`{clang,gcc} -nostdlib -r a.c` passes --dynamic-linker to the linker,
and the expected behavior is to ignore it.
If .interp is kept in the relocatable object file, a final link will get
PT_INTERP even if --dynamic-linker is not specified. glibc ld.so expects
to see PT_DYNAMIC and the executable will likely fail to run.
Ignore --dynamic-linker in -r mode as well as -shared.
This restores commit 1417558e4a and its follow-up, reverted by commit c3dbd782f1.
After this commit:
clang -fuse-ld=bfd -no-pie -nostdlib a.c => .interp not created
clang -fuse-ld=bfd -pie -fPIE -nostdlib a.c => .interp created
clang -fuse-ld=gold -no-pie -nostdlib a.c => .interp not created
clang -fuse-ld=gold -pie -fPIE -nostdlib a.c => .interp created
clang -fuse-ld=lld -no-pie -nostdlib a.c => .interp created
clang -fuse-ld=lld -pie -fPIE -nostdlib a.c => .interp created
This reverts commit 1417558e4a.
Also reverts commit 019a92bb28.
This causes check-sanitizer to fail. The "-Nolib" variant of the test
crashes on startup in the loader.
Similar to rL362355, but with the `!config->shared` guard.
(1) {gcc,clang} -fuse-ld=bfd -pie -fPIE -nostdlib a.c => .interp created
(2) {gcc,clang} -fuse-ld=lld -pie -fPIE -nostdlib a.c => .interp not created
(3) {gcc,clang} -fuse-ld=lld -pie -fPIE -nostdlib a.c a.so => .interp created
The inconsistency of (2) is due to the condition `!Config->SharedFiles.empty()`.
To make lld behave more like ld.bfd, we could change the condition to:
config->hasDynSymTab && !config->dynamicLinker.empty() && script->needsInterpSection();
However, that would bring another inconsistency as can be observed with:
(4) {gcc,clang} -fuse-ld=bfd -no-pie -nostdlib a.c => .interp not created
Our .interp section is not a SyntheticSection. As a result, it terminates the
loop in removeUnusedSyntheticSections(). This has at least two consequences:
- The synthetic .bss and .bss.rel.ro sections are always present in
dynamically linked executables, even when they are not needed.
- The synthetic .ARM.exidx (and possibly other) sections are always present
in partitions other than the last one, even when not needed.
.ARM.exidx in particular is problematic because it assumes that its
list of code sections is non-empty in getLinkOrderDep(), which can
lead to a crash if the partition does not have any code sections.
Fix these problems by moving the creation of the .interp sections to the
top of createSyntheticSections(). While here, make the code a little less
error-prone by changing the add() lambdas to take a SyntheticSection instead
of an InputSectionBase.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68256
llvm-svn: 373347
(1) {gcc,clang} -fuse-ld=bfd -pie -fPIE -nostdlib a.c => .interp created
(2) {gcc,clang} -fuse-ld=lld -pie -fPIE -nostdlib a.c => .interp not created
(3) {gcc,clang} -fuse-ld=lld -pie -fPIE -nostdlib a.c a.so => .interp created
The inconsistency of (2) is due to the condition `!Config->SharedFiles.empty()`.
To make lld behave more like ld.bfd, we could change the condition to:
Config->HasDynSymTab && !Config->DynamicLinker.empty() && Script->needsInterpSection();
However, that would bring another inconsistency as can be observed with:
(4) {gcc,clang} -fuse-ld=bfd -no-pie -nostdlib a.c => .interp not created
So instead, use `!Config->DynamicLinker.empty() && Script->needsInterpSection()`,
which is both simple and consistent in these cases.
The inconsistency of (4) likely originated from ld.bfd and gold's choice to have a default --dynamic-linker.
Their condition to create .interp is ANDed with (not -shared).
Since lld doesn't have a default --dynamic-linker,
compiler drivers (gcc/clang) don't pass --dynamic-linker for -shared,
and direct ld users are not supposed to specify --dynamic-linker for -shared,
we do not need the condition !Config->Shared.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62765
llvm-svn: 362355
Fangrui Song