There was enough consensus that we *can* get a good language solution
to have an annotation outside of C++11, and without this annotation
this warning doesn't quite mean's completeness criteria for this
kind of warning. For now, restrict this warning to C++11 (where an
annotation exists), and make this the behavior for the LLVM 3.2 release.
Afterwards, we will hammer out a language solution that we are all
happy with.
llvm-svn: 167749
The 'a', 'c', and 'd' constraints on i386 mean a 32-bit register. We cannot
place a 64-bit value into the 32-bit register. Error out instead of causing the
compiler to spew general badness.
<rdar://problem/12415959>
llvm-svn: 167717
attributes. In cases where the merged declaration is fully equivalent to the
two original ones, some of the code was getLVForDecl was duplicated.
Cases that are still handled in getLVForDecl are things like
__private_extern__ int N;
int N;
For which we cannot produce a single merged decl with all the information.
llvm-svn: 167703
When recursively visiting the generated matches, the aggregated bindings need
to be copied during the recursion. Otherwise, we they might not be properly
overwritten (which is shown by the test), or there might be bound nodes present
that were bound on a different matching branch.
Review: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D112
llvm-svn: 167695
- New options '-mrtm'/'-mno-rtm' are added to enable/disable RTM feature
- Builtin macro '__RTM__' is defined if RTM feature is enabled
- RTM intrinsic header is added and introduces 3 new intrinsics, namely
'_xbegin', '_xend', and '_xabort'.
- 3 new builtins are added to keep compatible with gcc, namely
'__builtin_ia32_xbegin', '__builtin_ia32_xend', and '__builtin_ia32_xabort'.
- Test cases for pre-defined macro and new intrinsic codegen are added.
llvm-svn: 167665
The rationale is that there is no good workflow to silence the warning
for specific cases, other than using pragmas. This is because the
attribute to decorate an explicit fall through is only available
in C++11.
By that argument, this should probably also be disabled unless one
is using C++11, but apparently there is an explicit test case for
this warning when using C++98. This will require further discussion
on cfe-commits.
Fixes: <rdar://problem/12584746>
llvm-svn: 167655
Previously, RegionStore was being VERY conservative in saying that because
p[i].x and p[i].y have a concrete base region of 'p', they might overlap.
Now, we check the chain of fields back up to the base object and check if
they match.
This only kicks in when dealing with symbolic offset regions because
RegionStore's "base+offset" representation of concrete offset regions loses
all information about fields. In cases where all offsets are concrete
(s.x and s.y), RegionStore will already do the right thing, but mixing
concrete and symbolic offsets can cause bindings to be invalidated that
are known to not overlap (e.g. p[0].x and p[i].y).
This additional refinement is tracked by <rdar://problem/12676180>.
<rdar://problem/12530149>
llvm-svn: 167654
would have diagnosed this at instantiation time anyway, if only we
didn't hang on all of these test cases. Fixes <rdar://problem/12629723>
llvm-svn: 167651
C++11 3.3.3/2 "A parameter name shall not be redeclared in the outermost block
of the function definition nor in the outermost block of any handler associated
with a function-try-block."
It's not totally clear to me whether the "FIXME" case is covered by this, but
Richard Smith thinks it probably should be. It's just a bit more involved to
fix that case.
llvm-svn: 167650
This warning was failing to fire under ARC because of the implicit
lifetime casts added around the object literal expression.
<rdar://problem/11300873>, again.
llvm-svn: 167648
is empty in a variadic macro expansion. This fixes a divergence in support for
the ", ## __VA_ARGS__" GCC extension which differed in behaviour when in strict
C99 mode (note: there is no change in behaviour has been made in the gnu99 mode
that clang uses by default). In addition, there is improved support for the
Microsoft alternative extension ", __VA_ARGS__".
llvm-svn: 167613
I couldn't think of a way to make an operator() invalid without returning
earlier from this function other than making it static, so no new test.
llvm-svn: 167609
Chad Rosier