Prior to the changes from D52010, clobbering Thumb's high registers in
inline asm would cause incorrect code to be generated - or an assertion
failure for debug builds. Now that the issue is no longer reproducible,
this patch adds a MIR test to cover that scenario.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96335
The logic is almost similar to that of system.cpp with one change that
instead of adding all the memory pools to a device struct it only
keeps a single pool. The existing approach also always allocated memory on
the first HSA pool found for a GPU.
This depends on D104691. The goal of this series of patches is to remove
_atl_machine global. The next patch will drop g_atl_machine entirely.
Reviewed By: JonChesterfield
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104695
Since RangeSet::Factory actually contains BasicValueFactory, we can
remove value factory from many function signatures inside the solver.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105005
I can't be sure of the cause but I believe these fail
due to to fast unwinding not working on Thumb.
Whatever the case, they have been failing on our bots
for a long time:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/170/builds/46
Require fast-unwinder-works for both.
This change modifies the existing check-debuginfo target to only run the
debuginfo tests within the cross-project-tests, and adds a new target
(check-cross-project) which runs all the tests. The former has also been
modified to not be included in check-all (since the check-cross-project
target covers them).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96513
Reviewed by: aprantl
Also mark debuginfo_tests as UNSUPPORTED if clang can't be found and
remove it from the list of test dependencies if not in
LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96511
Reviewed by: aprantl
Currently we will allow loops with a fixed width VF of 1 to vectorize
if the -enable-strict-reductions flag is set. However, the loop vectorizer
will not use ordered reductions if `VF.isScalar()` and the resulting
vectorized loop will be out of order.
This patch removes `VF.isVector()` when checking if ordered reductions
should be used. Also, instead of converting the FAdds to reductions if the
VF = 1, operands of the FAdds are changed such that the order is preserved.
Reviewed By: david-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104533
Sinking scalar operands into predicated-triangle regions may allow
merging regions. This patch adds a VPlan-to-VPlan transform that tries
to merge predicate-triangle regions after sinking.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100260
This test has always failed on 32 bit armv8 bots:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/178/builds/42
Due to the output order of some symbols changing.
I don't think this is an Arm specific issue so disabling
on 32 bit while it's investigated.
While the original check's purpose is to identify potentially dangerous
functions based on the parameter types (as identifier names do not mean
anything when it comes to the language rules), unfortunately, such a plain
interface check rule can be incredibly noisy. While the previous
"filtering heuristic" is able to find many similar usages, there is an entire
class of parameters that should not be warned about very easily mixed by that
check: parameters that have a name and their name follows a pattern,
e.g. `text1, text2, text3, ...`.`
This patch implements a simple, but powerful rule, that allows us to detect
such cases and ensure that no warnings are emitted for parameter sequences that
follow a pattern, even if their types allow for them to be potentially mixed at a call site.
Given a threshold `k`, warnings about two parameters are filtered from the
result set if the names of the parameters are either prefixes or suffixes of
each other, with at most k letters difference on the non-common end.
(Assuming that the names themselves are at least `k` long.)
- The above `text1, text2` is an example of this. (Live finding from Xerces.)
- `LHS` and `RHS` are also fitting the bill here. (Live finding from... virtually any project.)
- So does `Qmat, Tmat, Rmat`. (Live finding from I think OpenCV.)
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D97297
There are several types of functions and various reasons why some
"swappable parameters" cannot be fixed with changing the parameters' types, etc.
The most common example might be int `min(int a, int b)`... no matter what you
do, the two parameters must remain the same type.
The **filtering heuristic** implemented in this patch deals with trying to find
such functions during the modelling and building of the swappable parameter
range.
If the parameter currently scrutinised matches either of the predicates below,
it will be regarded as **not swappable** even if the type of the parameter
matches.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D78652
Adds a relaxation option ModelImplicitConversions which will make the check
report for cases where parameters refer to types that are implicitly
convertible to one another.
Example:
struct IntBox { IntBox(int); operator int(); };
void foo(int i, double d, IntBox ib) {}
Implicit conversions are the last to model in the set of things that are
reasons for the possibility of a function being called the wrong way which is
not always immediately apparent when looking at the function (signature or
call).
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, martong
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D75041
Adds a relaxation option QualifiersMix which will make the check report for
cases where parameters refer to the same type if they only differ in qualifiers.
This makes cases, such as the following, not warned about by default, produce
a warning.
void* memcpy(void* dst, const void* src, unsigned size) {}
However, unless people meticulously const their local variables, unfortunately,
even such a function carry a potential swap:
T* obj = new T; // Not const!!!
void* buf = malloc(sizeof(T));
memcpy(obj, buf, sizeof(T));
// ^~~ ^~~ accidental swap here, even though the interface "specified" a const.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D96355
The base patch only deals with strict (canonical) type equality, which is
merely a subset of all the dangerous function interfaces that we intend to
find.
In addition, in the base patch, canonical type equivalence is not diagnosed in
a way that is immediately apparent to the user.
This patch extends the check with two features:
* Proper typedef diagnostics and explanations to the user.
* "Reference bind power" matching.
Case 2 is a necessary addition because in every case someone encounters a
function `f(T t, const T& tr)`, any expression that might be passed to either
can be passed to both. Thus, such adjacent parameter sequences should be
matched.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D95736
Finds function definitions where parameters of convertible types follow
each other directly, making call sites prone to calling the function
with swapped (or badly ordered) arguments.
Such constructs are usually the result of inefficient design and lack of
exploitation of strong type capabilities that are possible in the
language.
This check finds and flags **function definitions** and **not** call
sites!
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, alexfh
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D69560
This adds another small fold for extract of a vdup, between a i32 and a
f32, converting to a BITCAST. This allows some extra folding to happen,
simplifying the resulting code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104857
The patch reuses the common code to print memory operand addresses as
instruction comments. This helps to align the comments and enables using
target-specific comment markers when `evaluateMemoryOperandAddress()` is
implemented for them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104861
For now, the source variable locations are printed at about the same
space as the comments for disassembled code, which can make some ranges
for variables disappear if a line contains comments, for example:
┠─ bar = W1
0: add x0, x2, #2, lsl #12 // =8192┃
4: add z31.d, z31.d, #65280 // =0xff00
8: nop ┻
The patch shifts the report a bit to allow printing comments up to
approximately 16 characters without interferences.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104700
LLVM disassembler can generate comments for disassembled instructions.
The patch enables printing these comments for 'llvm-objdump -d'.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104699
We can exploit branches by `undef` condition. Frankly, the LangRef says that
such branches are UB, so we can assume that all outgoing edges of such blocks
are dead.
However, from practical perspective, we know that this is not supported correctly
in some other places. So we are being conservative about it.
Branch by undef is treated in the following way:
- If it is a loop-exiting branch, we always assume it exits the loop;
- If not, we arbitrarily assume it takes `true` value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104689
Reviewed By: nikic
cli-wrapper-mpxtable.cpp was emitting warnings from printfs of
uint64_t on 32 bit arm build. This patch makes affected printfs
in cli-wrapper-mpxtable.cpp portable accross targets variants.
This test is again failing across multiple bots and passing on others
there is no reliable way to enable it for some of the bots while
disabling for the unsupported ones. Tagging it as unsupported across all
types of Arm 32 bit cores.
A combination of features ^ that lead to a mismatch of expectations
about how a subprogram definition DIE would be produced with/without a
declaration when taking full -g debug info and inlining it into a -gmlt
CU - specifically when using Split DWARF that doesn't support cross-CU
references, so we have to put the -g debug info into the -gmlt CU, which
gets confusing about which mode is respected.
This patch comes down on respecting the CU the debug info is emitted
into, rather than preserving the full debug info when it's emitted into
the gmlt CU.
We use (and (ctpop X), 1) to represent parity.
The generated code for i32 parity on RV64 has more instructions than
necessary which I hope to improve in a followup patch.
Also add missing test for i64 ctpop.
After D104475 / D104658, building the Linux kernel with ThinLTO is
broken:
ld.lld: error: Unknown attribute kind (73) (Producer: 'LLVM13.0.0git'
Reader: 'LLVM 13.0.0git')
getAttrFromCode() has never handled this attribute so it is written
during the ThinLTO phase but it cannot be handled during the linking
phase.
Add noprofile to getAttrFromCode() so that disassembly works properly.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104995
I thought this might help with another optimization I was
thinking about, but I don't think it will. So it just wastes
compile time calling computeKnownBits for no benefit.
This reverts commit 81b2f95971.
For the start shortening optimization, always use a i8 type for
the GEP, as it is a raw offset calculation.
Handling of non-i8* memset/memcpy arguments requires insertion
of casts. These cases were previously miscompiled, as the offset
calculation was performed on the wrong type.
Apparently, it is legal to use memcpy/memset with pointer types
other than i8*. Prior to 81fcdae68c
this case was silently miscompiled, as the i8 offset calculation
was performed on some other type. Now it would crash due to a
type mismatch. Fix this by inserting an explicit bitcast to i8*.
Lucas Prates