Store this info inside the function summary generated for all analyzed
functions. This is useful for coverage stats and can be helpful for
analyzer state space search strategies.
llvm-svn: 153923
property file/line rather than the @synthesize file/line. Avoids
some nasty confusing-ness with conflating the file from the scope
and the line from the original declaration. Use the current scope
location as a separate parameter so that we can match it up
better in the line table with the beginning of the scope.
Update a couple of testcases accordingly since I had to change
that we actually use the passed in location in EmitFunctionStart
and for the new metadata parameter and add a new testcase to
make sure we've got the right line numbers for synthesized
properties.
Part of rdar://11026482
llvm-svn: 153917
brace) so that we get more accurate line number information about the
declaration of a given function and the line where the function
first starts.
Part of rdar://11026482
llvm-svn: 153916
properly reason about such accesses, but we shouldn't emit bogus "uninitialized value" warnings
either. Fixes <rdar://problem/11127008>.
llvm-svn: 153913
Fixed an issue where there were more than one way to get a CompileUnitSP created when using SymbolFileDWARF with SymbolFileDWARFDebugMap. This led to an assertion that would fire under certain conditions. Now there is only one way to create the compile unit and it will "do the right thing".
llvm-svn: 153908
This patch allows llvm to recognize that a 64 bit object file is being produced
and that the subsequently generated ELF header has the correct information.
The test case checks for both big and little endian flavors.
Patch by Jack Carter.
llvm-svn: 153889
The diagnostic message correctly informs the user that they have omitted the
'class' keyword, but neither suggests this insertion as a fixit, nor attempts
to recover as if they had provided the keyword.
This fixes the recovery, adds the fixit, and adds a separate diagnostic and
corresponding replacement fixit for cases where the user wrote 'struct' or
'typename' instead of 'class' (suggested by Richard Smith as a possible common
mistake).
I'm not sure the diagnostic message for either the original or new cases feel
very Clang-esque, so I'm open to suggestions there. The fixit hints make it
fairly easy to see what's required, though.
llvm-svn: 153887
move constructor/move assignment operator are not declared, rather than being
defined as deleted, so move operations on the derived class fall back to
copying rather than moving.
If a move operation on the derived class is explicitly defaulted, the
unmovable subobject will be copied instead of being moved.
llvm-svn: 153883
Bill Wendling