Summary:
This never really got implemented, and was very hard to test before
a lot of the refactoring changes to make things more robust. But now we
can test it thoroughly and cleanly, especially at the CGSCC level.
The core idea is that when an inner analysis manager proxy receives the
invalidation event for the outer IR unit, it needs to walk the inner IR
units and propagate it to the inner analysis manager for each of those
units. For example, each function in the SCC needs to get an
invalidation event when the SCC gets one.
The function / module interaction is somewhat boring here. This really
becomes interesting in the face of analysis-backed IR units. This patch
effectively handles all of the CGSCC layer's needs -- both invalidating
SCC analysis and invalidating function analysis when an SCC gets
invalidated.
However, this second aspect doesn't really handle the
LoopAnalysisManager well at this point. That one will need some change
of design in order to fully integrate, because unlike the call graph,
the entire function behind a LoopAnalysis's results can vanish out from
under us, and we won't even have a cached API to access. I'd like to try
to separate solving the loop problems into a subsequent patch though in
order to keep this more focused so I've adapted them to the API and
updated the tests that immediately fail, but I've not added the level of
testing and validation at that layer that I have at the CGSCC layer.
An important aspect of this change is that the proxy for the
FunctionAnalysisManager at the SCC pass layer doesn't work like the
other proxies for an inner IR unit as it doesn't directly manage the
FunctionAnalysisManager and invalidation or clearing of it. This would
create an ever worsening problem of dual ownership of this
responsibility, split between the module-level FAM proxy and this
SCC-level FAM proxy. Instead, this patch changes the SCC-level FAM proxy
to work in terms of the module-level proxy and defer to it to handle
much of the updates. It only does SCC-specific invalidation. This will
become more important in subsequent patches that support more complex
invalidaiton scenarios.
Reviewers: jlebar
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, mcrosier, mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27197
llvm-svn: 289317
Ideally ISD::FP_TO_SINT and ISD::FP_TO_UINT would only be used for cases with the same number of input and output elements.
Similar things have already been done for other convert intrinsics.
llvm-svn: 289316
These should've been checking whether the immediate is a 6-bit unsigned
integer.
If the immediate was '63', this would cause an assertion error which
shouldn't have occurred.
llvm-svn: 289315
The VirtualCallChecker is in alpha because its interprocedural diagnostics
represent the call path textually in the diagnostic message rather than with a
path sensitive diagnostic.
This patch turns off the AST-based interprocedural analysis in the checker so
that no call path is needed and improves with diagnostic text. With these
changes, the checker is ready to be moved into the optin package.
Ultimately the right fix is to rewrite this checker to be path sensitive -- but
there is still value in enabling the checker for intraprocedural analysis only
The interprocedural mode can be re-enabled with an -analyzer-config flag.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26768
llvm-svn: 289309
The entries in vim.current.buffer appear to be decoded strings, which
means that python3 won't allow invoking 'decode' on them. Keep the old
behavior when running under python2, but skip the error-inducing decode
step with python3..
llvm-svn: 289308
Since 32-bit instructions with 32-bit input immediate behavior
are used to materialize 16-bit constants in 32-bit registers
for 16-bit instructions, determining the legality based
on the size is incorrect. Change operands to have the size
specified in the type.
Also adds a workaround for a disassembler bug that
produces an immediate MCOperand for an operand that
is supposed to be OPERAND_REGISTER.
The assembler appears to accept out of bounds immediates and
truncates them, but this seems to be an issue for 32-bit
already.
llvm-svn: 289306
On some Apple platforms, the ObjC BOOL type is defined as a signed char.
When performing instrumentation for -fsanitize=bool, we'd like to treat
the range of BOOL like it's always {0, 1}. While we can't change clang's
IRGen for char-backed BOOL's due to ABI compatibility concerns, we can
teach ubsan to catch potential abuses of this type.
rdar://problem/29502773
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27607
llvm-svn: 289290
This allows us to negate preceding --cuda-gpu-arch=X.
This comes handy when user needs to override default
flags set for them by the build system.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27631
llvm-svn: 289287
We first decide that the symbol is global, than that it should have
version foo. Since it was already not the default version, we were
producing a bogus warning.
llvm-svn: 289284
This ports the ELF linker's symbol table design, introduced in r268178,
to the COFF linker.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21166
llvm-svn: 289280
Summary:
The Swift frontend is acquiring the ability to load non-module PCH files containing
bridging definitions from C/ObjC. As part of this work, it needs to know which submodules
were imported by a PCH in order to wrap them in local Swift modules. This information
is collected by ASTReader::ReadAST in a local vector, but is currently kept private.
The change here is just to make the type of the vector elements public, and provide
an optional out-parameter to the ReadAST method to provide the vector's contents to
a caller after a successful read.
Reviewers: manmanren, rsmith, doug.gregor
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27580
llvm-svn: 289276
The code pattern used to implement the token rewriting hack doesn't
interact well with token caching in the pre-processor. As a result,
clang would crash on 'int f(::(id));' while doing a tenative parse of
the contents of the outer parentheses. The original code from PR11852
still doesn't crash the compiler.
This error recovery also often does the wrong thing with member function
pointers. The test case from the original PR doesn't recover the right
way either:
void S::(*pf)() = S::f; // should be 'void (S::*pf)()'
Instead we were recovering as 'void S::*pf()', which is still wrong.
If we still think that users mistakenly parenthesize identifiers in
nested name specifiers, we should change clang to intentionally parse
that form with an error, rather than doing a token rewrite.
Fixes PR26623, but I think there will be many more bugs like this around
token rewriting in the parser.
Reviewers: rsmith, rtrieu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25882
llvm-svn: 289273
The former option bases the filename on the output name, e.g. if the
link output is a.exe, the map will be written to a.map. This matches the
behaviour of link.exe's /MAP option and is useful for creating a map
file of each executable when building a large project.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27595
llvm-svn: 289271
Profiling revealed that we were spending 5% of our time linking
chrome_child.dll just in this call to toString().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27628
llvm-svn: 289270
LLVM's use of DW_OP_bit_piece is incorrect and a based on a
misunderstanding of the wording in the DWARF specification. The offset
argument of DW_OP_bit_piece refers to the offset into the location
that is on the top of the DWARF expression stack, and not an offset
into the source variable. This has since also been clarified in the
DWARF specification.
This patch fixes all uses of DW_OP_bit_piece to emit the correct
offset and simplifies the DwarfExpression class to semi-automaticaly
emit empty DW_OP_pieces to adjust the offset of the source variable,
thus simplifying the code using DwarfExpression.
While this is an incompatible bugfix, in practice I don't expect this
to be much of a problem since LLVM's old interpretation and the
correct interpretation of DW_OP_bit_piece differ only when there are
gaps in the fragmented locations of the described variables or if
individual fragments are smaller than a byte. LLDB at least won't
interpret locations with gaps in them because is has no way to present
undefined bits in a variable, and there is a high probability that an
old-form expression will be malformed when interpreted correctly,
because the DW_OP_bit_piece offset will be outside of the location at
the top of the stack.
As a nice side-effect, this patch enables us to use a more efficient
encoding for subregisters: In order to express a sub-register at a
non-zero offset we now use a DW_OP_bit_piece instead of shifting the
value into place manually.
This patch also adds missing test coverage for code paths that weren't
exercised before.
<rdar://problem/29335809>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27550
llvm-svn: 289266
test/support/test_macros.h
For convenience/greppability, add macros for libcxx-specific static_asserts about noexceptness.
(Moving the definitions of ASSERT_NOEXCEPT/ASSERT_NOT_NOEXCEPT isn't technically necessary
because they're macros, but I think it's better style to define stuff before using it.)
test/std/utilities/tuple/tuple.tuple/tuple.apply/apply.pass.cpp
There was a completely unused `TrackedCallable obj;`.
apply() isn't depicted with conditional noexcept in C++17.
test/std/utilities/tuple/tuple.tuple/tuple.apply/make_from_tuple.pass.cpp
Now that we have LIBCPP_ASSERT_NOEXCEPT, use it.
Fixes D27622.
llvm-svn: 289264
Summary:
There is no point in setting SGPRS=104, because VI allocates SGPRs
in multiples of 16, so 104 -> 112. That enables us to use all 102 SGPRs
for general purposes.
Reviewers: tstellarAMD
Subscribers: qcolombet, arsenm, kzhuravl, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, tony-tye
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27149
llvm-svn: 289260
Other compilers accept invalid code here that we reject, and we need a
better error message to try to convince users that the code is really
incorrect. Consider:
class Foo {
typedef MyIterHelper<Foo> iterator;
friend class iterator;
};
Previously our wording was "elaborated type refers to a typedef".
"elaborated type" isn't widely known terminology, so the new diagnostic
says "typedef 'iterator' cannot be referenced with class specifier".
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25216
llvm-svn: 289259
Like DBG_VALUE, these emit nothing to the .text section, and sometimes
have no source location specified. Just ignore them.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D27492
llvm-svn: 289256
Dylan McKay