For "int i = NULL;" we would produce:
null.cpp:5:11: warning: implicit conversion of NULL constant to integer [-Wconversion]
int i = NULL;
~ ^~~~
null.cpp:1:14: note: expanded from macro 'NULL'
\#define NULL __null
^~~~~~
But we really shouldn't trace that macro expansion back into the header, yet we
still want macro back traces for code like this:
\#define FOO NULL
int i = FOO;
or
\#define FOO int i = NULL;
FOO
While providing appropriate tagging at different levels of the expansion, etc.
The included test case exercises these cases & does some basic validation (to
ensure we don't have macro expansion notes where we shouldn't, and do where we
should) - but doesn't go as far as to validate the source location/ranges
used in those notes and warnings.
llvm-svn: 152940
Original commit message:
Provide -Wnull-conversion separately from -Wconversion.
Like GCC, provide a NULL conversion to non-pointer conversion as a separate
flag, on by default. GCC's flag is "conversion-null" which we provide for
cross compatibility, but in the interests of consistency (with
-Wint-conversion, -Wbool-conversion, etc) the canonical Clang flag is called
-Wnull-conversion.
Patch by Lubos Lunak.
Review feedback by myself, Chandler Carruth, and Chad Rosier.
llvm-svn: 152774
Like GCC, provide a NULL conversion to non-pointer conversion as a separate
flag, on by default. GCC's flag is "conversion-null" which we provide for
cross compatibility, but in the interests of consistency (with
-Wint-conversion, -Wbool-conversion, etc) the canonical Clang flag is called
-Wnull-conversion.
Patch by Lubos Lunak.
Review feedback by myself, Chandler Carruth, and Chad Rosier.
llvm-svn: 152745
David Blaikie