The new behavior matches GNU objdump. A pair of angle brackets makes tests slightly easier.
`.foo:` is not unique and thus cannot be used in a `CHECK-LABEL:` directive.
Without `-LABEL`, the CHECK line can match the `Disassembly of section`
line and causes the next `CHECK-NEXT:` to fail.
```
Disassembly of section .foo:
0000000000001634 .foo:
```
Bdragon: <> has metalinguistic connotation. it just "feels right"
Reviewed By: rupprecht
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75713
* Add --no-show-raw-insn to llvm-objdump -d tests
* When linking an executable with %t.so, the path %t.so will be recorded
in the DT_NEEDED entry if %t.so doesn't have DT_SONAME. .dynstr will
have varying lengths on different systems. Add -soname to make tests
more robust.
llvm-svn: 366988
This improves readability and the behavior is consistent with GNU objdump.
The new test test/tools/llvm-objdump/X86/disassemble-section-name.s
checks we print newlines before and after "Disassembly of section ...:"
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61127
llvm-svn: 359668
Also change some options that have different semantics (cause confusion) in llvm-readelf mode:
-s => -S
-t => --symbols
-sd => --section-data
llvm-svn: 359651
This is in preparation for my next change, which will introduce a relro
nobits section. That requires that relro sections appear at the end of the
progbits part of the r/w segment so that the relro nobits section can appear
contiguously.
Because of the amount of churn required in the test suite, I'm making this
change separately.
llvm-svn: 291523
As requested by Rafael Espindola in his post-commit comments on r268036. This
makes the previous behaviour the default while still allowing verification of
IAS.
llvm-svn: 268496
The patch adds lazy relocation support for MIPS and R_MIPS_26 relocation
handing.
R_MIPS_26 relocation might require PLT entry creation. In that case it
is fully supported by the patch. But if the relocation target is a local
symbol we need to use a different expression to calculate the relocation
result. This case is not implemented yet because there is no method to
get know the kind of relocation target in the `relocateOne` routine.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16982
llvm-svn: 260424
Georgii Rymar