WHAT!?!
It turns out that Type::isPromotableIntegerType() was not considering
enumeration types to be promotable, so we would never do the
promotion despite having properly computed the promotion type when the
enum was defined. Various operations on values of enum type just
"worked" because we could still compute the integer rank of an enum
type; the oddity, however, is that operations such as "add an enum and
an unsigned" would often have an enum result type (!). The bug
actually showed up as a spurious -Wformat diagnostic
(<rdar://problem/7595366>), but in theory it could cause miscompiles.
In this commit:
- Enum types with a promotion type of "int" or "unsigned int" are
promotable.
- Tweaked the computation of promotable types for enums
- For all of the ABIs, treat enum types the same way as their
underlying types (*not* their promotion types) for argument passing
and return values
- Extend the ABI tester with support for enumeration types
llvm-svn: 95117
sequences, where we would occasionally determine (incorrectly) that
one standard conversion sequence was a proper subset of another when,
in fact, they contained completely incomparable conversions.
This change records the types in each step within a standard
conversion sequence, so that we can check the specific comparison
types to determine when one sequence is a proper subset of the
other. Fixes this testcase (thanks, Anders!), which was distilled from
PR6095 (also thanks to Anders).
llvm-svn: 94660
This solution relies on an O(n) scan of redeclarations, which means it might
scale poorly in crazy cases with tons of redeclarations brought in by a ton
of distinct associated namespaces. I believe that avoiding this
is not worth the common-case cost.
llvm-svn: 94530
incomplete type (or a pointer/reference to such).
The causes of this problem are different enough to justify a different "design"
for the diagnostic. Most notably, it doesn't give an operand index:
it's usually pretty obvious which operand is the problem, it adds a lot of
clutter to mention it, and the fix is usually in a different part of the file
anyway.
This is yet another diagnostic that should really have an analogue in the
non-overloaded case --- which should be much easier to write because of
the weaker space constraints.
llvm-svn: 94303
conversions. To make this work, fill out all conversions for all candidates
(but only when diagnosing overload failure). Split out a few cases from
ovl_fail_bad_conversion which didn't actually involve a failed argument
conversion.
I'm pretty sure this is not a well-founded ordering, but I'm not sure it matters.
llvm-svn: 94283
Change LookupResult to use UnresolvedSet. Also extract UnresolvedSet into its
own header and make it templated over an inline capacity.
llvm-svn: 93959
to be considering user-defined conversions in the first place.
Doug, please review; I'm not sure what we should be doing if we see a real
ambiguity in selecting a copy constructor when otherwise suppressing
user-defined conversions.
Fixes PR6014.
llvm-svn: 93365
information to feed diagnostics instead of regenerating it. Much room for
improvement here, but fixes some unfortunate problems reporting on method calls.
llvm-svn: 93316
why the candidate is non-viable. There's a lot we can do to improve this, but
it's a good start. Further improvements should probably be integrated with the
bad-initialization reporting routines.
llvm-svn: 93277
I said to myself, self, why don't you go add a couple of parameters to a method
and then fail to use them, and I thought that sounded like a pretty good idea,
so I did it.
llvm-svn: 93233
fidelity with which we note them as functions/constructors and templates
thereof. Also will be helpful when reporting bad conversions (next).
llvm-svn: 93224
sequence. Lots of small relevant changes. Fixes some serious problems with
ambiguous conversions; also possibly improves associated diagnostics.
llvm-svn: 93214
(C++ [temp.mem]p5-6), which involves template argument deduction based
on the type named, e.g., given
struct X { template<typename T> operator T*(); } x;
when we call
x.operator int*();
we perform template argument deduction to determine that T=int. This
template argument deduction is needed for template specialization and
explicit instantiation, e.g.,
template<> X::operator float*() { /* ... */ }
and when calling or otherwise naming a conversion function (as in the
first example).
This fixes PR5742 and PR5762, although there's some remaining ugliness
that's causing out-of-line definitions of conversion function
templates to fail. I'll look into that separately.
llvm-svn: 93162
not just the viable ones. This is reasonable because the most common use of
deleted functions is to exclude some implicit conversion during calls; users
therefore will want to figure out why some other options were excluded.
Started sorting overload results. Right now it just sorts by location in the
translation unit (after putting viable functions first), but we can do better than
that.
Changed bool OnlyViable parameter to PrintOverloadCandidates to an enum for better
self-documentation.
llvm-svn: 92990
no viable overloads. Use a different message when the class provides
no operator[] overloads at all; use it for operator(), too.
Partially addresses PR 5900.
llvm-svn: 92894
typo.cpp:22:10: error: use of undeclared identifier 'radious'; did
you mean 'radius'?
return radious * pi;
^~~~~~~
radius
This was super-easy, since we already had decent recovery by looking
for names in dependent base classes.
llvm-svn: 92341
more or less cv-qualified than another during implicit conversion and overload
resolution ([basic.type.qualifier] p5). Factors the logic out of template
deduction and into the ASTContext so it can be shared.
This fixes several aspects of PR5542, but not all of them.
llvm-svn: 92248
address resolution. This fixes PR5751.
Also, while we're here, remove logic from ADL which mistakenly included the
definition namespaces of overloaded and/or templated functions whose name or
address is used as an argument.
llvm-svn: 92245
Douglas Gregor