New rule:
- Method decls in @implementation are considered "redeclarations"
and inherit deprecated/availability from the @interface.
- All other cases are consider overrides, which do not inherit
deprecated/availability. For example:
(a) @interface redeclares a method in an adopted protocol.
(b) A subclass redeclares a method in a superclass.
(c) A protocol redeclares a method from another protocol it adopts.
The idea is that API authors should have the ability to easily
move availability/deprecated up and down a class/protocol hierarchy.
A redeclaration means that the availability/deprecation is a blank
slate.
Fixes <rdar://problem/13574571>
llvm-svn: 178937
This removes a bit of patching that survived r178663. Without it we can produce
better a better error message for
const int a = 5;
static const int a;
llvm-svn: 178795
Having these not be the same makes an easy to misuse API. We should audit the
uses and probably rename to something like
foo->hasExternalLinkage():
The c++ standard one. That is UniqueExternalLinkage or ExternalLinkage.
foo->hasUniqueExternalLinkage():
Is UniqueExternalLinkage.
foo->hasCogeGenExternalLinkage():
Is ExternalLinkage.
llvm-svn: 178768
This mostly reverts 178733, but keeps the tests.
I don't claim to understand how hidden sub modules work or when we need to see
them (is that documented?), but this has the same semantics and avoids adding
hasExternalLinkageUncached which has the same foot gun potential as the old
hasExternalLinkage.
Last but not least, not computing linkage when it is not needed is more
efficient.
llvm-svn: 178739
This test was exactly the opposite of what it should be. We should check if
there old decl has linkage (where it makes sense) and if the new decl has
the extern keyword.
llvm-svn: 178735
caching the linkage for a declaration before we set up its redeclaration chain,
when determining whether a declaration could be a redeclaration of something
from an unimported submodule. We actually want to look at the declaration as if
it were not a redeclaration here, so compute the linkage but don't cache it.
llvm-svn: 178733
of a property just in case the property's getter happens to be +1.
We won't synthesize a getter for such a property, but we will allow
the user to define a +1 method for it.
rdar://13115896
llvm-svn: 178731
Normal name lookup ignores any hidden declarations. When name lookup
for builtin declarations fails, we just synthesize a new
declaration at the point of use. With modules, this could lead to
multiple declarations of the same builtin, if one came from a (hidden)
submodule that was later made visible. Teach name lookup to always
find builtin names, so we don't create these redundant declarations in
the first place.
llvm-svn: 178711
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-darwin10-gdb went back green
before it processed the reverted 178663, so it could not have been the culprit.
Revert "Revert 178663."
This reverts commit 4f8a3eb2ce5d4ba422483439e20c8cbb4d953a41.
llvm-svn: 178682
smarts so that it doesn't approve of keywords and/or type names when it
knows (based on its flags) that those kinds of corrections are not
wanted.
llvm-svn: 178668
For variables and functions clang used to store two storage classes. The one
"as written" in the code and a patched one, which, for example, propagates
static to the following decls.
This apparently is from the days clang lacked linkage computation. It is now
redundant and this patch removes it.
llvm-svn: 178663
Doxygen treats "@command" the same as "\command" in a doc comment, so
whenever we talk about Objective-C things like "@interface" we have to
make sure to escape them.
Let's try to keep Clang -Wdocumentation-clean!
llvm-svn: 178603
overriding a non-deleted virtual function. The existing check for this doesn't
catch this case, because it fires before we mark the method as deleted.
llvm-svn: 178563
variable in a C99 inline (but not static-inline or extern-inline)
function definition.
The standard doesn't actually say that this doesn't apply to
"extern inline" definitions, but that seems like a useful extension,
and it at least doesn't have the obvious flaw that a static
mutable variable in an externally-available definition does.
rdar://13535367
llvm-svn: 178520
visible. There's a lot of potential badness in how we're modelling
these things, but getting this much correct is reasonably easy.
rdar://13535367
llvm-svn: 178488
When using modules we should not ignore overridden methods from
categories that are hidden because the module is not visible.
This will give more consistent results (when imports change) and it's more
correct since the methods are indeed overridden even if they are not "visible"
for lookup purposes.
rdar://13350796
llvm-svn: 178374
We already avoided warning for
extern "C" const char *Version_string = "2.9";
now we also don't produce any warnings for
extern "C" {
extern const char *Version_string2 = "2.9";
}
llvm-svn: 178333
'isa' ivar is accessed provided it is the first
ivar. Fixit hint will follow in another patch.
This is continuation of // rdar://13503456
llvm-svn: 178313
Summary:
This also relaxes the requirement on Windows that the member pointer
class type be a complete type (http://llvm.org/PR12070). We still ask
for a complete type to instantiate any templates (MSVC does this), but
if that fails we continue as normal, relying on any inheritance
attributes on the declaration.
Reviewers: rjmccall
CC: triton, timurrrr, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D568
llvm-svn: 178283
The suggestion was already in the text of the note; this just adds the
actual fixit and the appropriate test cases.
Patch by Alexander Zinenko!
llvm-svn: 178274
likely be implicitly truncated:
* All forms of Bitwise-and, bitwise-or, and integer multiplication.
* The assignment form of integer addition, subtraction, and exclusive-or
* The RHS of the comma operator
* The LHS of left shifts.
llvm-svn: 178273
DeLesley Hutchins