In the commentary for D11660, I wasn't sure if it was alright to create new
integer machine instructions without also creating the implicit EFLAGS operand.
From what I can see, the implicit operand is always created by the MachineInstrBuilder
based on the instruction type, so we don't have to do that explicitly. However, in
reviewing the debug output, I noticed that the operand was not marked as 'dead'.
The machine combiner should do that to preserve future optimization opportunities
that may be checking for that dead EFLAGS operand themselves.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11696
llvm-svn: 243990
Add i16, i32, i64 imul machine instructions to the list of reassociation
candidates.
A new bit of logic is needed to handle integer instructions: they have an
implicit EFLAGS operand, so we have to make sure it's dead in order to do
any reassociation with integer ops.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11660
llvm-svn: 243756
Sanjay Patel