Commit Graph

82 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sanjoy Das 56df0ec610 [InstCombine] Fix incorrect rule from rL236202
The rule for SMIN introduced in rL236202 doesn't work as advertised: the
check for Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT was missing.

llvm-svn: 264996
2016-03-31 05:14:34 +00:00
Artur Pilipenko f84dc06e5b Push isDereferenceableAndAlignedPointer down into isSafeToLoadUnconditionally
Reviewed By: reames

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16226

llvm-svn: 258010
2016-01-17 12:35:29 +00:00
Artur Pilipenko 0e21d54b51 Take alignment into account in isSafeToLoadUnconditionally
Reviewed By: hfinkel

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10475

llvm-svn: 240636
2015-06-25 12:18:43 +00:00
Philip Reames c25df11614 Reapply 239795 - [InstCombine] Propagate non-null facts to call parameters
The original change broke clang side tests.  I will be submitting those momentarily.  This change includes post commit feedback on the original change from from Pete Cooper.

Original Submission comments:
If a parameter to a function is known non-null, use the existing parameter attributes to record that fact at the call site. This has no optimization benefit by itself - that I know of - but is an enabling change for http://reviews.llvm.org/D9129.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9132

llvm-svn: 239849
2015-06-16 20:24:25 +00:00
Philip Reames 1a6305f313 Revert 239795
I forgot to update some clang test cases.  I'll fix and resubmit tomorrow.

llvm-svn: 239800
2015-06-16 01:20:53 +00:00
Philip Reames dfc29fba60 [InstCombine] Propagate non-null facts to call parameters
If a parameter to a function is known non-null, use the existing parameter attributes to record that fact at the call site. This has no optimization benefit by itself - that I know of - but is an enabling change for http://reviews.llvm.org/D9129.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9132

llvm-svn: 239795
2015-06-16 00:43:54 +00:00
David Majnemer 468f670021 [InstCombine] Don't miscompile select to poison
If we have (select a, b, c), it is sometimes valid to simplify this to a
single select operand.  However, doing so is only valid if the
computation doesn't inject poison into the computation.

It might be helpful to consider the following example:
  (select (icmp ne %i, INT_MAX), (add nsw %i, 1), INT_MIN)

The select is equivalent to (add %i, 1) but not (add nsw %i, 1).

Self hosting on x86_64 revealed that this occurs very, very rarely so
bailing out is hopefully pretty reasonable.

llvm-svn: 239215
2015-06-06 02:30:43 +00:00
Renato Golin 3dabb23384 Revert "[InstCombine] Rephrase fix to SimplifyWithOpReplaced"
This reverts commit r239141. This commit was an attempt to reintroduce
a previous patch that broke many self-hosting bots with clang timeouts,
but it still has slowdown issues, at least  on ARM, increasing the
compilation time (stage 2, clang's) by 5x.

llvm-svn: 239175
2015-06-05 18:24:12 +00:00
David Majnemer 6d8081835d [InstCombine] Rephrase fix to SimplifyWithOpReplaced
I don't have the IR which is causing the build bot breakage but I can
postulate as to why they are timing out:
1. SimplifyWithOpReplaced was stripping flags from the simplified value.
2. visitSelectInstWithICmp was overriding SimplifyWithOpReplaced because
   it's simplification wasn't correct.
3. InstCombine would revisit the add instruction and note that it can
   rederive the flags.
4. By modifying the value, we chose to revisit instructions which reuse
   the value.  One of the instructions is the original select, causing
   LLVM to never reach fixpoint.

Instead, strip the flags only when we are sure we are going to perform
the simplification.

llvm-svn: 239141
2015-06-05 09:57:57 +00:00
Daniel Jasper 917fa5ee66 Revert "[InstCombine] Don't miscompile safe increment idiom"
This is breaking a lot of build bots and is causing very long-running
compiles (infinite loops)?

Likely, we shouldn't return nullptr?

llvm-svn: 239139
2015-06-05 09:31:20 +00:00
David Majnemer 00f7d9ecc8 [InstCombine] Don't miscompile safe increment idiom
We cleverly handle cases where computation done in one argument of a select
instruction is suitable for the other operand, thus obviating the need
of the select and the comparison.  However, the other operand cannot
have flags.

This fixes PR23757.

llvm-svn: 239115
2015-06-04 23:11:30 +00:00
Sanjoy Das a8c178f280 [InstCombine] Add a new formula for SMIN.
Summary:
After this change `MatchSelectPattern` recognizes the following form
of SMIN:

  Y >s C ? ~Y : ~C == ~Y <s ~C ? ~Y : ~C = SMIN(~Y, ~C)

Reviewers: majnemer

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9352

llvm-svn: 236202
2015-04-30 04:56:00 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith 49e6a70fe3 Verifier: Call verifyModule() from llc and opt
Change `llc` and `opt` to run `verifyModule()`.  This ensures that we
check the full module before `FunctionPass::doInitialization()` ever
gets called (I was getting crashes in `DwarfDebug` instead of verifier
failures when testing a WIP patch that checks operands of compile
units).  In `opt`, also move up debug-info-stripping so that it still
runs before verification.

There was a fair bit of broken code that was sitting in tree.
Interestingly, some were cases of a `select` that referred to itself in
`-instcombine` tests (apparently an intermediate result).  I split them
off to `*-noverify.ll` tests with RUN lines like this:

    opt < %s -S -disable-verify -instcombine | opt -S | FileCheck %s

This avoids verifying the input file (so we can get the broken code into
`-instcombine), but still verifies the output with a second call to
`opt` (to verify that `-instcombine` will clean it up like it should).

llvm-svn: 233432
2015-03-27 22:04:28 +00:00
David Blaikie a79ac14fa6 [opaque pointer type] Add textual IR support for explicit type parameter to load instruction
Essentially the same as the GEP change in r230786.

A similar migration script can be used to update test cases, though a few more
test case improvements/changes were required this time around: (r229269-r229278)

import fileinput
import sys
import re

pat = re.compile(r"((?:=|:|^)\s*load (?:atomic )?(?:volatile )?(.*?))(| addrspace\(\d+\) *)\*($| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$)")

for line in sys.stdin:
  sys.stdout.write(re.sub(pat, r"\1, \2\3*\4", line))

Reviewers: rafael, dexonsmith, grosser

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7649

llvm-svn: 230794
2015-02-27 21:17:42 +00:00
Matthias Braun 2e404597f4 InstCombine: Combine select sequences into a single select
Normalize
select(C0, select(C1, a, b), b) -> select((C0 & C1), a, b)
select(C0, a, select(C1, a, b)) -> select((C0 | C1), a, b)

This normal form may enable further combines on the And/Or and shortens
paths for the values. Many targets prefer the other but can go back
easily in CodeGen.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7399

llvm-svn: 228409
2015-02-06 17:49:36 +00:00
Philip Reames 5ad26c353c Loading from null is valid outside of addrspace 0
This patches fixes a miscompile where we were assuming that loading from null is undefined and thus we could assume it doesn't happen.  This transform is perfectly legal in address space 0, but is not neccessarily legal in other address spaces.

We really should introduce a hook to control this property on a per target per address space basis.  We may be loosing valuable optimizations in some address spaces by being too conservative.

Original patch by Thomas P Raoux (submitted to llvm-commits), tests and formatting fixes by me.

llvm-svn: 224961
2014-12-29 22:46:21 +00:00
David Majnemer 6eed0e0d20 This should have been part of r224676.
llvm-svn: 224677
2014-12-20 04:48:34 +00:00
David Majnemer b0362e4ee6 InstCombine: Squash an icmp+select into bitwise arithmetic
(X & INT_MIN) == 0 ? X ^ INT_MIN : X  into  X | INT_MIN
(X & INT_MIN) != 0 ? X ^ INT_MIN : X  into  X & INT_MAX

This fixes PR21993.

llvm-svn: 224676
2014-12-20 04:45:35 +00:00
David Majnemer 40157d5c4d InstCombine: Restore optimizations lost in r210006
This restores our ability to optimize:
(X & C) == 0 ? X ^ C : X  into  X | C
(X & C) != 0 ? X ^ C : X  into  X & ~C

llvm-svn: 222871
2014-11-27 07:25:21 +00:00
David Majnemer c6a5e1dd4f InstSimplify: Restore optimizations lost in r210006
This restores our ability to optimize:
(X & C) ? X & ~C : X  into  X & ~C
(X & C) ? X : X & ~C  into  X
(X & C) ? X | C : X  into  X
(X & C) ? X : X | C  into  X | C

llvm-svn: 222868
2014-11-27 06:32:46 +00:00
David Majnemer 5468e86469 Revert "Added inst combine transforms for single bit tests from Chris's note"
This reverts commit r210006, it miscompiled libapr which is used in who
knows how many projects.

A test has been added to ensure that we don't regress again.

I'll work on a rewrite of what the optimization was trying to do later.

llvm-svn: 222856
2014-11-26 23:00:38 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 816d26fe5e [InstCombine] Change LLVM To canonicalize toward the value type being
stored rather than the pointer type.

This change is analogous to r220138 which changed the canonicalization
for loads. The rationale is the same: memory does not have a type,
operations (and thus the values they produce) have a type. We should
match that type as closely as possible rather than reading some form of
semantics into the pointer type.

With this change, loads and stores should no longer be made with
nonsensical types for the values that tehy load and store. This is
particularly important when trying to match specific loaded and stored
types in the process of doing other instcombines, which is what led me
down this twisty maze of miscanonicalization.

I've put quite some effort into looking through IR to find places where
LLVM's optimizer was being unreasonably conservative in the face of
mismatched load and store types, however it is possible (let's say,
likely!) I have missed some. If you see regressions here, or from
r220138, the likely cause is some part of LLVM failing to cope with load
and store types differing. Test cases appreciated, it is important that
we root all of these out of LLVM.

llvm-svn: 222748
2014-11-25 10:09:51 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 1a3c2c414c Revert r220349 to re-instate r220277 with a fix for PR21330 -- quite
clearly only exactly equal width ptrtoint and inttoptr casts are no-op
casts, it says so right there in the langref. Make the code agree.

Original log from r220277:
Teach the load analysis to allow finding available values which require
inttoptr or ptrtoint cast provided there is datalayout available.
Eventually, the datalayout can just be required but in practice it will
always be there today.

To go with the ability to expose available values requiring a ptrtoint
or inttoptr cast, helpers are added to perform one of these three casts.

These smarts are necessary to finish canonicalizing loads and stores to
the operational type requirements without regressing fundamental
combines.

I've added some test cases. These should actually improve as the load
combining and store combining improves, but they may fundamentally be
highlighting some missing combines for select in addition to exercising
the specific added logic to load analysis.

llvm-svn: 222739
2014-11-25 08:20:27 +00:00
Hans Wennborg 0b39fc0d16 Revert "Teach the load analysis to allow finding available values which require" (r220277)
This seems to have caused PR21330.

llvm-svn: 220349
2014-10-21 23:49:52 +00:00
Chandler Carruth aa72a6dd3b Teach the load analysis to allow finding available values which require
inttoptr or ptrtoint cast provided there is datalayout available.
Eventually, the datalayout can just be required but in practice it will
always be there today.

To go with the ability to expose available values requiring a ptrtoint
or inttoptr cast, helpers are added to perform one of these three casts.

These smarts are necessary to finish canonicalizing loads and stores to
the operational type requirements without regressing fundamental
combines.

I've added some test cases. These should actually improve as the load
combining and store combining improves, but they may fundamentally be
highlighting some missing combines for select in addition to exercising
the specific added logic to load analysis.

llvm-svn: 220277
2014-10-21 09:00:40 +00:00
Chandler Carruth eeec35ae1c Teach the load analysis driving core instcombine logic and other bits of
logic to look through pointer casts, making them trivially stronger in
the face of loads and stores with intervening pointer casts.

I've included a few test cases that demonstrate the kind of folding
instcombine can do without pointer casts and then variations which
obfuscate the logic through bitcasts. Without this patch, the variations
all fail to optimize fully.

This is more important now than it has been in the past as I've started
moving the load canonicialization to more closely follow the value type
requirements rather than the pointer type requirements and thus this
needs to be prepared for more pointer casts. When I made the same change
to stores several test cases regressed without logic along these lines
so I wanted to systematically improve matters first.

llvm-svn: 220178
2014-10-20 00:24:14 +00:00
Chandler Carruth b5f4c32830 Add a datalayout string to this test so that it exercises the full gamut
of InstCombine rather than just the bits enabled when datalayout is
optional.

The primary fixes here are because now things are little endian.

In good news, silliness like this seems like it will be going away as
we've got pretty stong consensus on dropping optional datalayout
entirely.

llvm-svn: 220176
2014-10-20 00:11:31 +00:00
Chandler Carruth a801dd5799 Fix a long-standing miscompile in the load analysis that was uncovered
by my refactoring of this code.

The method isSafeToLoadUnconditionally assumes that the load will
proceed with the preferred type alignment. Given that, it has to ensure
that the alloca or global is at least that aligned. It has always done
this historically when a datalayout is present, but has never checked it
when the datalayout is absent. When I refactored the code in r220156,
I exposed this path when datalayout was present and that turned the
latent bug into a patent bug.

This fixes the issue by just removing the special case which allows
folding things without datalayout. This isn't worth the complexity of
trying to tease apart when it is or isn't safe without actually knowing
the preferred alignment.

llvm-svn: 220161
2014-10-19 08:17:50 +00:00
Jingyue Wu 33bd53df7f [InstCombine] mark ADD with nuw if no unsigned overflow
Summary:
As a starting step, we only use one simple heuristic: if the sign bits
of both a and b are zero, we can prove "add a, b" do not unsigned
overflow, and thus convert it to "add nuw a, b".

Updated all affected tests and added two new tests (@zero_sign_bit and
@zero_sign_bit2) in AddOverflow.ll

Test Plan: make check-all

Reviewers: eliben, rafael, meheff, chandlerc

Reviewed By: chandlerc

Subscribers: chandlerc, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4144

llvm-svn: 211084
2014-06-17 00:42:07 +00:00
Rafael Espindola d1a2c2d905 Add back commit r210029.
The code was actually correct. Sorry for the confusion. I have expanded the
comment saying why the analysis is valid to avoid me misunderstaning it
again in the future.

llvm-svn: 210052
2014-06-02 22:01:04 +00:00
Rafael Espindola 582c890fbe Revert "Add the nsw flag when we detect that an add will not signed overflow."
This reverts commit r210029.

It was not correctly handling cases where LHS and RHS had multiple but different
sign bits.

llvm-svn: 210048
2014-06-02 21:12:19 +00:00
Rafael Espindola 82899febf0 Add the nsw flag when we detect that an add will not signed overflow.
We already had a function for checking this, we were just using it only in
specialized cases.

llvm-svn: 210029
2014-06-02 14:32:58 +00:00
Dinesh Dwivedi 43e127bded Added inst combine transforms for single bit tests from Chris's note
if ((x & C) == 0) x |= C becomes x |= C
if ((x & C) != 0) x ^= C becomes x &= ~C
if ((x & C) == 0) x ^= C becomes x |= C
if ((x & C) != 0) x &= ~C becomes x &= ~C
if ((x & C) == 0) x &= ~C becomes nothing

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3777

llvm-svn: 210006
2014-06-02 07:24:36 +00:00
Dinesh Dwivedi f82f16e3e6 Added inst-combine for 'MIN(MIN(A, 97), 23)' and 'MAX(MAX(A, 23), 97)'
This removes TODO added in r208849 [http://reviews.llvm.org/D3629]

MIN(MIN(A, 97), 23) -> MIN(A, 23)
MAX(MAX(A, 23), 97) -> MAX(A, 97)

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3785

llvm-svn: 209110
2014-05-19 07:08:32 +00:00
Dinesh Dwivedi 83c11da849 Reverting r208848, reason: build failure: sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/builds/3399
llvm-svn: 208852
2014-05-15 08:22:55 +00:00
Dinesh Dwivedi f675f4201b Added instcombine for 'MIN(MIN(A, 27), 93)' and 'MAX(MAX(A, 93), 27)'
MIN(MIN(A, 23), 97) -> MIN(A, 23)
MAX(MAX(A, 97), 23) -> MAX(A, 97)

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3629

llvm-svn: 208849
2014-05-15 06:13:40 +00:00
Dinesh Dwivedi 837c16097e Added inst combine transforms for single bit tests from Chris's note
if ((x & C) == 0) x |= C becomes x |= C
if ((x & C) != 0) x ^= C becomes x &= ~C
if ((x & C) == 0) x ^= C becomes x |= C
if ((x & C) != 0) x &= ~C becomes x &= ~C
if ((x & C) == 0) x &= ~C becomes nothing

Z3 Verifications code for above transform
http://rise4fun.com/Z3/Pmsh

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3717

llvm-svn: 208848
2014-05-15 06:01:33 +00:00
Justin Bogner 4a9ac8cd75 InstCombine: Only foldSelectICmpAndOr for integer types
Currently foldSelectICmpAndOr asserts if the "or" involves a vector
containing several of the same power of two. We can easily avoid this by
only performing the fold on integer types, like foldSelectICmpAnd does.

Fixes <rdar://problem/15012516>

llvm-svn: 191552
2013-09-27 20:35:39 +00:00
Stephen Lin c1c7a1309c Update Transforms tests to use CHECK-LABEL for easier debugging. No functionality change.
This update was done with the following bash script:

  find test/Transforms -name "*.ll" | \
  while read NAME; do
    echo "$NAME"
    if ! grep -q "^; *RUN: *llc" $NAME; then
      TEMP=`mktemp -t temp`
      cp $NAME $TEMP
      sed -n "s/^define [^@]*@\([A-Za-z0-9_]*\)(.*$/\1/p" < $NAME | \
      while read FUNC; do
        sed -i '' "s/;\(.*\)\([A-Za-z0-9_]*\):\( *\)@$FUNC\([( ]*\)\$/;\1\2-LABEL:\3@$FUNC(/g" $TEMP
      done
      mv $TEMP $NAME
    fi
  done

llvm-svn: 186268
2013-07-14 01:42:54 +00:00
Benjamin Kramer 4093f29366 InstCombine: Also turn selects fed by an and into arithmetic when the types don't match.
Inserting a zext or trunc is sufficient. This pattern is somewhat common in
LLVM's pointer mangling code.

llvm-svn: 185270
2013-06-29 21:17:04 +00:00
David Majnemer a18dfe6b96 Add a test for the foldSelectICmpAndOr fix committed in r180779.
This tests a case where C1 and C2 were the same but X and Y were different
widths.

llvm-svn: 180907
2013-05-02 02:44:23 +00:00
David Majnemer 8d048d0482 Fix "Combine bit test + conditional or into simple math"
This fixes the optimization introduced in r179748 and reverted in r179750.

While the optimization was sound, it did not properly respect differences in
bit-width.

llvm-svn: 180777
2013-04-30 08:57:58 +00:00
David Majnemer 81af06e003 Revert "Combine bit test + conditional or into simple math"
It is causing stage2 builds to fail, let's get them running again.

llvm-svn: 179750
2013-04-18 08:42:33 +00:00
David Majnemer bdf0caf6b1 Combine bit test + conditional or into simple math
Simplify:
(select (icmp eq (and X, C1), 0), Y, (or Y, C2))

Into:
(or (shl (and X, C1), C3), y)

Where:
C3 = Log(C2) - Log(C1)

If:
C1 and C2 are both powers of two

llvm-svn: 179748
2013-04-18 07:30:07 +00:00
Benjamin Kramer f55b592cc8 InstCombine: Fix an edge case where constant icmps could sneak into ConstantFoldInstOperands and crash.
Have to refactor the ConstantFolder interface one day to define bugs like this away. Fixes PR14131.

llvm-svn: 166374
2012-10-20 08:43:52 +00:00
Pete Cooper b33c297f14 Added InstCombine for "select cond, ~cond, x" type patterns
These can be reduced to "~cond & x" or "~cond | x"

llvm-svn: 146624
2011-12-15 00:56:45 +00:00
Nick Lewycky 99fb091f65 Add a new icmp+select optz'n. Also shows off the load(cst) folding added in
r140966.

llvm-svn: 140969
2011-10-02 10:37:37 +00:00
Benjamin Kramer fd53a27f99 ConstantFoldInstOperands doesn't like compares, hand it off to instsimplify instead.
Fixes PR10040.

llvm-svn: 132254
2011-05-28 10:16:58 +00:00
Benjamin Kramer 749ef5f420 InstCombine: Make switch folding with equality compares more aggressive by trying instsimplify on the arm where we know the compared value.
Stuff like "x == y ? y : x&y" now folds into "x&y".

llvm-svn: 132185
2011-05-27 13:00:16 +00:00
Nick Lewycky 8544228d5a Teach the transformation that moves binary operators around selects to preserve
the subclass optional data.

llvm-svn: 128388
2011-03-27 19:51:23 +00:00