Summary:
Following D48903 ([VirtualFileSystem] InMemoryFileSystem::status: Return
a Status with the requested name), the paths output by clang-move in the
FileToReplacements map may contain leading "./". For example, where we
would get "foo.h", we'll now get "./foo.h". This breaks the tests,
because we are doing exact string lookups in the FileToFileID and
Results maps (they contain "foo.h", but we search for "./foo.h").
To mitigate this, try to normalize a little bit the paths output by
clang-move to remove that leading "./".
This patch should be safe to merge before D48903, remove_dots will just
be a no-op.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: ioeric, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48951
llvm-svn: 336358
Summary: Surface it in the completion items C++ API, and when a flag is set.
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48938
llvm-svn: 336309
Summary:
We now compute a distance from the main file to the symbol header, which
is a weighted count of:
- some number of #include traversals from source file --> included file
- some number of FS traversals from file --> parent directory
- some number of FS traversals from parent directory --> child file/dir
This calculation is performed in the appropriate URI scheme.
This means we'll get some proximity boost from header files in main-file
contexts, even when these are in different directory trees.
This extended file proximity model is not yet incorporated in the index
interface/implementation.
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: mgorny, ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48441
llvm-svn: 336177
Summary:
This allows hovering on keywords that refer to deduced types.
This should cover most useful cases. Not covered:
- auto template parameters: Since this can be instantiated with many types,
it would not be practical to show the types.
- Structured binding: This could be done later to show multiple deduced types
in the hover.
- auto:: (part of concepts): Outside the scope of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Marc-Andre Laperle <marc-andre.laperle@ericsson.com>
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48159
llvm-svn: 336119
Summary:
This provides more structured information that embedders can use for rendering.
ClangdLSPServer continues to call render(), so NFC.
The patch is:
- trivial changes to ClangdServer/ClangdLSPServer
- mostly-mechanical updates to CodeCompleteTests etc for the new API
- new direct tests of render() in CodeCompleteTests
- tiny cleanups to CodeCompletionItem (operator<< and missing initializers)
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48821
llvm-svn: 336094
Summary:
(Originally started as a clang-tidy check but there's already D45444 so shifted to just adding ExprMutationAnalyzer)
`ExprMutationAnalyzer` is a generally useful helper that can be used in different clang-tidy checks for checking whether a given expression is (potentially) mutated within a statement (typically the enclosing compound statement.)
This is a more general and more powerful/accurate version of isOnlyUsedAsConst, which is used in ForRangeCopyCheck, UnnecessaryCopyInitialization.
It should also be possible to construct checks like D45444 (suggest adding const to variable declaration) or https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21981 (suggest adding const to member function) using this helper function.
This function is tested by itself and is intended to stay generally useful instead of tied to any particular check.
Reviewers: hokein, alexfh, aaron.ballman, ilya-biryukov, george.karpenkov
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, shuaiwang, rnkovacs, hokein, alexfh, aaron.ballman, a.sidorin, Eugene.Zelenko, xazax.hun, JonasToth, klimek, mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Patch by Shuai Wang.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45679
llvm-svn: 335736
Summary:
Injected names being ranked too high was just a bug.
The high boost for keywords was intended, but was too much given how useless
keywords are. We should probably boost them on a case-by-case basis eventually.
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48368
llvm-svn: 335723
Summary:
Comments from namespaces that clangd produces are too noisy and often
not useful.
Namespaces have too many redecls and we don't have a good way of
determining which of the comments are relevant and which should be
ignored (e.g. because they come from code generators like the protobuf
compiler).
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48211
llvm-svn: 335718
Summary:
Instead of checking symbol name and container (scope) separately, check the
qualified name instead. This is much shorter and similar to how it is done
in the SymbolCollector tests.
Signed-off-by: Marc-Andre Laperle <marc-andre.laperle@ericsson.com>
Reviewers: simark
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47847
llvm-svn: 335624
Summary:
Previously, the strings matched LSP completion pretty closely.
The completion label was a single string, for instance. This made
implementing completion itself easy but makes it hard to use the names
in other way, e.g. pretty-printed name in synthesized
documentation/hover.
It also limits our introspection into completion items, which can only
be as precise as the indexed symbols. This change is a prerequisite to
improvements to overload bundling which need to inspect e.g. signature
structure.
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48475
llvm-svn: 335360
Summary:
The qualified name can be used to match a completion item to its corresponding
symbol. This can be useful for tools that measure code completion quality.
Qualified names are not precise for identifying symbols; we need to figure out a
better way to identify completion items.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48425
llvm-svn: 335334
Summary:
It's almost always identical to Name, and in fact we never used it (we used name
instead).
The only case where they differ is objc method selectors (foo: vs foo:bar:).
We can live with the latter for both name and filterText, so I've made that
change too.
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48375
llvm-svn: 335321
Summary: This allows tools to examine symbols that would be collected in a symbol index. For example, a tool that measures index-based completion quality would be interested in references to symbols that are collected in the index.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48418
llvm-svn: 335218
Summary:
Some URI schemes require a hint path to be provided, and workspace root
path seems to be a good fit.
Reviewers: sammccall, malaperle
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48290
llvm-svn: 335035
Summary:
For completion items that would trigger include insertions (i.e. index symbols
that are not #included yet), add a visual indicator "+" before the completion
label. The inserted headers will appear in the completion detail.
Open to suggestions for better visual indicators; "+" was picked because it
seems cleaner than a few other candidates I've tried (*, #, @ ...).
The displayed header would be like a/b/c.h (without quote) or <vector> for system
headers. I didn't add quotation or "#include" because they can take up limited
space and do not provide additional information after users know what the
headers are. I think a header alone should be obvious for users to infer that
this is an include header..
To align indentation, also prepend ' ' to labels of candidates that would not
trigger include insertions (only for completions where index results are
possible).
Vim:
{F6357587}
vscode:
{F6357589}
{F6357591}
Reviewers: sammccall, ilya-biryukov, hokein
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48163
llvm-svn: 334828
Summary:
Adds a CodeCompleteOption to folds together compatible function/method overloads
into a single item. This feels pretty good (for editors with signatureHelp
support), but has limitations.
This happens in the code completion merge step, so there may be inconsistencies
(e.g. if only one overload made it into the index result list, no folding).
We don't want to bundle together completions that have different side-effects
(include insertion), because we can't constructo a coherent CompletionItem.
This may be confusing for users, as the reason for non-bundling may not
be immediately obvious. (Also, the implementation seems a little fragile)
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47957
llvm-svn: 334822
Summary:
Also move unittest: URI scheme to TestFS so that it can be shared by
different tests.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47935
llvm-svn: 334810
Summary:
This allows dynamic index to have consistent URI schemes with the
static index which can have customized URI schemes, which would make file
proximity scoring based on URIs easier.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47931
llvm-svn: 334809
Summary:
Like the following:
// -------
// =======
// *******
It does not cover all the cases, but those are definitely not very
useful.
Reviewers: sammccall, ioeric, hokein
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48171
llvm-svn: 334807
Summary:
This is a small code change but vastly reduces noise in code completion results.
The intent of allowing this was to let [sc] ~ "strncpy" and [strcpy] ~ "strncpy"
however the benefits for unsegmented names aren't IMO worth the costs.
Test cases should be representative of the changes here.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47950
llvm-svn: 334712
Summary: These have few signals other than being keywords, so the boost is high.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48083
llvm-svn: 334711
ExprMutationAnalyzer is a generally useful helper that can be used in different clang-tidy checks for checking whether a given expression is (potentially) mutated within a statement (typically the enclosing compound statement.) This is a more general and more powerful/accurate version of isOnlyUsedAsConst, which is used in ForRangeCopyCheck, UnnecessaryCopyInitialization.
Patch by Shuai Wang
llvm-svn: 334604
Summary:
Caching is now handled by ClangdLSPServer and hidden behind the
GlobalCompilationDatabase interface. This simplifies ClangdServer.
This change also removes the SkipCache flag from addDocument,
which is now obsolete.
No behavioral changes are intended, the clangd binary still caches the
compile commands on the first read.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: mgorny, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48068
llvm-svn: 334585
Summary: Macros are terribly spammy at the moment and this offers some relief.
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47936
llvm-svn: 334287
Summary:
Now we have most of Sema's code completion signals incorporated in Quality,
which will allow us to give consistent ranking to sema/index results.
Therefore we can/should stop using Sema priority as an explicit signal.
This fixes some issues like namespaces always having a terrible score.
The most important missing signals are:
- Really dumb/rarely useful completions like:
SomeStruct().^SomeStruct
SomeStruct().^operator=
SomeStruct().~SomeStruct()
We already filter out destructors, this patch adds injected names and
operators to that list.
- type matching the expression context.
Ilya has a plan to add this in a way that's compatible with indexes
(design doc should be shared real soon now!)
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47871
llvm-svn: 334192
Summary: Fix a couple of bugs in tests an in Quality to keep tests passing.
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47815
llvm-svn: 334089
Summary:
This signal is considered a relevance rather than a quality signal because it's
dependent on the query (the fact that it's completion, and implicitly the query
context).
This is part of the effort to reduce reliance on Sema priority, so we can have
consistent ranking between Index and Sema results.
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: klimek, ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47762
llvm-svn: 334026
Summary:
This adds more symbols to the index:
- member variables and functions
- enum constants in scoped enums
The code completion behavior should remain intact but workspace symbols should
now provide much more useful symbols.
Other symbols should be considered such as the ones in "main files" (files not
being included) but this can be done separately as this introduces its fair
share of problems.
Signed-off-by: Marc-Andre Laperle <marc-andre.laperle@ericsson.com>
Reviewers: ioeric, sammccall
Reviewed By: ioeric, sammccall
Subscribers: hokein, sammccall, jkorous, klimek, ilya-biryukov, jkorous-apple, ioeric, MaskRay, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44954
llvm-svn: 334017
Summary:
These decls are sometime used as the canonical declarations (e.g. for go-to-def),
which seems to be bad.
- friend decls that are not definitions should be ignored for indexing purposes
- this means they should never be selected as canonical decl
- if the friend decl is the only decl, then the symbol should not be indexed
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: mgorny, klimek, ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47623
llvm-svn: 333885
Simon Marchi