware intrinsics. This makes it
easier to see that the test coverage for the new intrinsics is equivalent,
and the old style intrinsics will be removed in a follow-up commit anyway.
Change-Id: I4b91ea661413d13004956fe4ef7d13d41b8ce3ad
Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec, majnemer
Subscribers: kzhuravl, wdng, mgorny, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48165
llvm-svn: 335230
Summary:
Also explicitly port over some tests in llvm.amdgcn.image.* that were
missing. Some tests are removed because they no longer apply (i.e.
explicitly testing building an address vector via insertelement).
This is in preparation for the eventual removal of the old-style
intrinsics.
Some additional notes:
- constant-address-space-32bit.ll: change some GCN-NEXT to GCN because
the instruction schedule was subtly altered
- insert_vector_elt.ll: the old test didn't actually test anything,
because %tmp1 was not used; remove the load, because it doesn't work
(Because of the amdgpu_ps calling convention? In any case, it's
orthogonal to what the test claims to be testing.)
Change-Id: Idfa99b6512ad139e755e82b8b89548ab08f0afcf
Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec
Subscribers: MatzeB, qcolombet, kzhuravl, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48018
llvm-svn: 335229
Summary:
Having TableGen patterns for image intrinsics is hitting limitations:
for D16 we already have to manually pre-lower the packing of data
values, and we will have to do the same for A16 eventually.
Since there is already some custom C++ code anyway, it is arguably easier
to just do everything in C++, now that we can use the beefed-up generic
tables backend of TableGen to provide all the required metadata and map
intrinsics to corresponding opcodes. With this approach, all image
intrinsic lowering happens in SITargetLowering::lowerImage. That code is
dense due to all the cases that it handles, but it should still be easier
to follow than what we had before, by virtue of it all being done in a
single location, and by virtue of not relying on the TableGen pattern
magic that very few people really understand.
This means that we will have MachineSDNodes with MIMG instructions
during DAG combining, but that seems alright: previously we had
intrinsic nodes instead, but those are similarly opaque to the generic
CodeGen infrastructure, and the final pattern matching just did a 1:1
translation to machine instructions anyway. If anything, the fact that
we now merge the address words into a vector before DAG combine should
be an advantage.
Change-Id: I417f26bd88f54ce9781c1668acc01f3f99774de6
Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec, rtaylor, tstellar
Subscribers: kzhuravl, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48017
llvm-svn: 335228
Summary:
This allows us to access rich information about MIMG opcodes from C++ code.
Simplifying the mapping between equivalent opcodes of different data size
becomes quite natural.
This also flattens the MIMG-related class and multiclass hierarchy a little,
and collapses together some of the scaffolding for sample and gather4 opcodes.
Change-Id: I1a2549fdc1e881ff100e5393d2d87e73729a0ccd
Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec
Subscribers: kzhuravl, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48016
llvm-svn: 335227
Summary:
This is essentially a rewrite of the backend which introduces TableGen
base classes GenericEnum, GenericTable, and SearchIndex. They allow
generating custom enums and tables with lookup functions using
separately defined records as the underlying database.
Also added as part of this change:
- Lookup functions may use indices composed of multiple fields.
- Instruction fields are supported similar to Intrinsic fields.
- When the lookup key has contiguous numeric values, the lookup
function will directly index into the table instead of using a binary
search.
The existing SearchableTable functionality is internally mapped to the
new primitives.
Change-Id: I444f3490fa1dbfb262d7286a1660a2c4308e9932
Reviewers: arsenm, tra, t.p.northover
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48013
llvm-svn: 335225
Summary:
This will allows us to provide rich metadata about the instructions
in tables that are accessible by custom C++ code.
Change-Id: Id9305a26304ab6a6cceb6c65c8cd49141cc0101d
Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec
Subscribers: kzhuravl, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48011
llvm-svn: 335224
Summary:
Kill instructions sometimes do use SCC in unusual circumstances, when
v_cmpx cannot be used due to the operands that are involved.
Additionally, even if SCC was never defined by the expansion, kill pseudos
could previously occur between an s_cmp and an s_cbranch_scc, which breaks
the SCC liveness tracking when the pseudo is expanded to split the basic
block. While it would be possible to explicitly mark the SCC as live-in for
the successor basic block, it's simpler to just mark the pseudo as using SCC,
so that such a sequence is never emitted by instruction selection in the
first place.
A similar issue affects indirect source/dest pseudos in principle, although
I haven't been able to come up with a test case where it actually matters
(this affects instruction selection, so a MIR test can't be used).
Fixes: dEQP-GLES3.functional.shaders.discard.dynamic_loop_always
Change-Id: Ica8d82ecff1a763b892a1112cf1b06c948863a4f
Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec
Subscribers: kzhuravl, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47761
llvm-svn: 335223
Summary:
This allows us to reduce the number of different machine instruction
opcodes, which reduces the table sizes and helps flatten the TableGen
multiclass hierarchies.
We can do this because for each hardware MIMG opcode, we have a full set
of IMAGE_xxx_Vn_Vm machine instructions for all required sizes of vdata
and vaddr registers. Instead of having separate D16 machine instructions,
a packed D16 instructions loading e.g. 4 components can simply use the
same V2 opcode variant that non-D16 instructions use.
We still require a TSFlag for D16 buffer instructions, because the
D16-ness of buffer instructions is part of the opcode. Renaming the flag
should help avoid future confusion.
The one non-obvious code change is that for gather4 instructions, the
disassembler can no longer automatically decide whether to use a V2 or
a V4 variant. The existing logic which choose the correct variant for
other MIMG instruction is extended to cover gather4 as well.
As a bonus, some of the assembler error messages are now more helpful
(e.g., complaining about a wrong data size instead of a non-existing
instruction).
While we're at it, delete a whole bunch of dead legacy TableGen code.
Change-Id: I89b02c2841c06f95e662541433e597f5d4553978
Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec, kzhuravl, artem.tamazov, dp, rtaylor
Subscribers: wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47434
llvm-svn: 335222
Summary:
This also allows inner foreach loops to have a list that depends on
the iteration variable of an outer foreach loop. The test cases show
some very simple examples of how this can be used.
This was perhaps the last remaining major non-orthogonality in the
TableGen frontend.
Change-Id: I79b92d41a5c0e7c03cc8af4000c5e1bda5ef464d
Reviewers: tra, simon_tatham, craig.topper, MartinO, arsenm
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47431
llvm-svn: 335221
This enables da-delinearize in Dependence Analysis for delinearizing array
accesses into multiple dimensions. This can help to increase the power of
Dependence analysis on multi-dimensional arrays and prevent having to fall
back to the slower and less accurate MIV tests. It adds static checks on the
bounds of the arrays to ensure that one dimension doesn't overflow into
another, and brings our code in line with our tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45872
llvm-svn: 335217
These were being over cautious for costs for one/two op general shuffles - VSHUFPD doesn't have to replicate the same shuffle in both lanes like VSHUFPS does.
llvm-svn: 335216
Summary:
In some cases, these operands lacked the IsDebug property, which is meant to signal that
they should not affect codegen. This patch adds a check for this property in the
MachineVerifier and adds it where it was missing.
This includes refactorings to use MachineInstrBuilder construction functions instead of
manually setting up the intrinsic everywhere.
Patch by: JesperAntonsson
Reviewers: aprantl, rnk, echristo, javed.absar
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: qcolombet, sdardis, nemanjai, JDevlieghere, atanasyan, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48319
llvm-svn: 335214
The alignment parameter to getExtLoad is treated as a base alignment,
not the alignment of the load (base + offset). When we infer a better
alignment for a Ptr we need to ensure that it applies to the base to
prevent the alignment on the load from being wrong.
This fixes a bug where the alignment could then be used to incorrectly
prove noalias between a load and a store, leading to a miscompile.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48029
llvm-svn: 335210
r335150 should resolve the issues with the clang-with-thin-lto-ubuntu
and clang-with-lto-ubuntu builders.
Original message:
This patch updates IPSCCP to use PredicateInfo to propagate
facts to true branches predicated by EQ and to false branches
predicated by NE.
As a follow up, we should be able to extend it to also propagate additional
facts about nonnull.
Reviewers: davide, mssimpso, dberlin, efriedma
Reviewed By: davide, dberlin
llvm-svn: 335206
Summary:
Fixes PR36579.
For cases where we had e.g.
DBG_VALUE 42
[...]
DBG_VALUE undef
LiveDebugVariables would discard all undef DBG_VALUEs and then it would
look like the variable had the value 42 throughout the rest of the
function, which is incorrect.
With this patch we don't remove all undef DBG_VALUEs in LiveDebugVariables
so they will be kept after register allocation just like other DBG_VALUEs
which will yield more correct debug information.
Reviewers: aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: bjope, Ka-Ka, JDevlieghere, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48277
llvm-svn: 335205
conditions feeding a chain of `and`s or `or`s for a branch.
Much like with full non-trivial unswitching, we rely on the pass manager
to handle iterating until all of the profitable unswitches have been
done. This is to allow other more profitable unswitches to fire on any
of the cloned, simpler versions of the loop if viable.
Threading the partial unswiching through the non-trivial unswitching
logic motivated some minor refactorings. If those are too disruptive to
make it reasonable to review this patch, I can separate them out, but
it'll be somewhat timeconsuming so I wanted to send it for initial
review as-is. Feel free to tell me whether it warrants pulling apart.
I've tried to re-use (and factor out) logic form the partial trivial
unswitching, but not as much could be shared as I had haped. Still, this
wasn't as bad as I naively expected.
Some basic testing is added, but I probably need more. Suggestions for
things you'd like to see tested more than welcome. One thing I'd like to
do is add some testing that when we schedule this with loop-instsimplify
it effectively cleans up the cruft created.
Last but not least, this uncovered a bug that has been in loop cloning
the entire time for non-trivial unswitching. Specifically, we didn't
correctly add the outer-most cloned loop to the list of cloned loops.
This meant that LCSSA wouldn't be updated for it hypothetically, and
more significantly that we would never visit it in the loop pass
manager. I noticed this while checking loop-instsimplify by hand. I'll
try to separate this bugfix out into its own patch with a more focused
test. But it is just one line, so shouldn't significantly confuse the
review here.
After this patch, the only missing "feature" in this unswitch I'm aware
of us non-trivial unswitching of switches. I'll try implementing *full*
non-trivial unswitching of switches (which is at least a sound thing to
implement), but *partial* non-trivial unswitching of switches is
something I don't see any sound and principled way to implement. I also
have no interesting test cases for the latter, so I'm not really
worried. The rest of the things that need to be ported are bug-fixes and
more narrow / targeted support for specific issues.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47522
llvm-svn: 335203
Summary:
Since the value stored in the cache might be deleted or replaced with
something else, we need to use tracking ValueHandlers instead of plain
Value pointers. It was discovered in one of internal builds, and
unfortunately there is no small reproducer for the issue.
The cache was introduced in rL327328.
Reviewers: ahatanak, pete
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48407
llvm-svn: 335201
Summary:
Try to match udiv and urem patterns, and sink zext down to the leaves.
I'm not entirely sure why some unrelated tests change, but the added <nsw>s seem right.
Reviewers: sanjoy
Subscribers: jlebar, hiraditya, bixia, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48338
llvm-svn: 335197
Errors found processing the DW_AT_ranges attribute are propagated by lower level
routines and reported by their callers.
Reviewer: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48344
llvm-svn: 335188
These are identical but use microMIPS instructions instead of MIPS instructions.
Also, flatten the 'let AdditionalPredicates = [InMicroMips]' by using the
ISA_MICROMIPS adjective. Add tests for constant materialization.
Reviewers: atanasyan, abeserminji, smaksimovic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48275
llvm-svn: 335185
Summary:
Two utils methods have essentially the same functionality. This is an attempt to merge them into one.
1. lib/Transforms/Utils/Local.cpp : MergeBasicBlockIntoOnlyPred
2. lib/Transforms/Utils/BasicBlockUtils.cpp : MergeBlockIntoPredecessor
Prior to the patch:
1. MergeBasicBlockIntoOnlyPred
Updates either DomTree or DeferredDominance
Moves all instructions from Pred to BB, deletes Pred
Asserts BB has single predecessor
If address was taken, replace the block address with constant 1 (?)
2. MergeBlockIntoPredecessor
Updates DomTree, LoopInfo and MemoryDependenceResults
Moves all instruction from BB to Pred, deletes BB
Returns if doesn't have a single predecessor
Returns if BB's address was taken
After the patch:
Method 2. MergeBlockIntoPredecessor is attempting to become the new default:
Updates DomTree or DeferredDominance, and LoopInfo and MemoryDependenceResults
Moves all instruction from BB to Pred, deletes BB
Returns if doesn't have a single predecessor
Returns if BB's address was taken
Uses of MergeBasicBlockIntoOnlyPred that need to be replaced:
1. lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopSimplifyCFG.cpp
Updated in this patch. No challenges.
2. lib/CodeGen/CodeGenPrepare.cpp
Updated in this patch.
i. eliminateFallThrough is straightforward, but I added using a temporary array to avoid the iterator invalidation.
ii. eliminateMostlyEmptyBlock(s) methods also now use a temporary array for blocks
Some interesting aspects:
- Since Pred is not deleted (BB is), the entry block does not need updating.
- The entry block was being updated with the deleted block in eliminateMostlyEmptyBlock. Added assert to make obvious that BB=SinglePred.
- isMergingEmptyBlockProfitable assumes BB is the one to be deleted.
- eliminateMostlyEmptyBlock(BB) does not delete BB on one path, it deletes its unique predecessor instead.
- adding some test owner as subscribers for the interesting tests modified:
test/CodeGen/X86/avx-cmp.ll
test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/nested-loop-conditions.ll
test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/si-annotate-cf.ll
test/CodeGen/X86/hoist-spill.ll
test/CodeGen/X86/2006-11-17-IllegalMove.ll
3. lib/Transforms/Scalar/JumpThreading.cpp
Not covered in this patch. It is the only use case using the DeferredDominance.
I would defer to Brian Rzycki to make this replacement.
Reviewers: chandlerc, spatel, davide, brzycki, bkramer, javed.absar
Subscribers: qcolombet, sanjoy, nemanjai, nhaehnle, jlebar, tpr, kbarton, RKSimon, wmi, arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48202
llvm-svn: 335183
Summary:
Ideally passes should not need to pass MSSA around and do all updates through the updater.
Add convenience APIs to help with that.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: sanjoy, jlebar, llvm-commits, Prazek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48334
llvm-svn: 335179
This fixes an extremely subtle non-determinism that can only be
triggered by an unfortunate alignment of passes. In my case:
- JumpThreading does large dominator tree updates
- CorrelatedValuePropagation preserves domtree now
- LICM codegen depends on the order of children on domtree nodes
The last part is non-deterministic if the update was stored in a set.
But it turns out that the set is completely unnecessary, updates are
deduplicated at an earlier stage so we can just use a vector, which is
both more efficient and doesn't destroy the input ordering.
I didn't manage to get the 240 MB IR file reduced enough, triggering
this bug requires a lot of jump threading, so landing this without a
test case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48392
llvm-svn: 335176
Summary: Make the MemorySSA verify also check that all Phi incoming blocks are block predecessors.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: sanjoy, jlebar, Prazek, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48333
llvm-svn: 335174
I don't believe there is any real reason to have separate X86 specific opcodes for vector compares. Setcc has the same behavior just uses a different encoding for the condition code.
I had to change the CondCodeAction for SETLT and SETLE to prevent some transforms from changing SETGT lowering.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43608
llvm-svn: 335173
As described in D48359, this patch pushes InstructionsState down the BoUpSLP call hierarchy instead of the corresponding raw OpValue. This makes it easier to track the alternate opcode etc. and avoids us having to call getAltOpcode which makes it difficult to support more than one alternate opcode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48382
llvm-svn: 335170
Previously this folding was done only if select is a first operand.
However, for non-commutative operations constant may go before
select.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48223
llvm-svn: 335167
The idea of partial unswitching is to take a *part* of a branch's
condition that is loop invariant and just unswitching that part. This
primarily makes sense with i1 conditions of branches as opposed to
switches. When dealing with i1 conditions, we can easily extract loop
invariant inputs to a a branch and unswitch them to test them entirely
outside the loop.
As part of this, we now create much more significant cruft in the loop
body, so this relies on adding cleanup passes to the loop pipeline and
revisiting unswitched loops to do that cleanup before continuing to
process them.
This already appears to be more powerful at unswitching than the old
loop unswitch pass, and so I'd appreciate pretty careful review in case
I'm just missing some correctness checks. The `LIV-loop-condition` test
case is not unswitched by the old unswitch pass, but is with this pass.
Thanks to Sanjoy and Fedor for the review!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46706
llvm-svn: 335156
These instructions were renamed in version 2.2 of the user-level ISA spec, but
the old name should also be accepted by standard tools.
llvm-svn: 335154
The outliner emits debug info. Add a test that outlines a function
and uses llvm-dwarfdump to check the emitted DWARF for correctness.
llvm-svn: 335153
This utility should operate on Values, not Instructions. While I'm here,
I've also made it possible to skip emitting replacement dbg.values for
certain debug users (by having RewriteExpr return nullptr).
llvm-svn: 335152
Using OrderedInstructions::dominates as comparator for instructions in
BBs without dominance relation can cause a non-deterministic order
between such instructions. That in turn can cause us to materialize
copies in a non-deterministic order. While this does not effect
correctness, it causes some minor non-determinism in the final generated
code, because values have slightly different labels.
Without this patch, running -print-predicateinfo on a reasonably large
module produces slightly different output on each run.
This patch uses the dominator trees DFSInNum to order instruction from
different BBs, which should enforce a deterministic ordering and
guarantee that dominated instructions come after the instructions that
dominate them.
Reviewers: dberlin, efriedma, davide
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48230
llvm-svn: 335150
Summary:
Due to uniqueing of DICompositeTypes, it's possible for a type from one
module to be loaded into another earlier module without being renamed.
Then when the defining module is being IRMoved, the type can be used as
a Mapping destination before being loaded, such that when it's requested
using TypeMapTy::get() it will fail with an assertion that the type is a
source type when it's actually a type in both the source and
destination modules. Correctly handle that case by allowing a non-opaque
non-literal struct type be present in both modules.
Fix for PR37684.
Reviewers: pcc, tejohnson
Reviewed By: pcc, tejohnson
Subscribers: tobiasvk, mehdi_amini, steven_wu, llvm-commits, kcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47898
llvm-svn: 335145
The purpose of this utility is to make it easier for optimizations to
insert replacement dbg.values for instructions they are deleting. This
is useful in situations where salvageDebugInfo is inapplicable, say,
because the new dbg.value cannot refer to an operand of the dying value.
The utility is called insertReplacementDbgValues.
It assumes that the instruction 'From' is going to be deleted, and
inserts replacement dbg.values for each debug user of 'From'. The
newly-inserted dbg.values refer to 'To' instead of 'From'. Each
replacement dbg.value has the same location and variable as the debug
user it replaces, has a DIExpression determined by the result of
'RewriteExpr' applied to an old debug user of 'From', and is placed
before 'InsertBefore'.
This should simplify future patches, like D48331.
llvm-svn: 335144
Summary:
Found some regressions (infinite loop in DAGTypeLegalizer::RemapId)
after r334880. This patch makes sure that we do map a TableId to
itself.
Reviewers: niravd
Reviewed By: niravd
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48364
llvm-svn: 335141
Summary:
The waterfall no longer builds .s files and no longers uses
the wasm-o when it builds object files.
Subscribers: dschuff, jgravelle-google, aheejin, sunfish, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48371
llvm-svn: 335135
This is part of a move towards generalizing the alternate opcode mechanism and not just supporting (F)Add/(F)Sub counterparts.
The patch embeds the AltOpcode in the InstructionsState instead of calling getAltOpcode so often.
I'm hoping to eventually remove all uses of getAltOpcode and handle alternate opcode selection entirely within getSameOpcode, that will require us to use InstructionsState throughout the BoUpSLP call hierarchy (similar to some of the changes in D28907), which I will begin in future patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48359
llvm-svn: 335134
D47985 saw the old SK_Alternate 'alternating' shuffle mask replaced with the SK_Select mask which accepts either input operand for each lane, equivalent to a vector select with a constant condition operand.
This patch updates SLPVectorizer to make full use of this SK_Select shuffle pattern by removing the 'isOdd()' limitation.
The AArch64 regression will be fixed by D48172.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48174
llvm-svn: 335130
For both operands are unsigned, the following optimizations are valid, and missing:
1. X > Y && X != 0 --> X > Y
2. X > Y || X != 0 --> X != 0
3. X <= Y || X != 0 --> true
4. X <= Y || X == 0 --> X <= Y
5. X > Y && X == 0 --> false
unsigned foo(unsigned x, unsigned y) { return x > y && x != 0; }
should fold to x > y, but I found we haven't done it right now.
besides, unsigned foo(unsigned x, unsigned y) { return x < y && y != 0; }
Has been folded to x < y, so there may be a bug.
Patch by: Li Jia He!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47922
llvm-svn: 335129
These are the baseline tests for the functional change in D47922.
Patch by Li Jia He!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48000
llvm-svn: 335128
These are produced by GCC and supported by GAS, but not currently contained in
the pseudoinstruction listing in the RISC-V ISA manual.
llvm-svn: 335127
Summary:
This is useful when hash collisions are unlikely and acceptable, e.g. in clangd
completion ranking.
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48361
llvm-svn: 335125
These are produced by GCC and supported by GAS, but not currently contained in
the pseudoinstruction listing in the RISC-V ISA manual.
llvm-svn: 335120
Thumb has more 16-bit encoding space dedicated to ADD than ORR, allowing both a
3-address encoding and a wider range of immediates. So, particularly when
optimizing for code size (but it doesn't make things worse elsewhere) it's
beneficial to select an OR operation to an ADD if we know overflow won't occur.
This is made even better by LLVM's penchant for putting operations in canonical
form by converting the other way.
llvm-svn: 335119
This patch teaches llvm-mca how to identify register writes that implicitly zero
the upper portion of a super-register.
On X86-64, a general purpose register is implemented in hardware as a 64-bit
register. Quoting the Intel 64 Software Developer's Manual: "an update to the
lower 32 bits of a 64 bit integer register is architecturally defined to zero
extend the upper 32 bits". Also, a write to an XMM register performed by an AVX
instruction implicitly zeroes the upper 128 bits of the aliasing YMM register.
This patch adds a new method named clearsSuperRegisters to the MCInstrAnalysis
interface to help identify instructions that implicitly clear the upper portion
of a super-register. The rest of the patch teaches llvm-mca how to use that new
method to obtain the information, and update the register dependencies
accordingly.
I compared the kernels from tests clear-super-register-1.s and
clear-super-register-2.s against the output from perf on btver2. Previously
there was a large discrepancy between the estimated IPC and the measured IPC.
Now the differences are mostly in the noise.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48225
llvm-svn: 335113
This fixes compilation with MinGW after SVN r333798, which added
a few functions within _WIN32 ifdefs, functions returning
std::error_code. Include everything that is needed instead of
hoping that this header being inclued transitively (which it apparently
is in MSVC builds).
llvm-svn: 335107
Summary: Introducing a Prototype object to capture Variables that must be set but keeps degrees of freedom as Invalid. This allows exploring non constraint variables later on.
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48316
llvm-svn: 335105
Summary:
Related to https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37793, https://reviews.llvm.org/D46760#1127287
We'd like to do this canonicalization https://rise4fun.com/Alive/Gmc
But it is currently restricted by rL155136 / rL155362, which says:
```
// This is a constant shift of a constant shift. Be careful about hiding
// shl instructions behind bit masks. They are used to represent multiplies
// by a constant, and it is important that simple arithmetic expressions
// are still recognizable by scalar evolution.
//
// The transforms applied to shl are very similar to the transforms applied
// to mul by constant. We can be more aggressive about optimizing right
// shifts.
//
// Combinations of right and left shifts will still be optimized in
// DAGCombine where scalar evolution no longer applies.
```
I think these tests show that for *constants*, SCEV has no issues with that canonicalization.
Reviewers: mkazantsev, spatel, efriedma, sanjoy
Reviewed By: mkazantsev
Subscribers: sanjoy, javed.absar, llvm-commits, stoklund, bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48229
llvm-svn: 335101
Summary:
First off: i do not have any access to that processor,
so this is purely theoretical, no benchmarks.
I have been looking into b**d**ver2 scheduling profile, and while cross-referencing
the existing b**t**ver2, znver1 profiles, and the reference docs
(`Software Optimization Guide for AMD Family {15,16,17}h Processors`),
i have noticed that only b**t**ver2 scheduling profile specifies these.
Also, there is no mca test coverage.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, courbet, GGanesh, andreadb
Reviewed By: GGanesh
Subscribers: gbedwell, vprasad, ddibyend, shivaram, Ashutosh, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47676
llvm-svn: 335099
Summary:
I ran llvm-exegesis on SKX, SKL, BDW, HSW, SNB.
Atom is from Agner and SLM is a guess.
I've left AMD processors alone.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48079
llvm-svn: 335097
Stanislav Mekhanoshin