LoadCommandInfo was needed to keep a command and its offset in the file. Now
that we always have a pointer to the command, we don't need the offset.
llvm-svn: 178991
The fix for PR14972 in r177055 introduced a real think-o in the *store*
side, likely because I was much more focused on the load side. While we
can arbitrarily widen (or narrow) a loaded value, we can't arbitrarily
widen a value to be stored, as that changes the width of memory access!
Lock down the code path in the store rewriting which would do this to
only handle the intended circumstance.
All of the existing tests continue to pass, and I've added a test from
the PR.
llvm-svn: 178974
a relocation across sections. Do this for DW_AT_stmt list in the
skeleton CU and check the relocations in the debug_info section.
Add a FIXME for multiple CUs.
llvm-svn: 178969
Integer return values are sign or zero extended by the callee, and
structs up to 32 bytes in size can be returned in registers.
The CC_Sparc64 CallingConv definition is shared between
LowerFormalArguments_64 and LowerReturn_64. Function arguments and
return values are passed in the same registers.
The inreg flag is also used for return values. This is required to handle
C functions returning structs containing floats and ints:
struct ifp {
int i;
float f;
};
struct ifp f(void);
LLVM IR:
define inreg { i32, float } @f() {
...
ret { i32, float } %retval
}
The ABI requires that %retval.i is returned in the high bits of %i0
while %retval.f goes in %f1.
Without the inreg return value attribute, %retval.i would go in %i0 and
%retval.f would go in %f3 which is a more efficient way of returning
%multiple values, but it is not ABI compliant for returning C structs.
llvm-svn: 178966
64-bit SPARC v9 processes use biased stack and frame pointers, so the
current function's stack frame is located at %sp+BIAS .. %fp+BIAS where
BIAS = 2047.
This makes more local variables directly accessible via [%fp+simm13]
addressing.
llvm-svn: 178965
There are certain PPC instructions into which we can fold a zero immediate
operand. We can detect such cases by looking at the register class required
by the using operand (so long as it is not otherwise constrained).
llvm-svn: 178961
This comment documents the current behavior of the ARM implementation of this
callback, and also the soon-to-be-committed PPC version.
llvm-svn: 178959
All arguments are formally assigned to stack positions and then promoted
to floating point and integer registers. Since there are more floating
point registers than integer registers, this can cause situations where
floating point arguments are assigned to registers after integer
arguments that where assigned to the stack.
Use the inreg flag to indicate 32-bit fragments of structs containing
both float and int members.
The three-way shadowing between stack, integer, and floating point
registers requires custom argument lowering. The good news is that
return values are passed in the exact same way, and we can share the
code.
Still missing:
- Update LowerReturn to handle structs returned in registers.
- LowerCall.
- Variadic functions.
llvm-svn: 178958
if we have an updated task_info call available; else fall back to getting
the default host-wide page size.
Update all uses of the vm page size to get it via MachVMMemory::PageSize().
<rdar://problem/13477763>, <rdar://problem/13498504>
llvm-svn: 178953
linkage specification, and is marked as __attribute__((used)), try to also give
it the unmangled name (by emitting an internal linkage alias) if nothing else
within the translation unit would use that name. This allows inline asm in that
translation unit to use the entity via its unmangled name, which people
apparently rely on.
llvm-svn: 178950
This is important because sometimes two nodes are identical, except the
second one is a sink.
This bug has probably been around for a while, but it wouldn't have been an
issue in the old report graph algorithm. I'm ashamed to say I actually looked
at this the first time around and thought it would never be a problem...and
then didn't include an assertion to back that up.
PR15684
llvm-svn: 178944
New rule:
- Method decls in @implementation are considered "redeclarations"
and inherit deprecated/availability from the @interface.
- All other cases are consider overrides, which do not inherit
deprecated/availability. For example:
(a) @interface redeclares a method in an adopted protocol.
(b) A subclass redeclares a method in a superclass.
(c) A protocol redeclares a method from another protocol it adopts.
The idea is that API authors should have the ability to easily
move availability/deprecated up and down a class/protocol hierarchy.
A redeclaration means that the availability/deprecation is a blank
slate.
Fixes <rdar://problem/13574571>
llvm-svn: 178937
Rafael Espindola