If code is compiled for X86 without SSE support, the register save area
doesn't contain FPU registers, so `AMD64FpEndOffset` should be equal to
`AMD64GpEndOffset`.
llvm-svn: 339414
It turns out that postThunkContents() is only used for
sorting symbols in .symtab.
Though we can instead move the logic to SymbolTableBaseSection::finalizeContents(),
postpone calling it and then get rid of postThunkContents completely.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49547
llvm-svn: 339413
We have a crash issue when handling the empty -defsym.
For parsing this option we are using ScriptParser class which is used
generally for reading the linker script. For empty defsym case, we
pass the empty memory buffer and crash in the place removed in https://reviews.llvm.org/rL336436.
But reverting of the above patch would not help here (we would still crash but a bit later). And
even after fixing the crash we would report something like
"lld.exe: error: -defsym:1: unexpected EOF"
It is probably not the appropriate message because mentions EOF.
I think the issue should be handled on a higher level like this patch does.
So we do not want to pass the empty memory buffer first of all I believe.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50498
llvm-svn: 339412
MemorySSA currently creates MemoryAccesses for lifetime intrinsics, and
sometimes treats them as clobbers. This may/may not be the best way
forward, but while we're doing it, we should consider
MayAlias/PartialAlias to be clobbers.
The ideal fix here is probably to remove all of this reasoning about
lifetimes from MemorySSA + put it into the passes that need to care. But
that's a wayyy broader fix that needs some consensus, and we have
miscompiles + a release branch today, and this should solve the
miscompiles just as well.
differential revision is D43269. Landing without an explicit LGTM (and
without using the special please-autoclose-this syntax) so we can still
use that revision as a place to decide what the right fix here is.
llvm-svn: 339411
r339380 changed the trailing types of ParsedAttr to use llvm::TrailingObjects.
However, it did not copy over one of the size attributes, causing a too
small allocation for this object. The error was detected with
AddressSanitizer use-after-poison
llvm-svn: 339409
This reverts commit r339405, it's failing on Darwin buildbots because
it doesn't seem to have a tgkill/thr_kill2 interface. It has a
__pthread_kill() syscall, but that relies on having a handle to the
thread's port which is not equivalent to it's tid.
llvm-svn: 339408
Summary:
i64x2 and f64x2 operations are not implemented in V8, so we normally
do not want to emit them. However, they are in the SIMD spec proposal,
so we still want to be able to test them in the toolchain. This patch
adds a flag to enable their emission.
Reviewers: aheejin, dschuff
Subscribers: sunfish, jgravelle-google, sbc100, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50423
Patch by Thomas Lively (tlively)
llvm-svn: 339407
Summary:
glibc can call SafeStack instrumented code even after the last pthread
data destructor has run. Delay cleaning-up unsafe stacks for threads
until the thread is dead by having future threads clean-up prior threads
stacks.
Reviewers: pcc, eugenis
Reviewed By: eugenis
Subscribers: cryptoad, eugenis, kubamracek, delcypher, llvm-commits, #sanitizers, kcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50406
llvm-svn: 339405
Summary:
Case case of the switch statement here makes the same call, but it is
already done at the start of the function.
Reviewers: rsmith, dblaikie
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50409
llvm-svn: 339402
Summary:
gcc does not like
const Region *Region;
It wants a different name for the variable.
Is there a better convention for what name to use in such a case?
Reviewers: sbc100, aheejin
Subscribers: aheejin, jgravelle-google, dschuff, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50472
Patch by Alon Zakai (kripken)
llvm-svn: 339398
Summary:
The TType encoding, LSDA encoding, and personality encoding are all
passed explicitly by CodeGen to the assembler through .cfi_* directives,
so only the AsmPrinter needs to know about them.
The FDE CFI encoding however, controls the encoding of the label
implicitly created by the .cfi_startproc directive. That directive seems
to be special in that it doesn't take an encoding, so the assembler just
has to know how to encode one DSO-local label reference from .eh_frame
to .text.
As a result, it looks like MC will continue to have to know when the
large code model is in use. Perhaps we could invent a '.cfi_startproc
[large]' flag so that this knowledge doesn't need to pollute the
assembler.
Reviewers: davide, lliu0, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: hiraditya, fedor.sergeev, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50533
llvm-svn: 339397
This patch cleans up unused functions, variables, sign compare issues, and
addresses some -Warning flags which are now enabled including -Wcast-qual.
Not all the warning flags in LibompHandleFlags.cmake are enabled, but some
are with this patch.
Some __kmp_gtid_from_* macros in kmp.h are switched to static inline functions
which allows us to remove the awkward definition of KMP_DEBUG_ASSERT() and
KMP_ASSERT() macros which used the comma operator. This had to be done for the
innumerable -Wunused-value warnings related to KMP_DEBUG_ASSERT()
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49105
llvm-svn: 339393
Summary: Edited `loop_proto_to_llvm` to emit metadata at the end of the generated IR. This metadata will increase the vector width when the IR is optimized.
Reviewers: morehouse, kcc
Reviewed By: morehouse
Subscribers: cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50530
llvm-svn: 339392
This makes the code easier to read and will make an upcoming patch I have easier to review because that patch needed this refactoring to reuse some of the functions.
llvm-svn: 339391
As sent on cfe-commits:
"You need to use "friend TrailingObjects;" here, not
"friend class TrailingObjects;", to avoid breaking MSVC
(which doesn't implement injected-class-names quite according to spec)."
llvm-svn: 339389
As suggested in the post-commit review for D50531,
change from the templatized TrailingObjects friend declaration
to a version referring to the base.
llvm-svn: 339382
ParsedAttr is using a hand-rolled trailing-objects
implementation that gets cleaned up quite a bit by
just using llvm::TrailingObjects. This is a large
TrailingObjects list, but most things are length '0'.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50531
llvm-svn: 339380
The motivating case is an otherwise dead loop with a fence in it. At the moment, this goes all the way through the optimizer and we end up emitting an entirely pointless loop on x86. This case may seem a bit contrived, but we've seen it in real code as the result of otherwise reasonable lowering strategies combined w/thread local memory optimizations (such as escape analysis).
To handle this simple case, we can teach LICM to hoist must execute fences when there is no other memory operation within the loop.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50489
llvm-svn: 339378
Summary:
When compiling with WERROR=ON, a new fatal warning started popping up recently
(due to -Werror,-Winline-asm):
```
.../lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux.cc:1214:24: error: inline asm clobber list contains reserved registers: RSP [-Werror,-Winline-asm]
"syscall\n"
^
<inline asm>:1:1: note: instantiated into assembly here
syscall
^
.../lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux.cc:1214:24: note: Reserved registers on the clobber list may not be preserved across the asm statement, and clobbering them may lead to undefined behaviour.
"syscall\n"
^
<inline asm>:1:1: note: instantiated into assembly here
syscall
^
```
Removing `rsp` from the clobber list makes the warning go away, and does not
appear to have a functional impact. If there is another way to solve this, let
me know.
Reviewers: eugenis, vitalybuka
Reviewed By: eugenis
Subscribers: kubamracek, delcypher, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50519
llvm-svn: 339370