Currently each Function points to a DISubprogram and DISubprogram has a
scope field. For member functions the scope is a DICompositeType. DIScopes
point to the DICompileUnit to facilitate type uniquing.
Distinct DISubprograms (with isDefinition: true) are not part of the type
hierarchy and cannot be uniqued. This change removes the subprograms
list from DICompileUnit and instead adds a pointer to the owning compile
unit to distinct DISubprograms. This would make it easy for ThinLTO to
strip unneeded DISubprograms and their transitively referenced debug info.
Motivation
----------
Materializing DISubprograms is currently the most expensive operation when
doing a ThinLTO build of clang.
We want the DISubprogram to be stored in a separate Bitcode block (or the
same block as the function body) so we can avoid having to expensively
deserialize all DISubprograms together with the global metadata. If a
function has been inlined into another subprogram we need to store a
reference the block containing the inlined subprogram.
Attached to https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27284 is a python script
that updates LLVM IR testcases to the new format.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19034
<rdar://problem/25256815>
llvm-svn: 266446
Summary:
First up is instcombine, where in the dbg.declare -> dbg.value conversion,
the llvm.dbg.value needs to be called on the actual loaded value, rather
than the address (since the whole point of this transformation is to be
able to get rid of the alloca). Further, now that that's cleaned up, we
can remove a hack in the backend, that would add an implicit OP_deref if
the argument to dbg.value was an alloca. This stems from before the
existence of DIExpression and is no longer necessary since the deref can
be expressed explicitly.
Now, in order to make sure that the tests pass with this change, we need to
correct the printing of DEBUG_VALUE comments to take into account the
expression, which wasn't taken into account before.
Unfortunately, for both these changes, there were a number of incorrect
test cases (mostly the wrong number of DW_OP_derefs, but also a couple
where the test itself was broken more badly). aprantl and I have gone
through and adjusted these test case in order to make them pass with
these fixes and in some cases to make sure they're actually testing
what they are meant to test.
Reviewers: aprantl
Subscribers: dsanders
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14186
llvm-svn: 256077
Adrian Prantl