For an out-of-range relocation referencing a non-local symbol, report the symbol name and the object file that defines the symbol. As an example:
```
t.o:(function func: .text.func+0x3): relocation R_X86_64_32S out of range: -281474974609120 is not in [-2147483648, 2147483647]
```
=>
```
t.o:(function func: .text.func+0x3): relocation R_X86_64_32S out of range: -281474974609120 is not in [-2147483648, 2147483647]; references func
>>> defined in t1.o
```
Reviewed By: grimar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73518
Ported the D64906 technique to AArch64. It deletes 3 alignments at
PT_LOAD boundaries for the default case: the size of an aarch64 binary
decreases by at most 192kb.
If `sh_addralign(.tdata) < sh_addralign(.tbss)`,
we can potentially make `p_vaddr(PT_TLS)%p_align(PT_TLS) != 0`.
ld.so that are known to have problems if p_vaddr%p_align!=0:
* musl<=1.1.22
* FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT (and before) rtld-elf arm64
New test aarch64-tls-vaddr-align.s checks that our workaround makes p_vaddr%p_align = 0.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64930
llvm-svn: 369344
Similar to R_AARCH64_ABS32, R_PPC64_ADDR32 can represent either a signed
value or unsigned value, thus we should use `[-2**(n-1), 2**n)` instead of
`[-2**(n-1), 2**(n-1))` to check overflows.
The issue manifests as a bogus linker error when linking the powerpc64le Linux kernel.
The new behavior is compatible with ld.bfd's complain_overflow_bitfield.
The upper bound of the error message is not correct. Fix it as well.
The changes to R_PPC_ADDR16, R_PPC64_ADDR16, R_X86_64_8 and R_X86_64_16 are similar.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63690
llvm-svn: 364164
Summary:
As for x86_64, the default image base for AArch64 and i386 should be
aligned to a superpage appropriate for the architecture.
On AArch64, this is 2 MiB, on i386 it is 4 MiB.
Reviewers: emaste, grimar, javed.absar, espindola, ruiu, peter.smith, srhines, rprichard
Reviewed By: ruiu, peter.smith
Subscribers: jfb, markj, arichardson, krytarowski, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50297
llvm-svn: 342746
All relocations, which cannot be handled by the dynamic linker,
cause a linking error "rebuild with -fPIC".
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15193
llvm-svn: 254840
ABI specifies the allowed range for these relocations as 2^(n-1) <= X < 2^n.
The patch fixes checks and introduces precise tests for these relocations.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14957
llvm-svn: 254146