an integral constant expression, maintain a cache of the value and the
is-an-ICE flag within the VarDecl itself. This eliminates
exponential-time behavior of the Fibonacci template metaprogram.
llvm-svn: 72428
alternatives, but please correct me if I'm wrong.
I eventually plan to assert in mergeTypes that we aren't in C++ mode
because composite types are fundamentally not a part of C++. The
remaining callers for code in the regression tests are
Sema::WarnConflictingTypedMethods and CodeGenFunction::EmitFunctionProlog;
I'm not quite sure what the correct approach is for those callers.
llvm-svn: 71946
template<typename T>
struct X {
struct Inner;
};
template struct X<int>::Inner;
This change is larger than it looks because it also fixes some
a problem with nested-name-specifiers and tags. We weren't requiring
the DeclContext associated with the scope specifier of a tag to be
complete. Therefore, when looking for something like "struct
X<int>::Inner", we weren't instantiating X<int>.
This, naturally, uncovered a problem with member pointers, where we
were requiring the left-hand side of a member pointer access
expression (e.g., x->*) to be a complete type. However, this is wrong:
the semantics of this expression does not require a complete type (EDG
agrees).
Stuart vouched for me. Blame him.
llvm-svn: 71756
template class X<int>;
This also cleans up the propagation of template information through
declaration parsing, which is used to improve some diagnostics.
llvm-svn: 71608
Per the FIXME, it might be interesting to track whether the inline keyword
was also used on the method, but for now we don't do this. Testcase pending.
llvm-svn: 71589
specialization" within a C++ template, and permit name lookup into the
current instantiation. For example, given:
template<typename T, typename U>
struct X {
typedef T type;
X* x1; // current instantiation
X<T, U> *x2; // current instantiation
X<U, T> *x3; // not current instantiation
::X<type, U> *x4; // current instantiation
X<typename X<type, U>::type, U>: *x5; // current instantiation
};
llvm-svn: 71471
template. The injected-class-name is either a type or a template,
depending on whether a '<' follows it. As a type, the
injected-class-name's template argument list contains its template
parameters in declaration order.
As part of this, add logic for canonicalizing declarations, and be
sure to canonicalize declarations used in template names and template
arguments.
A TagType is dependent if the declaration it references is dependent.
I'm not happy about the rather complicated protocol needed to use
ASTContext::getTemplateSpecializationType.
llvm-svn: 71408
1. In a struct field redefinition, don't mark the struct erroneous. The
field is erroneous, but the struct is otherwise well formed.
2. Don't emit diagnostics about functions that are known to be broken already.
Either fix is sufficient to silence the second diagnostic in the example,
but the combination is better :)
llvm-svn: 70371
mode and in the presence of __gnu_inline__ attributes. This should fix
both PR3989 and PR4069.
As part of this, we now keep track of all of the attributes attached
to each declaration even after we've performed declaration
merging. This fixes PR3264.
llvm-svn: 70292
that if we're going to print an extension warning anyway,
there's no point to changing behavior based on NoExtensions: it will
only make error recovery worse.
Note that this doesn't cause any behavior change because NoExtensions
isn't used by the current front-end. I'm still considering what to do about
the remaining use of NoExtensions in IdentifierTable.cpp.
llvm-svn: 70273
before r69391: typedef redefinition is an error by default, but if
*either* the old or new definition are from a system header, we silence
it.
llvm-svn: 70177
always return a non-null QualType + error bit. This fixes a bunch of
cases that didn't check for null result (and could thus crash) and eliminates
some crappy code scattered throughout sema.
This also improves the diagnostics in the recursive struct case to eliminate
a bogus second error. It also cleans up the case added to function.c by forming
a proper function type even though the declarator is erroneous, allowing the
parameter to be added to the function. Before:
t.c:2:1: error: unknown type name 'unknown_type'
unknown_type f(void*P)
^
t.c:4:3: error: use of undeclared identifier 'P'
P+1;
^
After:
t.c:2:1: error: unknown type name 'unknown_type'
unknown_type f(void*P)
^
llvm-svn: 70023
This gets rid of a bunch of random InvalidDecl bools in sema, changing
us to use the following approach:
1. When analyzing a declspec or declarator, if an error is found, we
set a bit in Declarator saying that it is invalid.
2. Once the Decl is created by sema, we immediately set the isInvalid
bit on it from what is in the declarator. From this point on, sema
consistently looks at and sets the bit on the decl.
This gives a very clear separation of concerns and simplifies a bunch
of code. In addition to this, this patch makes these changes:
1. it renames DeclSpec::getInvalidType() -> isInvalidType().
2. various "merge" functions no longer return bools: they just set the
invalid bit on the dest decl if invalid.
3. The ActOnTypedefDeclarator/ActOnFunctionDeclarator/ActOnVariableDeclarator
methods now set invalid on the decl returned instead of returning an
invalid bit byref.
4. In SemaType, refering to a typedef that was invalid now propagates the
bit into the resultant type. Stuff declared with the invalid typedef
will now be marked invalid.
5. Various methods like CheckVariableDeclaration now return void and set the
invalid bit on the decl they check.
There are a few minor changes to tests with this, but the only major bad
result is test/SemaCXX/constructor-recovery.cpp. I'll take a look at this
next.
llvm-svn: 70020
parameters in a functiondecl, even if the decl is invalid and has a confusing
Declarator. On the testcase, we now emit one beautiful diagnostic:
t.c:2:1: error: unknown type name 'unknown_type'
unknown_type f(void*)
^
GCC 4.0 produces:
t.c:2: error: syntax error before ‘f’
t.c: In function ‘f’:
t.c:2: error: parameter name omitted
and GCC 4.2:
t.c:2: error: expected ‘=’, ‘,’, ‘;’, ‘asm’ or ‘__attribute__’ before ‘f’
llvm-svn: 70016
remove a special case that was apparently for typeof() and
generalize the code in SemaDecl that handles typedefs to
handle any sugar type (including typedef, typeof, etc).
Improve comment to make it more clear what is going on.
llvm-svn: 70015
typedef void foo(void);
We get a typedef for a functiontypeproto with no arguments, not
one with one argument and type void. This means the code being
removed in SemaDecl is dead.
llvm-svn: 70013
by correctly propagating the fact that the type was invalid up to the
attributeRuns decl, then returning an ExprError when attributeRuns is
formed (like we do for normal declrefexprs).
llvm-svn: 69998
Sebastian Redl