```
createFiles(args)
readDefsym
readerLinkerScript(*mb)
...
readMemory
readMemoryAssignment("ORIGIN", "org", "o") // eagerly evaluated
target = getTarget();
link(args)
writeResult<ELFT>()
...
finalizeSections()
script->processSymbolAssignments()
addSymbol(cmd) // with this patch, evaluated here
```
readMemoryAssignment eagerly evaluates ORIGIN/LENGTH and returns an uint64_t.
This patch postpones the evaluation to make
* --defsym and symbol assignments
* `CONSTANT(COMMONPAGESIZE)` (requires a non-null `lld:🧝:target`)
work. If the expression somehow requires interaction with memory
regions, the circular dependency may cause the expression to evaluate to
a strange value. See the new test added to memory-err.s
Reviewed By: grimar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75763
This patch fixes a small issue with respect to how memory region names
are parsed on output section descriptions. For example, consider:
.text : { *(.text) } > rom
That can also be written like:
.text : { *(.text) } >rom
The latter form is accepted by GNU LD and is fairly common.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35920
llvm-svn: 309191
Previously, we allowed only integers in this context. Now you can
write expressions there. LLD is now able to handle the following
linker, for example.
MEMORY { rom (rx) : ORIGIN = (1024 * 1024) }
llvm-svn: 300131
We do not check for similarities when handling unknown tokens in
linker scripts, so "ORIGI" and "LENTH" are not good tokens as a test
for unknown tokens, as I was tempted to "fix" them.
llvm-svn: 300130
As specified here:
* https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs/ld/MEMORY.html#MEMORY
There are two deviations from what is specified for GNU ld:
1. Only integer constants and *not* constant expressions
are allowed in `LENGTH` and `ORIGIN` initializations.
2. The `I` and `L` attributes are *not* implemented.
With (1) there is currently no easy way to evaluate integer
only constant expressions. This can be enhanced in the
future.
With (2) it isn't clear how these flags map to the `SHF_*`
flags or if they even make sense for an ELF linker.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28911
llvm-svn: 292875