Before:
DEBUG({ // Comment that used to confuse clang-format.
fdafas();
});
Before:
DEBUG({ // Comments are now fine.
fdafas();
});
This fixed llvm.org/PR17619.
llvm-svn: 193051
Before, clang-format would not adjust leading indents if it found a
structural error (e.g. unmatched {}). It seems, however, that
clang-format has gotten good enough at parsing the code structure that
this hurts in almost all cases. Commonly, while writing code, it is
very useful to be able to correclty indent incomplete if statements or
for loops.
In case this leads to errors that we don't anticipate, we need to find
out and fix those.
This fixed llvm.org/PR17594.
llvm-svn: 192988
Summary:
Store IndentationLevel in ParentState and use it instead of the
Line::Level when indening.
Also fixed incorrect indentation level calculation in formatFirstToken.
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
CC: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1797
llvm-svn: 192563
In certain macros or incorrect string literals, the token stream can
contain 'unknown' tokens, e.g. a single backslash or a set of empty
ticks. clang-format simply treated them as whitespace and removed them
prior to this patch.
This fixes llvm.org/PR17215
llvm-svn: 192490
The help text for clang-format's -style option and the function that processes
its value is moved to libFormat in this patch. The goal is to enable other
tools that use libFormat and also have a -style option to behave consistently
with clang-format.
llvm-svn: 191666
Summary:
Changed UseTab to be a enum with three options: Never, Always,
ForIndentation (true/false are still supported when reading .clang-format).
IndentLevel should currently be propagated correctly for all tokens, except for
block comments. Please take a look at the general idea before I start dealing
with block comments.
Reviewers: klimek, djasper
Reviewed By: klimek
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1770
llvm-svn: 191527
Summary:
reformat() tries to determine the newline style used in the input
(either LF or CR LF), and uses it for the output. Maybe not every single case is
supported, but at least the bug described in http://llvm.org/PR17182 should be
resolved.
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
CC: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1643
llvm-svn: 190519
Summary: This also unifies the handling of escaped newlines for all tokens.
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
CC: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1638
llvm-svn: 190405
Summary:
This fixes various issues with mixed tabs and spaces handling, e.g.
when realigning block comments.
Reviewers: klimek, djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1608
llvm-svn: 190395
Let clang-format consistently keep up to one empty line (configured via
FormatStyle::MaxEmptyLinesToKeep) in nested blocks, e.g. lambdas. Also,
actually format single statements in nested blocks.
Before:
DEBUG({ int i; });
DEBUG({
int i;
// an empty line here would just be removed.
int j;
});
After:
DEBUG({ int i; });
DEBUG({
int i;
int j;
});
llvm-svn: 190278
Before:
FirstToken->WhitespaceRange.getBegin()
.getLocWithOffset(First->LastNewlineOffset);
After:
FirstToken->WhitespaceRange.getBegin().getLocWithOffset(
First->LastNewlineOffset);
Re-add logic to prevent breaking after an empty set of parentheses.
Basically it seems that calling a function without parameters is more
like navigating along the same object than it is a separate step of a
builder-type call.
We might need to extends this in future to allow "short" parameters that
e.g. are an index accessing a specific element.
llvm-svn: 190126
This fixes two issues:
1) The indent of a line comment was not adapted to the subsequent
statement as it would be outside of a nested block.
2) A missing DryRun flag caused actualy breaks to be inserted in
overly long comments while trying to come up with the best line
breaking decisions.
llvm-svn: 190123
Summary:
Count column width instead of the number of code points. This also
includes correct handling of tabs inside string literals and comments (with an
exception of multiline string literals/comments, where tabs are present before
the first escaped newline).
Reviewers: djasper, klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
CC: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1601
llvm-svn: 190052
Summary:
Store first and last newline position in the token text for string literals and
comments to avoid doing .find('\n') for each possible solution.
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
CC: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1556
llvm-svn: 189758
Summary:
Calculate characters in the first and the last line correctly so that
we only break before the literal when needed.
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
CC: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1544
llvm-svn: 189595
We now count the original token's column directly when lexing the
tokens, where we already have all knowledge about where lines start.
Before this patch, formatting:
void f() {
\tg();
\th();
}
would incorrectly count the \t's as 1 character if only the line
containing h() was reformatted, and thus indent h() at offset 1.
llvm-svn: 189585
Two changes:
* Don't add an extra penalty on breaking the same token multiple times.
Generally, we should prefer not to break, but once we break, the
normal line breaking penalties apply.
* Slightly increase the penalty for breaking comments. In general, the
author has put some thought into how to break the comment and we
should not overwrite this unnecessarily.
With a 40-column column limit, formatting
aaaaaa("aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa");
Leads to:
Before:
aaaaaa(
"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa "
"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa");
After:
aaaaaa("aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa "
"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa "
"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa");
llvm-svn: 189466
With this patch, braced lists (with more than 3 elements are formatted in a
column layout if possible). E.g.:
static const uint16_t CallerSavedRegs64Bit[] = {
X86::RAX, X86::RDX, X86::RCX, X86::RSI, X86::RDI,
X86::R8, X86::R9, X86::R10, X86::R11, 0
};
Required other changes:
- FormatTokens can now have a special role that contains extra data and can do
special formattings. A comma separated list is currently the only
implementation.
- Move penalty calculation entirely into ContinuationIndenter (there was a last
piece still in UnwrappedLineFormatter).
Review: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1457
llvm-svn: 189018
Before:
if (!aaaaaaaaaa( // break
aaaaa)) {
}
After:
if (!aaaaaaaaaa( // break
aaaaa)) {
}
Also cleaned up formatting using clang-format.
llvm-svn: 188891
This patch adds four new options to control:
- Spaces after control keyworks (if(..) vs if (..))
- Spaces in empty parentheses (f( ) vs f())
- Spaces in c-style casts (( int )1.0 vs (int)1.0)
- Spaces in other parentheses (f(a) vs f( a ))
Patch by Joe Hermaszewski. Thank you for working on this!
llvm-svn: 188793
Goals: Structure code better and make components easier to use for
future features (e.g. column layout for long braced initializers).
No functional changes intended.
llvm-svn: 188543
Some coding styles use a different indent for constructor initializers.
Patch by Klemens Baum. Thank you.
Review: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1360
Post review changes: Changed data type to unsigned as a negative indent
width does not make sense and added test for configuration parsing.
llvm-svn: 188260
In particular, left braces after an enum declaration now occur on their
own line. Further, when short ifs/whiles are allowed these no longer
cause the left brace to be on the same line as the if/while when a
brace is included.
Patch by Thomas Gibson-Robinson.
llvm-svn: 187901
Before, clang-format would not break overly long string literals
following a "<<" with FormatStyle::AlwaysBreakBeforeMultilineStrings
being set.
llvm-svn: 187650
Before:
template <bool B, bool C>
class A {
static_assert(B &&C, "Something is wrong");
};
After:
template <bool B, bool C>
class A {
static_assert(B && C, "Something is wrong");
};
(Note the spacing around '&&'). Also change the identifier table to always
understand all C++11 keywords (which seems like the right thing to do).
llvm-svn: 187589
With this patch, clang-format can be configured to:
* not indent in namespace at all (former behavior).
* indent in namespace as in other blocks.
* indent only in inner namespaces (as required by WebKit style).
Also fix alignment of access specifiers in WebKit style.
Patch started by Marek Kurdej. Thank you!
llvm-svn: 187540
New options:
* Break before the commas of constructor initializers and align
the commas with the colon.
* Break before binary operators
Additionally, for styles without column limit, don't just accept
linebreaks done by the user, but instead remove 'invalid' (according
to the current style) linebreaks and add 'required' ones.
llvm-svn: 187210
This is far from implementing all the rules given by
http://www.webkit.org/coding/coding-style.html
The important new feature is the support for styles that don't have a
column limit. For such styles, clang-format will (at the moment) simply
respect the input's formatting decisions within statements.
llvm-svn: 187033
The AlwaysBreakBeforeMultilineStrings rule does not really make sense
if it does not a column gain.
Before (in Google style):
f(
"aaaa"
"bbbb");
After:
f("aaaa"
"bbbb");
llvm-svn: 186515
Motivating example:
// column limit ------------------->
void ffffffffffff(int aaaaaa /* test */);
Formatting before the patch:
void ffffffffffff(int aaaaaa /* test
*/);
Formatting after the patch:
void
ffffffffffff(int aaaaaa /* test */);
llvm-svn: 186471
Summary:
These can appear when comments contain command lines with quoted line
breaks. As the text (including escaped newlines and '//' from consecutive lines)
is a single line comment, we used to break it even when it didn't exceed column
limit. This is a temporary solution, in the future we may want to support this
case completely - at least adjust leading whitespace when changing indentation
of the first line.
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
CC: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1146
llvm-svn: 186456
Daniel Jasper