Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
* wrap code blocks in \code ... \endcode;
* refer to parameter names in paragraphs correctly (\arg is not what most
people want -- it starts a new paragraph);
* use \param instead of \arg to document parameters in order to be consistent
with the rest of the codebase.
llvm-svn: 163902
Use a dedicated MachO load command to annotate data-in-code regions.
This is the same format the linker produces for final executable images,
allowing consistency of representation and use of introspection tools
for both object and executable files.
Data-in-code regions are annotated via ".data_region"/".end_data_region"
directive pairs, with an optional region type.
data_region_directive := ".data_region" { region_type }
region_type := "jt8" | "jt16" | "jt32" | "jta32"
end_data_region_directive := ".end_data_region"
The previous handling of ARM-style "$d.*" labels was broken and has
been removed. Specifically, it didn't handle ARM vs. Thumb mode when
marking the end of the section.
rdar://11459456
llvm-svn: 157062
When not using subsections via symbols, the assembler can resolve
symbol differences (including pcrel references) to non-local
labels at assembly time, not just those in the same atom.
llvm-svn: 148865
If the two fragments are in the same Atom, then the difference
expression is resolvable at compile time. Previously we were checking
that they were in the same fragment, but that breaks down in the
presence of instruction relaxation which has multiple fragments in the
same atom.
rdar://10711829
llvm-svn: 148423
When the non-local symbol in the expression is in the same fragment
as the second symbol, the assembler can still evaluate the expression
without needing a relocation.
For example, on ARM:
_foo:
ldr lr, (_foo - 4)
rdar://10348687
llvm-svn: 148341
When the file isn't being built with subsections-via-symbols, symbol
differences involving non-local symbols can be resolved more aggressively.
Needed for gas compatibility.
llvm-svn: 146054
Assigned symbol addresses get truncated to 32-bits, even on 64-bit platforms.
That's obviously bogus.
For example,
.globl _foo
.equ _foo, 0x987654321ULL
rdar://9922863
llvm-svn: 137158
Move the target-specific RecordRelocation logic out of the generic MC
MachObjectWriter and into the target-specific object writers. This allows
nuking quite a bit of target knowledge from the supposedly target-independent
bits in lib/MC.
llvm-svn: 133844
(yes, this is different from R_ARM_CALL)
- Adds a new method getARMBranchTargetOpValue() which handles the
necessary distinction between the conditional and unconditional br/bl
needed for ARM/ELF
At least for ARM mode, the needed fixup for conditional versus unconditional
br/bl is identical, but the ARM docs and existing ARM tools expect this
reloc type...
Added a few FIXME's for future naming fixups in ARMInstrInfo.td
llvm-svn: 124895
- Fixed :upper16: fix up routine. It should be shifting down the top 16 bits first.
- Added support for Thumb2 :lower16: and :upper16: fix up.
- Added :upper16: and :lower16: relocation support to mach-o object writer.
llvm-svn: 123424
Daniel Dunbar