the presence and form of a ref-qualifier. Note that we do *not* yet
implement the restriction in C++0x [over.load]p2 that requires either
all non-static functions with a given parameter-type-list to have a
ref-qualifier or none of them to have a ref-qualifier.
llvm-svn: 124297
using rules that I just made up this morning. This encoding has now
been proposed to the Itanium C++ ABI group for inclusion, but of
course it's still possible that the mangling will change.
llvm-svn: 124296
- Don't publicize a C++0x feature through __has_feature if we aren't
in C++0x mode (even if the feature is available only with a
warning).
- "auto" is not implemented well enough for its __has_feature to be
turned on.
- Fix the test of C++0x __has_feature to actually test what we're
trying to test. Searching for the substring "foo" when our options
are "foo" and "no_foo" doesn't work :)
llvm-svn: 124291
- Add ref-qualifiers to the type system; they are part of the
canonical type. Print & profile ref-qualifiers
- Translate the ref-qualifier from the Declarator chunk for
functions to the function type.
- Diagnose mis-uses of ref-qualifiers w.r.t. static member
functions, free functions, constructors, destructors, etc.
- Add serialization and deserialization of ref-qualifiers.
llvm-svn: 124281
after a 'return' in a CFGBlock. This accidentally
was working before, but the false assumption that
'return' always appeared at the end of the block
was uncovered by a recent change.
llvm-svn: 124280
I'm separately committing this because it incidentally changes some
block orderings and minor IR issues, like using a phi instead of
an unnecessary alloca.
llvm-svn: 124277
handling all CFGElement kinds. While writing
the test case, it turned out that return-noreturn.cpp
wasn't actually testing anything since it has the wrong -W
flag. That uncovered another regression with
the handling of destructors marked noreturn. WIP.
llvm-svn: 124238
for reference binding (C++ [over.rank.ics]p3b1sb4), so that we prefer
the binding of an lvalue reference to a function lvalue over the
binding of an rvalue reference. This change resolves the ambiguity
with std::forward and lvalue references to function types in a way
that seems consistent with the original rvalue references proposal.
My proposed wording for this change is shown in
isBetterReferenceBindingKind(); we'll try to get this change adopted
in the C++0x working paper as well.
llvm-svn: 124236
authors to write
class __attribute__((forbid_temporaries)) Name { ... };
when they want to force users to name all variables of the type. This protects
people from doing things like creating a scoped_lock that only lives for a
single statement instead of an entire scope.
The warning produced by this attribute can be disabled by
-Wno-forbid-temporaries.
llvm-svn: 124217
(C++0x [over.ics.rank]p3) when one binding is an lvalue reference and
the other is an rvalue reference that binds to an rvalue. In
particular, we were using the predict "is an rvalue reference" rather
than "is an rvalue reference that binds to an rvalue", which was
incorrect in the one case where an rvalue reference can bind to an
lvalue: function references.
This particular issue cropped up with std::forward, where Clang was
picking an std::forward overload while forwarding an (lvalue)
reference to a function. However (and unfortunately!), the right
answer for this code is that the call to std::forward is
ambiguous. Clang now gets that right, but we need to revisit the
std::forward implementation in libc++.
llvm-svn: 124216
generate meaningful [*] template argument location information.
[*] Well, as meaningful as possible, given that this entire code path
is a hack for when we've lost type-source information.
llvm-svn: 124211
during template instantiation. This code needs to eventually die, but
this little tweak fixes PR8629, where bad location information slipped
through to the location of a class template instantiation.
llvm-svn: 124199
T) when taking the address of an overloaded function or matching a
specialization to a template (C++0x [temp.deduct.type]p10). Fixes
PR9044.
llvm-svn: 124197
and turn on __has_feature(cxx_rvalue_references). The core rvalue
references proposal seems to be fully implemented now, pending lots
more testing.
llvm-svn: 124169
We translate property accesses to obj-c messages by simulating "loads" or "stores" to properties
using a pseudo-location SVal kind (ObjCPropRef).
Checkers can now reason about obj-c messages for both explicit message expressions and implicit
messages due to property accesses.
llvm-svn: 124161
messages that are sent for handling properties in dot syntax.
Replace all direct uses of ObjCMessageExpr in the checkers and checker interface with ObjCMessage.
llvm-svn: 124159
implementation used by overload resolution to support rvalue
references. The original commits caused PR9026 and some
hard-to-reproduce self-host breakage.
The only (crucial!) difference between this commit and the previous
commits is that we now properly check the SuppressUserConversions flag
before attempting to perform a second user-defined conversion in
reference binding, breaking the infinite recursion chain of
user-defined conversions.
Rvalue references should be working a bit better now.
llvm-svn: 124121
error: no super class declared in @interface for 'XXX'
to be:
error: 'X' cannot use 'super' because it is a root class
The latter explains what the user actually did wrong.
Fixes: <rdar://problem/8904409>
llvm-svn: 124074
clang's -Wuninitialized-experimental warning.
While these don't look like real bugs, clang's
-Wuninitialized-experimental analysis is stricter
than GCC's, and these fixes have the benefit
of being general nice cleanups.
llvm-svn: 124072
to issue the warning at an uninitialized variable's
declaration, but to issue notes at possible
uninitialized uses (which could be multiple).
llvm-svn: 123994
when returning an NRVO candidate expression. For example, this
properly picks the move constructor when dealing with code such as
MoveOnlyType f() { MoveOnlyType mot; return mot; }
The previously-XFAIL'd rvalue-references test case now works, and has
been moved into the appropriate paragraph-specific test case.
llvm-svn: 123992
NRVO candidate for a return statement, to
Sema::getCopyElisionCandidate(), and teach it enough to also determine
the NRVO candidate for a throw expression. We still don't use the
latter information, however.
Along the way, implement core issue 1148, which eliminates copy
elision from catch parameters and clarifies that copy elision cannot
occur from function parameters (which we already implemented).
llvm-svn: 123982
resolution to match the latest C++0x working paper's semantics. The
implementation now matching up with the reference-binding
implementation used for initialization.
llvm-svn: 123977
call (C++0x [temp.deduct.call]p3).
As part of this, start improving the reference-binding implementation
used in the computation of implicit conversion sequences (for overload
resolution) to reflect C++0x semantics. It still needs more work and
testing, of course.
llvm-svn: 123966
Inheritable attributes on declarations may be inherited by any later
redeclaration at merge time. By contrast, a non-inheritable attribute
will not be inherited by later redeclarations. Non-inheritable
attributes may be semantically analysed early, allowing them to
influence the redeclaration/overloading process.
Before this change, the "overloadable" attribute received special
handling to be treated as non-inheritable, while all other attributes
were treated as inheritable. This patch generalises the concept,
while removing a FIXME. Some CUDA location attributes are also marked
as non-inheritable in order to support special overloading semantics
(to be introduced in a later patch).
The patch introduces a new Attr subclass, InheritableAttr, from
which all inheritable attributes derive. Non-inheritable attributes
simply derive from Attr.
N.B. I did not review every attribute to determine whether it should
be marked non-inheritable. This can be done later on an incremental
basis, as this change does not affect default functionality.
llvm-svn: 123959
specification. In particular, an rvalue reference can bind to an
initializer expression that is an lvalue if the referent type and the
initializer expression type are not reference-related. This is a newer
formulation to the previous "rvalue references can never bind to
lvalues" rule.
llvm-svn: 123952
Douglas Gregor